You may also like...
-
அதிரடி உத்தரவு JUSTICE N.SESHASAYEE W.P. No.7920 of 2022 K.R.Jayagopi … Petitioner Vs. 1.The Hon’ble Tamil Nadu Lokayukta.For Petitioner : Mr.V.Raghavachari Senior Advocate Assisted by Mr.S.T.Bharath Gowtham For Respondents : Mr.R.Shanmugasundaram Advocate General for R2 to R4, R6 Ms.S.Meenakshi for R1 Ms.M.Sneha for R5 To conclude, this petition is allowed, and this Court sets aside the order of the Lokayukta, dated 02.03.2022, and the complaint of the petitioner dated 13.01.2022 is remanded back to the Tamil Nadu Lokayukta, the first respondent, with a direction to revisit the same in the light of what have been hereinabove stated.
by Sekar Reporter · Published November 7, 2023
-
HC cj bench seeks Centre’s stand on quota in medical seats
by Sekar Reporter · Published January 28, 2021
-
I find that the Gift Deed of the year 1987 is valid in law, wherein the place earmarked as a big park in the layout has been gifted to the Municipality and the 1st respondent Municipality in order to cater the needs of the general public has permitted the Tamil Nadu Water Supply and Drainage Board to do the needful and carrying their activities and hence, I find that the petitioners have not made prima facie case nor any balance of convenience in their endeavor. On the contrary, I find that there is prima facie case only in respect of the first respondent Municipality and hence, I am not inclined to grant any interim order. 10. Accordingly, this writ miscellaneous petition stands dismissed. 24.03.2023 ata RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN.J, ata Pre-delivery order made in W.M.P.No.7679 of 2023 in W.P.No.7565 of 2023 24.03.2023
by Sekar Reporter · Published April 1, 2023