No relief for Infosys as Madras high court asks firm to pay Rs 2.5crore power tariff

You may also like...

• 

  fresh acquisition can be made for distributing the land for the 37 beneficiaries already identified by the respondents. Therefore, it is left open to State to take a final call on the liberty given to them in the impugned order. 15. Thus, we find no merits in the Writ Appeal and accordingly W.A.No.2632 of 2022 is dismissed. There is no order as to Costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. (T.R.,A.C.J.) (D.B.C, J.) 23.03.2023 Index : yes Speaking order Neutral citation : yes klt To 1. The Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu, Adhi Dravidar Welfare Department, Fort St.George, Chennai – 600 009. 2. The District Collector, Office of the District Collector, Villupuram, Villupuram District. 3. The District Adhi Dravidar Welfare Officer, Villupuram, Villupuram District. 4. The Special Tahsildar, Land Acquisition & Adhi Dravidar Welfare, Gingee, Villupuram District. THE HON’BLE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J., klt Pre-Delivery Judgment in W.A.No.2632 of 2022 and C.M.P.No.21067 of 2022 23.03.2023 gp muthu kumar

  March 23, 2023

   by Sekar Reporter · Published March 23, 2023

• 

  My experience as a advocate mhc acj speech

  December 9, 2021

   by Sekar Reporter · Published December 9, 2021

• 

  Justices G.R. Swaminathan and B. Pugalendhi directed the petitioners from Madurai district to vacate the premises in six months

  April 15, 2023

   by Sekar Reporter · Published April 15, 2023