You may also like...
-
[10/21, 11:58] sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/A8qQdsZsJBY?si=EJuKXF54H6Ed7GVl [10/21, 11:58] sekarreporter1: [10/21, 11:40] sekarreporter1: https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/sc-flags-pendency-of-21-names-for-appointment-transfer-of-hc-judges-says-pick-and-choose-creates-problem/article67442649.ece [10/21, 11:54] sekarreporter1: நீதிபதி கவுல் அரசாங்கத்திடம் பேசினார். ‘தேர்ந்தெடுக்கப்பட்ட பிரித்தல்’ அரசாங்கத்தின் பெயர்களைத் தேர்ந்தெடுத்துப் பிரிப்பது நீதித்துறை மூப்புக்கு இடையூறாக இருப்பதாக பெஞ்ச் கூறியது. “நீங்கள் [அரசாங்கம்] சிலரை நியமித்து, மற்றவர்களை நியமிக்காதபோது, சீனியாரிட்டியின் முன்மாதிரியே குழப்பமடைகிறது… உங்கள் தேர்வு மற்றும் தேர்வு பல சிக்கல்களை உருவாக்குகிறது… நீங்கள் சமீபத்தில் சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றத்திற்கு இரண்டு பெயர்களை அனுமதித்துள்ளீர்கள், ஆனால் பழைய பெயர்கள் இன்னும் நிலுவையில் உள்ளது,” என்று நீதிபதி கவுல் குறிப்பிட்டார்.
by Sekar Reporter · Published October 21, 2023
-
In the opinion of this Court the orders of transfer must disclose that the competent authority was behind the transfers not only in form but its substance as well. A reference to the approval of the Vice Chancellor in the orders of transfer must be supported by the relevant documents. In the absence of any modicum of participation on the part of Vice Chancellor, the impugned orders. –For Petitioner in W.P.No.10081/2020 : Mr.R.Singaravelan, Senior Counsel for M/s. Adith Narayan Vijayaraghavan For Respondents in W.P.No.10081/2020 : Mr.R.A.S.Senthilvel, Additional Government Pleader for R1 Mr.A.L.Somayaji, Senior Counsel assisted by Mr.Abdul Saleem, Standing Counsel for R2 to R4 W.P.No.8650 of 2020 are liable to be declared as not having been passed legally, meeting the mandatory procedural requirements in terms of the University statute and regulations. This Court is unable to persuade itself to accept the disjunctive tabulated sheets containing the names of the transferees and the signatures of the Vice Chancellor underneath the column “Approved” as valid material for sustaining the orders of transfer. The contention that the transfer orders are not passed in terms of the procedure contemplated in the Statute governing the University administration is to be held as well founded, borne out by the records. [3/25, 14:18] Sekarreporter1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Order reserved on 18.12.2020 Order delivered on: 25.03.2021 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.PARTHIBAN W.P.Nos.10081, 8650, 10411, 10753,10757 & 14200 of 2020
by Sekar Reporter · Published March 25, 2021
-
WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT PRAYER The Petitioner has filed the instant Writ Petition for the issuance of a Writ of Quo Warranto to call upon the 1st Respondent to show cause under what authority of law the 1st Respondent is holding the post of Member of Parliament. AVERMENTS/ALLEGATIONS BY THE PETITIONER Broadly, the averments of the Petitioner are as follows: That, by the way of the speech delivered, the 1st Respondent is liable to be disqualified from his post as he has allegedly: • breached his constitutional oath • violated the fundamental right of the Petitioner under Article 25 of the Constitution of India
by Sekar Reporter · Published November 10, 2023