7 law tips Vinothpandian: 2009 (6) SCC 77 : SvL murthy vs state : section 6 banking regulation act : cheque discounting facility to the customer by bank is not a wrong practice[20/06, 15:03] Vinothpandian: 2019(5) CTC 803 : Ram parshotam mittal vs hotel queen road pvt ltd : observation in interim order not binding for purpose of deciding matter finally

[20/06, 15:03] Vinothpandian: 2009 (6) SCC 77 : SvL murthy vs state : section 6 banking regulation act : cheque discounting facility to the customer by bank is not a wrong practice
[20/06, 15:03] Vinothpandian: 2019(5) CTC 803 : Ram parshotam mittal vs hotel queen road pvt ltd : observation in interim order not binding for purpose of deciding matter finally
[20/06, 15:03] Vinothpandian: AIR 1997 SC 448 : chintaman vs state of maharastra : mere oral evidence of sole transactions without filing certified copy of sale deed cannot make them admissible
[20/06, 15:03] Vinothpandian: 2016(5) CTC 117 : sarasu vs Ravi : sec 5 limitation act : Application for condoning delay filed under sec 5 to be dealt with liberally and leniently in order to do substantial justice to parties ,length of delay not a material factor for deciding application under section 5 of limitation act
[20/06, 15:03] Vinothpandian: 2017 (6) MLJ 489 : U manjunath rao vs U chandrasekar & another : A judge has to constantly remind himself that absence of reason in process of adjudication makes ultimate decision pregnable (sec 96 CPC 1908 ” reason is life of law ” )
[20/06, 15:03] Vinothpandian: 2021 (1) CTC 577 : Enkay visions ( P) ltd chennai vs Doordarshan rep by its director general , new delhi : sec 34 of CPC 1908 provides for interest to be awarded from date of institution of plaint and not from date of decree
[20/06, 15:03] Vinothpandian: 2018(4) BC 220 : Harinarayan G bajaj & others vs reliance captial : Relief sought by parties should not be refused on technical and pedantic grounds ,powers of court are wide with respect to moulding reliefs in interest of justice