[04/07, 10:44] Vinothpandian: 2021 (3) CTC 274 : Ravindran OP vs MS subbaiah : Post – trial amendment permissible , if proposed amendment is bonafide , relevant and necessary for deciding rights of parties to litigation ( order 6 rule 17 CPC 1908 )[04/07, 10:44] Vinothpandian: 2015 (2) crimes 133 SC : shamina farooqui vs shahid khan : consideration for calculating or determination of maintenance all aspects of financial capability of the husband to be considered ( sec 125 CRPC 1973 )[04/07, 10:44] Vinothpandian: 2006 (3) RCR ( criminal ) 265 SC : Hari singh vs state of UP : A person apprehending threat to his life and property , if he seeks any protection , it is the duty of the concerned police officials to provide such security as are warranted in the circumstances in accordance with law[04/07, 10:44] Vinothpandian: 2020 (5) CTC 865 : state of madhya pradesh rep by additional director of agriculture vs intellectual property , appellate board : order 8 CPC 1908 : written submissions enable parties to lis to substantiate their pleadings , do not have evidentary value , non consideration of averments made in written submission will not make judicial order invalid
[04/07, 10:44] Vinothpandian: 2021 (3) CTC 274 : Ravindran OP vs MS subbaiah : Post – trial amendment permissible , if proposed amendment is bonafide , relevant and necessary for deciding rights of parties to litigation ( order 6 rule 17 CPC 1908 )
[04/07, 10:44] Vinothpandian: 2015 (2) crimes 133 SC : shamina farooqui vs shahid khan : consideration for calculating or determination of maintenance all aspects of financial capability of the husband to be considered ( sec 125 CRPC 1973 )
[04/07, 10:44] Vinothpandian: 2006 (3) RCR ( criminal ) 265 SC : Hari singh vs state of UP : A person apprehending threat to his life and property , if he seeks any protection , it is the duty of the concerned police officials to provide such security as are warranted in the circumstances in accordance with law
[04/07, 10:44] Vinothpandian: 2020 (5) CTC 865 : state of madhya pradesh rep by additional director of agriculture vs intellectual property , appellate board : order 8 CPC 1908 : written submissions enable parties to lis to substantiate their pleadings , do not have evidentary value , non consideration of averments made in written submission will not make judicial order invalid
