Follow:
- Next story [9/10, 06:49] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1700680249410031778?t=RDea75vMnbyK0g3-OLm_zA&s=08 [9/10, 06:49] sekarreporter1: 32.Consequently, applying the Law discussed above to the facts of the present case, this Civil Revision Petition is allowed. The FIR having been registered, in this case, within two days from the date of the accident on 13.10.2022 by Oragadam Police Station, the petition filed in M.A.C.T.O.P.(SR).No.3280 of 2023 has to only be treated as a reminder to the Court to call for the FIR and other reports and register the same as a Claim Petition. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is allowed. The Order passed by the learned Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal is set aside and a direction shall be issued to treat the application filed on 19.04.2023 as a reminder to the Court for a plea of just compensation under 166(4) and take up the application for trial. No Costs. 18.08.2023 Index : Yes/No Speaking Order : Yes/No Neutral Citation Case : Yes/No mps To The Judge, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Court of Small Causes, Chennai. LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J, mps Pre-Delivery Order in C.R.P.No.2558 of 2023 18.08.2023 https://sekarreporter.com/32-consequently-applying-the-law-discussed-above-to-the-facts-of-the-present-case-this-civil-revision-petition-is-allowed-the-fir-having-been-registered-in-this-case-within-two-days-from-the-date/
- Previous story 32.Consequently, applying the Law discussed above to the facts of the present case, this Civil Revision Petition is allowed. The FIR having been registered, in this case, within two days from the date of the accident on 13.10.2022 by Oragadam Police Station, the petition filed in M.A.C.T.O.P.(SR).No.3280 of 2023 has to only be treated as a reminder to the Court to call for the FIR and other reports and register the same as a Claim Petition. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is allowed. The Order passed by the learned Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal is set aside and a direction shall be issued to treat the application filed on 19.04.2023 as a reminder to the Court for a plea of just compensation under 166(4) and take up the application for trial. No Costs. 18.08.2023 Index : Yes/No Speaking Order : Yes/No Neutral Citation Case : Yes/No mps To The Judge, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Court of Small Causes, Chennai. LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J, mps Pre-Delivery Order in C.R.P.No.2558 of 2023 18.08.2023
Recent Posts
- G R swaminathan judge / The petitioner can very well exercise his fundamental right ofperforming Angapradakshinam on the banana leaves after the guests have partaken the meals. No authority let alone the respondents can interfere with the same. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in Kaushal Kishore v. State of U.P (2023) 4 SCC 1 had held that certain fundamental rights can be invoked even against private individuals. Thus, no private individual can prevent the petitioner or any devotee from exercising his fundamental right. If there is any such obstruction, it is the duty of the police to aid the petitioner to exercise his fundamental right and remove theobstructors from the scene.
- Senior Advt Wilson: https://x.com/pwilsondmk/status/1791779458896339194?s=46Revamp or Scrap PMLA[19/05, 08:41] sekarreporter1: My article published in the New Indian Express today concerns the immediate need to revamp or repeal “The Prevention of Money Laundering Act.”
- Cancellation of GST Registration is akin to capital punishment for traders: Madras High Court
- Justice PT Asha directed the State government to file a counter while granting an interim stay in the batch of petitions seeking the ownership of the land which was notified to acquire and posted the matter to June 18 for further submission.
- RTI commissioner Priya Kumar/ மேல்முறையீட்டு மனுக்கள் மீது மாநில தகவல் ஆணையர் விசாரணை பதிலளிக்காத அதிகாரிகளுக்கு ‛’டோஸ்’
More
Recent Posts
- G R swaminathan judge / The petitioner can very well exercise his fundamental right ofperforming Angapradakshinam on the banana leaves after the guests have partaken the meals. No authority let alone the respondents can interfere with the same. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in Kaushal Kishore v. State of U.P (2023) 4 SCC 1 had held that certain fundamental rights can be invoked even against private individuals. Thus, no private individual can prevent the petitioner or any devotee from exercising his fundamental right. If there is any such obstruction, it is the duty of the police to aid the petitioner to exercise his fundamental right and remove theobstructors from the scene.
- Senior Advt Wilson: https://x.com/pwilsondmk/status/1791779458896339194?s=46Revamp or Scrap PMLA[19/05, 08:41] sekarreporter1: My article published in the New Indian Express today concerns the immediate need to revamp or repeal “The Prevention of Money Laundering Act.”
- Cancellation of GST Registration is akin to capital punishment for traders: Madras High Court
- Justice PT Asha directed the State government to file a counter while granting an interim stay in the batch of petitions seeking the ownership of the land which was notified to acquire and posted the matter to June 18 for further submission.
- RTI commissioner Priya Kumar/ மேல்முறையீட்டு மனுக்கள் மீது மாநில தகவல் ஆணையர் விசாரணை பதிலளிக்காத அதிகாரிகளுக்கு ‛’டோஸ்’