You may also like...
-
Election case full order of THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY AND THE HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI W.P.Nos.3785, 3801, 3802 of 2022 and W.M.P.No.3913 of 2022 in W.P.No.3785 of 2022 and W.M.P.Nos.3926 of 2022 in W.P.No.3801 of 2022 W.P.No.3785 of 2022 G.Raghupathi .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The Secretary to Government, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, North Block, New Delhi – 110 001. 2.Tamil Nadu State Election Commission, 206/N, Jawaharlal Nehru Road, Jai
by Sekar Reporter · Published February 18, 2022
-
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J. SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD Writ Petition (MD) No. 26139 of 2022 and Insofar as the other objections raised herein, the petitioners were not parties before the Tribunal and appellants before the Apex Court. Hence, they are entitled to challenge the order that affects them and that has been passed against them, without jurisdiction and in violation of the principles of natural justice. Thus, for all the reasons stated above, the Order dated 23.08.2021 passed by the Tribunal in O.A. No. 125 of 2021 cannot be allowed to be sustained and is hence, set aside. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed as prayed for. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. (R.M.D., J.) (J.S.N.P., J.) 25.01.2023. Petitioner : Mr. Ajmal Khan, Senior Advocate for M/s. Ajmal Associates For Respondents : Mr. Veera Kathiravan, Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr. P. Thillai Kumar Government Pleader for RR1 and 2 Mr. R. Rajamohan for R3
by Sekar Reporter · Published January 25, 2023
-
[6/9, 14:58] Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1402558104739278851?s=1006 [6/9, 14:58] Sekarreporter1: [6/9, 14:57] Sekarreporter1: dated 09.03.2021 passed by Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.Vaidyanathan in W.P.No.5706 of 2021. Here, the Petitioner, who is the second wife of a deceased TNEB employee has sought disbursement of family pension to her. The first wife of the deceased is none other than the Petitioner’s sister. The Petitioner’s marriage with the deceased took place during the subsistence of the first marriage. Unfortunately, after the death of the first wife, the deceased employee could not register the name of the Petitioner as his nominee. Hence, the Petitioner is before this Court. As second marriage is not legalized, the matter is directed to be placed before the Hon’ble Chief Justice for constitution of a Larger Bench. [6/9, 14:57] Sekarreporter1: 💐
by Sekar Reporter · Published June 9, 2021