08/06, 10:53] Vinothpandian: 1975 CRI LJ 1756 : pali Ram vs state : In a criminal trial proceedings the court can direct any person to write words or figures to enable the court to compare the words or figures so written with any words or figures alleged to have been written by such person

[08/06, 10:53] Vinothpandian: 1975 CRI LJ 1756 : pali Ram vs state : In a criminal trial proceedings the court can direct any person to write words or figures to enable the court to compare the words or figures so written with any words or figures alleged to have been written by such person
[08/06, 10:53] Vinothpandian: 1996 CRI LJ 3983 : BK subbarao vs K parasaram : No litigant has a right to unlimited drought on the court time and public money in order to get his affairs settled in the manner as he wishes , easy access to justice should not be misused as a licence to file misconceived and frivolous petitions
[08/06, 10:53] Vinothpandian: 2015(3) CTC 1 : Ranganathan vs narayanan : limitation act 1963 section 3 : court can adjudicate issue of limitation even in absence of defence raised by defendant
[08/06, 10:53] Vinothpandian: 2014(4) CTC 315 : Rajagopalan vs Gnanapandithan : Held non _ issuance of reply or counter affidavit by itself is not ground for allowing applications
[08/06, 10:53] Vinothpandian: 1996(8) SCC 369 : dilwan Singh vs state of Haryana : when neither AD card nor unserved original notice is recieved back ,the notice must be held to be deemed service
[08/06, 10:53] Vinothpandian: 2020 (5) CTC 145 : Integrated finance co ltd vs garware marine industries : suit cannot be transferred to commercial division merely because related suit is pending before commercial division issues raised in plaint should be commercial in nature

You may also like...