You may also like...
-
chandru former judge mhc –Cheque-bouncing cases back to square one Mr.Patty, there is no hard and fast rule in the matter of burden of proof. On the other hand, depending on the statute, the burden can always be shifted. In many criminal laws (e.g. rape offence), the burden has also been shifted to the accused in certain circumstances.
by Sekar Reporter · Published June 15, 2020
-
THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMARC.S.No.60 of 2021SEVA BHARATHI, TAMILNADU“SEVA” Second FloorNo.79. Alagappa Chettiyar RoadPurasaiwakkamChennai – 600 084Rep by its Trustee Rabu Manohar .. PlaintiffVersusSurendar @ Naathikan .. DefendantCivil Suit filed under Order IV Rule 1 of Original Side Rules 1956 read with Order VII Rule 1 of CPC praying for the following judgment and decree against the defendants.
by Sekar Reporter · Published March 15, 2024
-
Justice Swaminathan on partly allowing the appeal in so far as defendants 2 to 6 are concerned, held that the plaintiff has established that he suffered damage and injury and it is obvious that the mosque management wanted to teach the plaintiff a hard lesson while there was no cause at all for the complaint. Following this, the court also directed Abubacker (first defendant) to pay Rs 50,000 as compensation to the plaintiff with 6% interest per annum from the date of plaint till the date of payment.
by Sekar Reporter · Published May 27, 2021