IT dept. seeks compensation from Jayalalithaa’s estate by Sekar Reporter · July 17, 2020 CHENNAII-T dept. seeks compensation from Jayalalithaa’s estateVeda Nilayam, the residence of the former Chief Minister J. Jayalalithaa. | Photo Credit: B_JOTHI RAMALINGAMLegal CorrespondentCHENNAI 17 JULY 2020 00:01 ISTUPDATED: 17 JULY 2020 03:28 IST Department said it has to collect arrears of around ₹30 croreThe State government on Thursday told the Madras High Court that apart from former Chief Minister Jayalalithaa’s niece J. Deepa and nephew J. Deepak, the Income Tax (I-T) department too had responded to a notice issued for acquisition of her residence Veda Nilayam at Poes Garden here and payment of compensation.Appearing before Justice N. Anand Venkatesh, Advocate General Vijay Narayan said the official concerned had recently issued a notice under Section 21 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act of 2013 inviting claims to compensation, rehabilitation and resettlement.Though the niece and nephew had responded to the notice in their capacity as legal heirs, the I-T department too had staked claim for compensation on the ground that it had to collect arrears of around ₹30 crore. Some cases regarding that were also pending in the High Court following orders passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, he said.AdvertisingAdvertisingThe submissions were made during the hearing of a writ petition filed by Mr. Deepak challenging the acquisition proceedings. He claimed that Jayalalithaa had treated her residence as a temple and it was her wish that the family should continue to maintain it after her death. The petitioner claimed that she never wanted it to be converted into a memorial.His counsel S.L. Sudarsanam also brought it to the notice of the judge that a Division Bench of Justices N. Kirubakaran and Abdul Quddhose had on May 27 declared his client and the latter’s sister as Jayalalithaa’s legal heirs. It also directed them to allot a few of the properties for creation of a public trust to be named after her and report compliance within eight weeks.Since the eight-week period would get over in another 10 days, Justice Venkatesh directed the High Court Registry to list the present writ petition too before the Division Bench after obtaining necessary approval from Chief Justice Amreshwar Pratap Sahi. He, however, refrained from passing any interim order restraining the government from proceeding further.When the petitioner’s counsel insisted that at least the Advocate General could ensure that the acquisition proceedings do not proceed further until the cases get listed before the Division Bench, Justice Venkatesh said: “When I am not inclined to pass any interim orders, how can you expect the Advocate General to pass an order in your favour.”
https://wwwsekarreporter.wordpress.com/2020/10/09/mr-justice-v-parthibanwrit-petition-no-10973-of-2020/ [10/9, 19:20] Sekarreporter 1: In the above circumstances, it is incumbent upon the second respondent Authority to explore a channel for promotion of October 10, 2020 by Sekar Reporter · Published October 10, 2020
HC: Casual employees have no right of permanent absorption – http://toi.in/wClZFa74/a31gj Use the TOI app to get Breaking news and headlines. Download now: https://timesofindia.onelink.me/efRt/ASmwebshare November 24, 2020 by Sekar Reporter · Published November 24, 2020
[28/03, 14:22] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1773271895485317200?t=MsfEAHmgmHmp4lev5b-VaA&s=08[28/03, 14:23] sekarreporter1: Crl.M.P.No.1322 of 2024 inCrl.O.P.No.7699 of 2023A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.The present petition has been filed by a victimized complainant seeking cancellation of bail granted by this court in Crl.O.P.No.7699 of 2023 to the second respondent herein in respect of offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 448, 420, 506(2) IPC in Crime No.426 of 2022 on the file of the first respondent herein, contending that the second respondent herein had misrepresented this court for getting the bail and he had not fulfilled the condition imposed by this court while granting the bail. March 28, 2024 by Sekar Reporter · Published March 28, 2024