Follow:
- Next story THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S. VAIDYANATHAN W.P(MD)No.14135 of 2020 Mathavadiyan … Petitioner Vs. 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tenkasi-++,It is pertinent to mention that though this Court time and again issues directions to the Government to frame guidelines and issue Government Orders / Circulars, unless or otherwise those orders / Circulars are circulated to the Registry for tagging along with the concerned bundle, it S. VAIDYANATHAN, J.,
- Previous story IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Orders Reserved on 30.10.2020 Pronounced on 09.11.2020 CORAM THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH anna university case For Respondent : Mr.P.H.Arvind Pandian in both WPs Additional Advocate General Assisted by Mr.L.P.Shanmugasundaram Standing Counsel
Recent Posts
- [05/05, 22:32] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1787165884664201599?t=njgtnxt-0hgcEfah2N9U_A&s=08[05/05, 22:32] sekarreporter1: “For Petitioners : Mr.M.LoganathanFor Respondents : Mr.A.Selvendran, SGP for R1 to R4ORDERThis Writ Petition has been filed for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to theimpugned orders passed by the third respondent”https://sekarreporter.com/the-honourable-mr-justice-n-sathish-kumarw-p-no-11087-of-2024-and-w-m-p-nos-12165-12166-of-20241-s-r-muthusamy2-m-ravichandranvs-1-the-district-collector-tiruppur-district/#:~:text=For%20Petitioners%20%3A%20Mr.M.Loganathan%0AFor%20Respondents%20%3A%20Mr.A.Selvendran%2C%20SGP%20for%20R1%20to%20R4%0AORDER%0AThis%20Writ%20Petition%20has%20been%20filed%20for%20the%20issuance%20of%20a%20Writ%20of%20Certiorarified%20Mandamus%2C%20to%20call%20for%20the%20records%20pertaining%20to%20the%0Aimpugned%20orders%20passed%20by%20the%20third%20respondent
- THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE N.MALA W.P.No. 6343 of 2022S.Madhavan …PetitionerVs.M/s.THG Publishing Pvt. Ltd.(formerly M/s. Kasturi & Sons Ltd.) 859 & 860, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002.…RespondentWrit Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the Principal Labour Court, Chennai, in Complaint Petition No. 1 of 2020 in I.D.No.205 of 2016 dated 19.08.2021 and quash the same.For Petitioner : Mr.S.Madhavanparty-in-personFor Respondent : Mr.G.Anand gopalan for T.S.Gopalan & Company.ORDERWrit petition is filed challenging the Award passed in ComplaintNo.1 of 2020 in I.D.No.205 of 2016.2.The background of facts leading to the writ petition are that the respondent is a newspaper establishment in terms of the WorkingJournalist and Other Newspaper Employees (conditions of service) andMiscellaneous Provisions Act 1955 (Herein after called Working Journalist Act).
- THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMARW.P.No.11087 of 2024 and W.M.P.Nos.12165 & 12166 of 20241.S.R.Muthusamy2.M.RavichandranVs.1.The District Collector, Tiruppur District
- This appeal raises a very interesting question of law. THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANANSecond Appeal No.714 of 2013 and C.M.P.No.5377 of 20241.Lakshmi Ammal2.Roji Ammal
- Today tips [05/05, 07:14] DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: 1998 (7) SCC 123: –
More
Recent Posts
- [05/05, 22:32] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1787165884664201599?t=njgtnxt-0hgcEfah2N9U_A&s=08[05/05, 22:32] sekarreporter1: “For Petitioners : Mr.M.LoganathanFor Respondents : Mr.A.Selvendran, SGP for R1 to R4ORDERThis Writ Petition has been filed for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to theimpugned orders passed by the third respondent”https://sekarreporter.com/the-honourable-mr-justice-n-sathish-kumarw-p-no-11087-of-2024-and-w-m-p-nos-12165-12166-of-20241-s-r-muthusamy2-m-ravichandranvs-1-the-district-collector-tiruppur-district/#:~:text=For%20Petitioners%20%3A%20Mr.M.Loganathan%0AFor%20Respondents%20%3A%20Mr.A.Selvendran%2C%20SGP%20for%20R1%20to%20R4%0AORDER%0AThis%20Writ%20Petition%20has%20been%20filed%20for%20the%20issuance%20of%20a%20Writ%20of%20Certiorarified%20Mandamus%2C%20to%20call%20for%20the%20records%20pertaining%20to%20the%0Aimpugned%20orders%20passed%20by%20the%20third%20respondent
- THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE N.MALA W.P.No. 6343 of 2022S.Madhavan …PetitionerVs.M/s.THG Publishing Pvt. Ltd.(formerly M/s. Kasturi & Sons Ltd.) 859 & 860, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002.…RespondentWrit Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the Principal Labour Court, Chennai, in Complaint Petition No. 1 of 2020 in I.D.No.205 of 2016 dated 19.08.2021 and quash the same.For Petitioner : Mr.S.Madhavanparty-in-personFor Respondent : Mr.G.Anand gopalan for T.S.Gopalan & Company.ORDERWrit petition is filed challenging the Award passed in ComplaintNo.1 of 2020 in I.D.No.205 of 2016.2.The background of facts leading to the writ petition are that the respondent is a newspaper establishment in terms of the WorkingJournalist and Other Newspaper Employees (conditions of service) andMiscellaneous Provisions Act 1955 (Herein after called Working Journalist Act).
- THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMARW.P.No.11087 of 2024 and W.M.P.Nos.12165 & 12166 of 20241.S.R.Muthusamy2.M.RavichandranVs.1.The District Collector, Tiruppur District
- This appeal raises a very interesting question of law. THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANANSecond Appeal No.714 of 2013 and C.M.P.No.5377 of 20241.Lakshmi Ammal2.Roji Ammal
- Today tips [05/05, 07:14] DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: 1998 (7) SCC 123: –