Justice K Rajasekar delivered a meticulous judgment, emphasizing the burden of proof on the railways. The court meticulously analyzed the evidence presented, including conflicting reports from the DRM and Loco Pilot.
“The Legal Affair
Let’s talk Law
Home
Articles
Interviews
Resources
Careers
Contact Us
Madras High Court Orders Compensation for Family of Man Killed by Train While Sitting on Platform
Share this:
24/05/2024, 2 DAYS AGO
Madras High Court Orders Compensation for Family of Man Killed by Train While Sitting on Platform
Introduction:
In the case of Riyana Begum v Union of India, the Madras High Court delivered a groundbreaking verdict that shook the foundation of liability in railway accidents. The case revolved around the tragic demise of a man who was struck by a train while waiting on the platform, sparking a legal battle between the grieving family and the formidable railway authorities.
Arguments of both sides:
On one side stood the grieving family, represented by Mr. E. Vinothkumar, who argued vehemently that the deceased had been innocently waiting on the platform, holding a valid ticket, when the fateful incident occurred. They contested the Railway Claims Tribunal’s dismissal of their claim, citing lack of evidence and reliance on mere suspicion.
On the other side, the railway, represented by Mr. M. Vijay Anand, vehemently contended that the accident was a result of the deceased’s recklessness in trespassing onto the railway tracks, thus constituting a self-inflicted injury rather than an untoward incident.
Court’s Judgment:
Delving into the heart of the matter, Justice K Rajasekar delivered a meticulous judgment, emphasizing the burden of proof on the railways. The court meticulously analyzed the evidence presented, including conflicting reports from the DRM and Loco Pilot.
In the absence of concrete evidence to substantiate the railway’s claims, the court ruled in favor of the bereaved family, directing the railways to compensate them for their irreplaceable loss. This landmark judgment not only served justice to the aggrieved but also set a precedent for holding railway authorities accountable for accidents occurring within their premises.
Share this:
Post navigation
Previous: Jharkhand High Court Denies Specific Performance, Refuses Refund of Earnest Money Not Specifically Claimed
Next: Supreme Court Rules on Benami Property Disputes: No Civil or Criminal Suits Allowed
Explore
News
Articles
Resources
Interviews
Contact Us
Careers
Find jobs in law and give your career the boost it deserves
Join Us
Exploring, learning, and sharing the Indian peoples’ legal pursuits for justice.
Read more
The Legal Affair © 2024 Privacy PolicyTerms & Conditions”
https://thelegalaffair.com/news/madras-high-court-orders-compensation-for-family-of-man-killed-by-train-while-sitting-on-platform/#:~:text=The%20Legal%20Affair,PolicyTerms%20%26%20Conditions
