Follow:
- Next story [12/24, 07:42] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1209295693489115136?s=08 [12/24, 07:42] Sekarreporter 1: [12/24, 07:32] Chandrasekar Mhc Advt: Today tips for judicial exam 24.12.19 “Right of arrested person ” according to sec 41D crpc 1973, when any person is arrested and interrogated by Police, he shall be entitled to meet an advocate of his choice during interrogation, though not throughout interrogation . BY.CHANDRU LAW ACADEMY πΉ [12/24, 07:41] Sekarreporter 1: π
- Previous story Senior Nl Raja Sir: Justice Chandru is doing phenomenally dedicated work for the children of this school..many of them are under privilegedβ¦i have heard that if he finds a student being absent for long periods without reason he even visits their house to find the reason..and brings them back to school..great work Sir..i would request more advocates to support his meaningful work. [12/23, 19:13] Sekarreporter 1: πππ
Recent Posts
- Breaking
- today 5 law tips Vinothpandian: 2020 (1) CTC 33 : Hariba tatyaba more vs dada ekhatnath more ( FB ) : procedural laws intended to sub – serve cause of substantive justice , inherent power under section 151 of code can be exercised in interest of justice to restore suit dismissed under order 9 rule 5 ( 1) CPC 1908
- Today the matter was listed before the High Court, honourable justice, Sachin Dutta, heard both the parties enquired election commission as to what action has been taken on the representation of the petitioner. The ECI produced an order dated 20 April 2024, that was passed after the filing of the repetition Wherein ECI, without any reasoning has rejected the representation. ECI stated that the petitioner didnβt have the locus and petition. The earlier petition filed with regard to the same issue by someone else has been dismissed as withdrawn at the Honble High Court of Delhi.
- THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTHWP.No.6859 of 2017 andWMP.Nos.7912 of 2020 & 7436 of 2017Sasikala β¦ PetitionerVs1.The Secretary to Government, Health Department, Tamil Nadu, Fort St. George, Chennai.2.The District Collector, Salem District.3.The Superintendent of Police, Salem District.
- (no title)
More
Recent Posts
- Breaking
- today 5 law tips Vinothpandian: 2020 (1) CTC 33 : Hariba tatyaba more vs dada ekhatnath more ( FB ) : procedural laws intended to sub – serve cause of substantive justice , inherent power under section 151 of code can be exercised in interest of justice to restore suit dismissed under order 9 rule 5 ( 1) CPC 1908
- Today the matter was listed before the High Court, honourable justice, Sachin Dutta, heard both the parties enquired election commission as to what action has been taken on the representation of the petitioner. The ECI produced an order dated 20 April 2024, that was passed after the filing of the repetition Wherein ECI, without any reasoning has rejected the representation. ECI stated that the petitioner didnβt have the locus and petition. The earlier petition filed with regard to the same issue by someone else has been dismissed as withdrawn at the Honble High Court of Delhi.
- THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTHWP.No.6859 of 2017 andWMP.Nos.7912 of 2020 & 7436 of 2017Sasikala β¦ PetitionerVs1.The Secretary to Government, Health Department, Tamil Nadu, Fort St. George, Chennai.2.The District Collector, Salem District.3.The Superintendent of Police, Salem District.
- (no title)