You may also like...
-
Mhc PIL plea to prescribe safety protocols for inter State movement of goods
by Sekar Reporter · Published April 22, 2020
-
Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy noted that on verifying the challenged order it is proved that the respondent regarded the timely payment of the applicant of the due amounts for the variance between the GSTR 1 and 3B dated January 9, 2023. Even after the consideration the respondent incorrectly mentioned on Page 23 of the transcript that levied entity loses to settle tax liabilities within 15 days of obtaining the notice on 17th March 2023. The same claim opposes the documented proof.
by Sekar Reporter · Published April 25, 2024
-
Actor sivaji sons senior adv p r raman arguments
by Sekar Reporter · Published July 20, 2022