Follow:
- Next story [14/05, 13:35] sekarreporter1: [14/05, 13:35] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1790292197582987608?t=JvjidYLwgHFjQpSuTgOFbQ&s=08[14/05, 13:35] sekarreporter1: Mohanakrishnan President Mhaa: To, 14.05.2024The Registrar General,Madras High Court,Chennai.Sir,Sub: To allow the filing to successive Bail and Anticipatory Bail Petitions before the Hon’ble High Court of Madras, vacation sitting (May, 2024). sekarreporter.com/mohanakrishnan…[14/05, 17:52] sekarreporter1: சென்னை ஐகோர்ட் வக்கீல்கள் சங்க தலைவர் மோகனகிருஷ்ணன் நேற்று ஐகோர்ட் பதிவாளர் ஜெனரலுக்கு ஒரு அவசர கடித்தை அனுப்பியுள்ளார். அதில், ஜாமீன், முன் ஜாமீன் மனுக்கள் ஏற்கனவே ஐகோர்ட் தள்ளுபடி செய்ததால் கோடை விடுமுறையில் ஜாமீன் முன் ஜாமீன் மனுக்களை தாக்கல் செய்தால் அதை ஏற்க மறுக்கிறார்கள். இது தவறானது. இதனால் ஒரு மாதமாக கோடை விடுமுறையில் நிவாரணம் கிடைக்கால் சிறையில் இருக்க வேண்டிய நிலை உள்ளது. இது பெரும் கஷ்டத்தை ஏற்படுத்துகிறது. எனவே ஜாமீன், முன் ஜாமீன் மனுக்களை ஏற்கனவே தள்ளுபடி தால் கோடை விடுமுறை காலத்தில் மீண்டும் மனு தாக்கல் செய்வதை அனுமதிக்க வேண்டும் என்று கூறியுள்ளார்.
- Previous story வருமானம் குறைந்த கோவில்கள் புறக்கணிக்கப்பட்டுள்ளதாக சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றம் வேதனை தெரிவித்துள்ளது
Recent Posts
- HC restrains illegal sand quarrying on waterbody in Muthoor, grants interim injunction
- The Supreme Court on Friday said it will lay down the law on the issue of high courts revoking orders dictated in open courts after the top court came across a case in which the Madras HC quashed a money laundering case against a former IPS officer and later modified its direction and reheard the matter. A bench of Justices Abhay S Oka and Augustine George Masih stayed the proceedings in a money laundering case against former IPS
- Justice B Pugalendhi on an anticipatory bail petition filed by S Ashok Kumar, the managing director of a private company. A perusal of the order showed that the company was in charge of a water supply contract worth Rs 230 crore. Kumar had met the commissioner earlier in February and insisted that he take over the partially completed project and also deposited a black bag allegedly containing money.
- Justice G Jayachandran noted that the statue contained provocative words against believers which was the cause of Kannan’s speech and thus the person who provoked the speech could not seek prosecution for a reaction to his own provocation
- Scrutiny of the impugned notification reveals that subject temple lands are meant for a long-term lease to run a college, and thus, the object is a benevolent one. When that being so, this court is of the opinion that if the petitioner intends to point out irregularities, he may raise by way of written objections/suggestions before the first respondent,” said Justice M Thandapani in a recent order.
More
Recent Posts
- HC restrains illegal sand quarrying on waterbody in Muthoor, grants interim injunction
- The Supreme Court on Friday said it will lay down the law on the issue of high courts revoking orders dictated in open courts after the top court came across a case in which the Madras HC quashed a money laundering case against a former IPS officer and later modified its direction and reheard the matter. A bench of Justices Abhay S Oka and Augustine George Masih stayed the proceedings in a money laundering case against former IPS
- Justice B Pugalendhi on an anticipatory bail petition filed by S Ashok Kumar, the managing director of a private company. A perusal of the order showed that the company was in charge of a water supply contract worth Rs 230 crore. Kumar had met the commissioner earlier in February and insisted that he take over the partially completed project and also deposited a black bag allegedly containing money.
- Justice G Jayachandran noted that the statue contained provocative words against believers which was the cause of Kannan’s speech and thus the person who provoked the speech could not seek prosecution for a reaction to his own provocation
- Scrutiny of the impugned notification reveals that subject temple lands are meant for a long-term lease to run a college, and thus, the object is a benevolent one. When that being so, this court is of the opinion that if the petitioner intends to point out irregularities, he may raise by way of written objections/suggestions before the first respondent,” said Justice M Thandapani in a recent order.