![[12/17, 09:48] Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1339424677630857217?s=08 [12/17, 09:48] Sekarreporter1: [12/17, 09:28] N. Ramesh Ed Advt: https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/karnataka/high-court-upholds-eds-actions-against-firms-individuals-in-money-laundering-probes/article33340377.ece [12/17, 09:46] Sekarreporter1: On the contrary, Mr.Ramesh, the learned counsel for the Enforcement Directorate, submitted that the writ petition is not maintainable on the grounds that the proceedings relating to the confiscation attained finality with the order dated November 26, 1999. Accordingly, a separate writ petition for payment of interest is not maintainable.](https://sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story பிப்ரவரி 8ம் தேதி ஐகோர்ட் திறக்கப்படுமா ? வக்கீல் சங்க தலைவர் மோகனகிருஷ்ணன் பேட்டி
- Previous story Chief Justice Sanjib Banerjee and Justice M.M. Sundresh directed that the petition be forwarded to the Head of Electrical and Mechanical Departments, IIT – Madras, and sought a report by the next hearing date on February 15. The points that have been raised could be considered in the report, the court said.
Recent Posts
- Breaking
- today 5 law tips Vinothpandian: 2020 (1) CTC 33 : Hariba tatyaba more vs dada ekhatnath more ( FB ) : procedural laws intended to sub – serve cause of substantive justice , inherent power under section 151 of code can be exercised in interest of justice to restore suit dismissed under order 9 rule 5 ( 1) CPC 1908
- Today the matter was listed before the High Court, honourable justice, Sachin Dutta, heard both the parties enquired election commission as to what action has been taken on the representation of the petitioner. The ECI produced an order dated 20 April 2024, that was passed after the filing of the repetition Wherein ECI, without any reasoning has rejected the representation. ECI stated that the petitioner didn’t have the locus and petition. The earlier petition filed with regard to the same issue by someone else has been dismissed as withdrawn at the Honble High Court of Delhi.
- THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTHWP.No.6859 of 2017 andWMP.Nos.7912 of 2020 & 7436 of 2017Sasikala … PetitionerVs1.The Secretary to Government, Health Department, Tamil Nadu, Fort St. George, Chennai.2.The District Collector, Salem District.3.The Superintendent of Police, Salem District.
- (no title)
More
Recent Posts
- Breaking
- today 5 law tips Vinothpandian: 2020 (1) CTC 33 : Hariba tatyaba more vs dada ekhatnath more ( FB ) : procedural laws intended to sub – serve cause of substantive justice , inherent power under section 151 of code can be exercised in interest of justice to restore suit dismissed under order 9 rule 5 ( 1) CPC 1908
- Today the matter was listed before the High Court, honourable justice, Sachin Dutta, heard both the parties enquired election commission as to what action has been taken on the representation of the petitioner. The ECI produced an order dated 20 April 2024, that was passed after the filing of the repetition Wherein ECI, without any reasoning has rejected the representation. ECI stated that the petitioner didn’t have the locus and petition. The earlier petition filed with regard to the same issue by someone else has been dismissed as withdrawn at the Honble High Court of Delhi.
- THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTHWP.No.6859 of 2017 andWMP.Nos.7912 of 2020 & 7436 of 2017Sasikala … PetitionerVs1.The Secretary to Government, Health Department, Tamil Nadu, Fort St. George, Chennai.2.The District Collector, Salem District.3.The Superintendent of Police, Salem District.
- (no title)