You may also like...
-
For Petitioner : Mr.V.Ajoy Khose For R1 : Mr.M.Muthusamy Government Advocate For R2 : Mr.R.Babu It is seen that the petitioner has not only his supervision was slipshod and unscrupulous but also failed to control the recruitment activities of his subordinates, in particular, while sending call letters, preparation of computer panel list and appointment order etc, and they had resulted in the substitution of the names of 19 Conductors not sponsored through Dharmapuri Employment Exchange and Selection of 15 among them and hence, in view of the above factual position, I do not find that the order of the dismissal passed by the competent authority calls for interference. 7. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. 17.10.2023 Index: Yes / No Internet: Yes / No NCC : Yes/No sji RMT. TEEKAA RAMAN, J.
by Sekar Reporter · Published October 29, 2023
-
-
While encompassing the payment of subsistence allowance to a suspended employee under Article 21 of the Constitution, the Madras High Court has held that its non-payment shall violae the Fundamental Right. . A Division Bench of the Madras High Court comprising Chief Justice Amreshwar Pratap Sahi & Justice Subramonium Prasad has emphasized that subsistence allowance cannot be denied to employee(s) during the tenure of their suspension.u d
by Sekar Reporter · Published February 16, 2020