You may also like...
-
-
Full order of rskjFor Petitioner : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR W.P.No.12860 of 2018 and W.M.P.No.15112 of 2018 T.A.Ranganathan S/o T.A.Narasimhachari … Petitioner Mr.Srinivasa Raghavan, Senior Advocate for Mr.R.Palaniandavar For Respondents : Mr.Arun Natarajan, Government Advocate – for RR 1 and 2 Mr.K.Hariharan – for R3 Mr.Niranjan Rajagopalan for M/s.G.R.Associates – for R4 –(d)It is made clear that, while deciding the matter, the Joint Commissioner shall give credence to whatever input and materials supplied by the parties inter se ie., the petitioner as well as the third and fourth respondents’ side also and accordingly decide the issue in accordance with law by taking into account the age old customs being practised in the temple on the issue raised therein. With the above observations and directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
by Sekar Reporter · Published November 13, 2021
-
Judge vaithiyanathan j order –The inaction of the Officials would amount to dereliction of duty, no devotion to work and the like; An enquiry has to be conducted on a day-to-day basis and the erring Officials should be shown the doors. Initiation of departmental proceedings and initiation of contempt are independent of each other. Departmental proceedings are for not discharging duties and the like, and contempt is for wilful and deliberate disobedience of the order of this Court.
by Sekar Reporter · Published June 8, 2021