Follow:
- Next story s M subramaniyam judge order/ In view of the fact that the petitioners have admittedly signed the bond and accepted the terms and conditions stipulated therein, they are not entitled to claim any concession for further reduction of period stipulated under the bond conditions. Therefore, the petitioners have to serve in Government Medical College and Hospitals as per the appointment order in compliance with the conditions and after completion of the period stipulated, appropriate decision may be taken by the respondents.
- Previous story In the W.P No 11463 of 2024 . The Writ Petition was Allowed in the favour of Petitioner
Recent Posts
- G R swaminathan judge / The petitioner can very well exercise his fundamental right ofperforming Angapradakshinam on the banana leaves after the guests have partaken the meals. No authority let alone the respondents can interfere with the same. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in Kaushal Kishore v. State of U.P (2023) 4 SCC 1 had held that certain fundamental rights can be invoked even against private individuals. Thus, no private individual can prevent the petitioner or any devotee from exercising his fundamental right. If there is any such obstruction, it is the duty of the police to aid the petitioner to exercise his fundamental right and remove theobstructors from the scene.
- Senior Advt Wilson: https://x.com/pwilsondmk/status/1791779458896339194?s=46Revamp or Scrap PMLA[19/05, 08:41] sekarreporter1: My article published in the New Indian Express today concerns the immediate need to revamp or repeal “The Prevention of Money Laundering Act.”
- Cancellation of GST Registration is akin to capital punishment for traders: Madras High Court
- Justice PT Asha directed the State government to file a counter while granting an interim stay in the batch of petitions seeking the ownership of the land which was notified to acquire and posted the matter to June 18 for further submission.
- RTI commissioner Priya Kumar/ மேல்முறையீட்டு மனுக்கள் மீது மாநில தகவல் ஆணையர் விசாரணை பதிலளிக்காத அதிகாரிகளுக்கு ‛’டோஸ்’
More
Recent Posts
- G R swaminathan judge / The petitioner can very well exercise his fundamental right ofperforming Angapradakshinam on the banana leaves after the guests have partaken the meals. No authority let alone the respondents can interfere with the same. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in Kaushal Kishore v. State of U.P (2023) 4 SCC 1 had held that certain fundamental rights can be invoked even against private individuals. Thus, no private individual can prevent the petitioner or any devotee from exercising his fundamental right. If there is any such obstruction, it is the duty of the police to aid the petitioner to exercise his fundamental right and remove theobstructors from the scene.
- Senior Advt Wilson: https://x.com/pwilsondmk/status/1791779458896339194?s=46Revamp or Scrap PMLA[19/05, 08:41] sekarreporter1: My article published in the New Indian Express today concerns the immediate need to revamp or repeal “The Prevention of Money Laundering Act.”
- Cancellation of GST Registration is akin to capital punishment for traders: Madras High Court
- Justice PT Asha directed the State government to file a counter while granting an interim stay in the batch of petitions seeking the ownership of the land which was notified to acquire and posted the matter to June 18 for further submission.
- RTI commissioner Priya Kumar/ மேல்முறையீட்டு மனுக்கள் மீது மாநில தகவல் ஆணையர் விசாரணை பதிலளிக்காத அதிகாரிகளுக்கு ‛’டோஸ்’