5 law tips today Vinothpandian: 2019 (2) CTC 924 : varun pahwa vs Renu choudhary : power to grant amendment of pleadings is intended to serve ends of justice and not governed by narrow technicalities ( order 6 rule 17 CPC 1908 )

[11/06, 09:34] Vinothpandian: 2019 (2) CTC 924 : varun pahwa vs Renu choudhary : power to grant amendment of pleadings is intended to serve ends of justice and not governed by narrow technicalities ( order 6 rule 17 CPC 1908 )
[11/06, 09:34] Vinothpandian: 2013(6) CTC 241 : Lakshman vs state by inspector of police ( DB ) : CRPC sec 374(2) : Appellate court would normally in hearing appeal ,appreciate evidence on record as court of first instance and not read judgement of trial
[11/06, 09:34] Vinothpandian: 2016(5) CTC 117 : sarasu vs Ravi : sec 5 limitation act : Application for condoning delay filed under sec 5 to be dealt with liberally and leniently in order to do substantial justice to parties ,length of delay not a material factor for deciding application under section 5 of limitation act
[11/06, 09:34] Vinothpandian: 2018(1) LW ( cri ) 554: mareeshwaran S vs state through inspector of police pandal gudi police station , virudhunagar : when a full bench judgement is held to be bad in law by a subsequent bench and there is no indication regarding retrospective operation , held larger bench and latter full bench decision would apply retrospectively
[11/06, 09:34] Vinothpandian: 2016 (4) CPJ 28 : pooja pincha & another vs state bank of india : mortgage deed lost by bank , entire loan amount refunded , while original document is not available , loss of document of ownership is not a venial and trivial matter ,directed all cost of mortgage be borne by bank as well as cost imposed by the consumer forum

You may also like...