You may also like...
-
On perusal of the submissions, justice S S Sundar observed that Dharmar stood by his final report closing the counter case as mistake of fact as the case was a false one. The judge said that his action cannot be taken as a serious misconduct. The judge said the petitioner had explained to the second and third charges against him by stating that the deputy superintendent of police asked him not to go to the village due to emotional turbulence in the village after the murder. “It is a normal behaviour of any person from the victim’s family to complain about the inaction or inefficiency against the police official if something big happens. When serious charges are framed against the investigation officer alleging dereliction of duty, the allegations should be specific. In the present case, the allegations are too remote,” observed the judge.
by Sekar Reporter · Published June 17, 2020
-
[4/22, 21:08] sekarreporter1: https://youtube.com/shorts/jSllXy7XeOk?feature=share [4/22, 21:08] sekarreporter1: #shorts#ms krishnan# made lot of money #i earn clap only#vrsj# [4/22, 21:10] sekarreporter1: Msk is not public speaker He speak before judge but I am public speaker he made lot of money I earned clap grsj நகை சுவை பேச்சில் வல்லவர் [4/22, 21:10] sekarreporter1: 💐🌹
by Sekar Reporter · Published April 22, 2023
-
S.m.subramaniyam judge full order regarding.corruption
by Sekar Reporter · Published October 11, 2020