Follow:
- Next story Bench adjourns the case to February 10 Additional Solicitor-General G. Rajagopalan on Monday told the Madras High Court that the Centre had decided to follow a fair and transparent procedure for appointment of State Election Commissioner (SEC) in Puducherry only because it did not want the SEC to act as a “stooge” of the State government in the Union Territory and instead discharge his or her Constitutional functions without fear or favour. Appearing before Justices M. Sathyanarayanan and R. Hemalatha, who were seized of a writ plea filed by Local Administration Minister A. Namassivayam, Mr. Rajagopalan clarified that it was not Lieutenant Governor Kiran Bedi but the Centre which had constituted a committee headed by the Chief Secretary of the union territory to select the SEC after calling for applications from candidates across the country.
- Previous story எளியவர் நிழலில் மனம் மகிழும் இறைவன் written by ஆன்மீக எமுத்தாளர் வக்கீல் Hemalatha
Recent Posts
- நீதிபதி என். சதீஷ்குமார், நீதிமன்றங்கள் பல்வேறு தீர்ப்புகளை வழங்கியுள்ளது. தவறான ஆவணங்கள் இணைக்கப்பட்டுள்ளதாக சார் பதிவாளர் கருதினால் மட்டுமே பதிவு செய்ய மறுக்க முடியும்.ஆனால் பல சார் பதிவாளர் அலுவலகங்களில் உரிய ஆவணங்கள் இருந்தும் மறுப்பு தெரிவிக்கின்றனர்.
- Judge sathiskumar / order./In the result, the order passed by the first respondent in refusal checkslip in RFL/Rasipuram/104/2024 dated 05.04.2024 is set aside and the first respondent is directed to receive and register the sale deed dated 05.04.2024 within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order.
- THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR andTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGANW.A(MD)No.479 of 2024 andC.M.P(MD)No.3875 of 20241.The State of Tamil Nadu,Represented by its Secretary,Department of School Education, Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009.2.The Joint Commissioner of School Education (Personnel),
- 04/05, 08:50] K. Chandru Former Judge Of Highcourt: அம்மி மிதித்து அருந்ததி பார்க்கும் சடங்குகள் அர்த்தமற்றவை!-கே.சந்துரு, மேனாள் நீதிபதி, சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம்
- Quashing the refusal slip provided by Rasipuram sub-registrar, the judge said, “The official’s decision to not register a sale deed presented by the petitioner since an appeal is pending as against the preliminary decree cannot be sustained in the eye of law. Despite judicial pronouncements, registrations are refused citing internal department circulars. It is not open to the registering authorities to interpret the judgement and decide whether the facts are applied to the particular case or not,” HC noted.
More
Recent Posts
- நீதிபதி என். சதீஷ்குமார், நீதிமன்றங்கள் பல்வேறு தீர்ப்புகளை வழங்கியுள்ளது. தவறான ஆவணங்கள் இணைக்கப்பட்டுள்ளதாக சார் பதிவாளர் கருதினால் மட்டுமே பதிவு செய்ய மறுக்க முடியும்.ஆனால் பல சார் பதிவாளர் அலுவலகங்களில் உரிய ஆவணங்கள் இருந்தும் மறுப்பு தெரிவிக்கின்றனர்.
- Judge sathiskumar / order./In the result, the order passed by the first respondent in refusal checkslip in RFL/Rasipuram/104/2024 dated 05.04.2024 is set aside and the first respondent is directed to receive and register the sale deed dated 05.04.2024 within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order.
- THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR andTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGANW.A(MD)No.479 of 2024 andC.M.P(MD)No.3875 of 20241.The State of Tamil Nadu,Represented by its Secretary,Department of School Education, Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009.2.The Joint Commissioner of School Education (Personnel),
- 04/05, 08:50] K. Chandru Former Judge Of Highcourt: அம்மி மிதித்து அருந்ததி பார்க்கும் சடங்குகள் அர்த்தமற்றவை!-கே.சந்துரு, மேனாள் நீதிபதி, சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம்
- Quashing the refusal slip provided by Rasipuram sub-registrar, the judge said, “The official’s decision to not register a sale deed presented by the petitioner since an appeal is pending as against the preliminary decree cannot be sustained in the eye of law. Despite judicial pronouncements, registrations are refused citing internal department circulars. It is not open to the registering authorities to interpret the judgement and decide whether the facts are applied to the particular case or not,” HC noted.