You may also like...
-
-
CHANDRU LAW ACADEMY inviting you to a lecture on may 23
by Sekar Reporter · Published May 23, 2020
-
such a view of the matter, this Court is of the view that as the revised guidelines came into effect on 29.1.2013 and the Planning Permission was granted on 25.04.2013, the Respondents have rightly demanded the rate prevailing at the time of approval, which was also paid by the Petitioner. In such a view of the matter now, the petitioner cannot seek refund. In view of the above, the Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. 10.01.2023 Index : Yes Neutral Citation : Yes ggs copy to: The Inspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Pattinampakkam, Chennai-600 028. The Sub Registrar, Office of the Sub Register, Velacherry, Chennai 600042. The Member Secretary, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, 1, Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore, Chennai-600 028. SATHISH KUMAR, J. ggs Order in: W.P.No.28150 of 2014 10.01.2023For Petitioner : Mr. V. Lakshminarayanan For Respondents : Mrs. R. Anitha Spl.Government Pleader [for R1 & R2] Mrs.K. Mageswari [for R-3]
by Sekar Reporter · Published August 19, 2023