You may also like...
-
Answers to the Issues : In view thereof, the various findings of the Trial Court Court jointly in respect of the issues No. 1 to 4 is set aside and it is answered that the suit is barred by limitation and therefore consideration of the plaintiffs’ case on merits does not arise and the ultimate decision of the Trial Court in dismissing the suit is affirmed. The Result: In the result : (i) The Appeal Suit in A.S. No. 542 of 2011 is dismissed; (ii) There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 02.01.2023 Index : yes Speaking order grs To The Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court No.2), Cuddalore. The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court of Madras. D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J., grs
by Sekar Reporter · Published January 3, 2023
-
In view of the aforesaid findings, both the Crl.A.Nos.898 and 829 of 2019 are without any merits and the Trial Court has imposed only the minimum sentence for both the offenses and therefore, the judgment of the Trial Court does not call for any interference. The Criminal Appeals stand dismissed. Consequently, Crl.M.P.No.7429 of 2020 is closed. 05.08.2022 Index : yes/no Speaking order/Non-speaking order kmk/grs D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J., kmk/grs To The Special Judge, I Additional Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under NDPS Act, Chennai. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, NIB CID, Chennai. Pre-Delivery Judgment in Crl.A.Nos.829 and 898 of 2019 05.08.2022 [1] (2011) 11 SCC 653 [2] (2020) 2 SCC 290 [3] (2008) 16 SCC 417 [4] (2017) 13 SCC 636 [5] (2008) 4 SCC 54 [6] (2018) 17 SCC 627 [7] (2020) 10 SCC 120
by Sekar Reporter · Published August 9, 2022
-
Former Chief justice n paul vasatha kumar interview
by Sekar Reporter · Published March 18, 2021