[06/06, 10:52] Vinothpandian: 2018 (1) DRTC 710 : dwarika prasad vs state of Uttar pradesh : mortgaged property can be redeemed by tendering all dues , costs , charges and expenses before the date fixed for sale of transfer ( section.13(8) SRFASI act 2002 )[06/06, 10:52] Vinothpandian: Supreme court : Neelam manmohan Attavar vs manmohan Attavar MP no 42 of 2021 dated 5- 02- 2021 : litigant cannot be permitted to browbeat court by seeking bench of its choice[06/06, 10:52] Vinothpandian: 2018 (6) SCC 534 : oriental insurance company ltd vs Narbheram power and steel pvt ltd : Parties are bound by clauses of an insurance policy , courts cannot transplant any equity to the same , courts can interpret the policy but cannot make out a new contract[06/06, 10:52] Vinothpandian: 2019 (5) SCC 755 : Bharat broad band network ltd vs United telecoms ltd : when a person is approached in connection with his possible appointment as an arbitrator , it is his duty to disclose in writing any circumstances which are likely to give rise to justifiable doubts as to his independence or impartiality ( arbitration and conciliation act 1996 sec 34 )[06/06, 10:52] Vinothpandian: Supreme court: compack enterprises india ltd vs Beant singh SLP no 2224- 2225 of 2021 dated 17- 02-2021 : consent decree would not serve as estoppel., where compromise was vitiated by fraud , misrepresentation or mistake
[06/06, 10:52] Vinothpandian: 2018 (1) DRTC 710 : dwarika prasad vs state of Uttar pradesh : mortgaged property can be redeemed by tendering all dues , costs , charges and expenses before the date fixed for sale of transfer ( section.13(8) SRFASI act 2002 )
[06/06, 10:52] Vinothpandian: Supreme court : Neelam manmohan Attavar vs manmohan Attavar MP no 42 of 2021 dated 5- 02- 2021 : litigant cannot be permitted to browbeat court by seeking bench of its choice
[06/06, 10:52] Vinothpandian: 2018 (6) SCC 534 : oriental insurance company ltd vs Narbheram power and steel pvt ltd : Parties are bound by clauses of an insurance policy , courts cannot transplant any equity to the same , courts can interpret the policy but cannot make out a new contract
[06/06, 10:52] Vinothpandian: 2019 (5) SCC 755 : Bharat broad band network ltd vs United telecoms ltd : when a person is approached in connection with his possible appointment as an arbitrator , it is his duty to disclose in writing any circumstances which are likely to give rise to justifiable doubts as to his independence or impartiality ( arbitration and conciliation act 1996 sec 34 )
[06/06, 10:52] Vinothpandian: Supreme court: compack enterprises india ltd vs Beant singh SLP no 2224- 2225 of 2021 dated 17- 02-2021 : consent decree would not serve as estoppel., where compromise was vitiated by fraud , misrepresentation or mistake
