SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

[03/09, 10:27] Vinothpandian: 2012 (2) DRTC 351 : Gulshan Rai jain & others vs DRAT Allahabad ; DRT / DRAT cannot keep appeal pending for indefinite period under garb of interim orders , non – disposal of appeal within statutory period shall frustrate very object of statute ( SARFASI act )[03/09, 10:27] Vinothpandian: AIR 2018 SC 4647 : Achpal @ Ramswaroop vs state of Rajasthan : With regard to extension of period for completing investigation , no court could either directly or indirectly extend such period , mere recording of submission of public prosecutor could not be taken to be an order granting extension[03/09, 10:27] Vinothpandian: AIR 2018 SC 5128 : kamala vs MR mohan kumar : unlike matrimonial proceedings where strict proof of marriage is essential , in the proceedings under section 125 of CRPC , such strict standard of proof is not necessary as it is summary in nature meant to prevent vagrancy[03/09, 10:27] Vinothpandian: 2005 (2) crimes 230 : Rajendra sail vs madhya pradesh high court bar association : Judgements of courts are public documents and can be commented upon , analyzed and criticized , but it has to be in dignified manner without attributing motives

by ·

[03/09, 10:27]

[03/09, 10:27] Vinothpandian: 2012 (2) DRTC 351 : Gulshan Rai jain & others vs DRAT Allahabad ; DRT / DRAT cannot keep appeal pending for indefinite period under garb of interim orders , non – disposal of appeal within statutory period shall frustrate very object of statute ( SARFASI act )
[03/09, 10:27] Vinothpandian: AIR 2018 SC 4647 : Achpal @ Ramswaroop vs state of Rajasthan : With regard to extension of period for completing investigation , no court could either directly or indirectly extend such period , mere recording of submission of public prosecutor could not be taken to be an order granting extension
[03/09, 10:27] Vinothpandian: AIR 2018 SC 5128 : kamala vs MR mohan kumar : unlike matrimonial proceedings where strict proof of marriage is essential , in the proceedings under section 125 of CRPC , such strict standard of proof is not necessary as it is summary in nature meant to prevent vagrancy
[03/09, 10:27] Vinothpandian: 2005 (2) crimes 230 : Rajendra sail vs madhya pradesh high court bar association : Judgements of courts are public documents and can be commented upon , analyzed and criticized , but it has to be in dignified manner without attributing motives

: 2012 (2) DRTC 351 : Gulshan Rai jain & others vs DRAT Allahabad ; DRT / DRAT cannot keep appeal pending for indefinite period under garb of interim orders , non – disposal of appeal within statutory period shall frustrate very object of statute ( SARFASI act )
[03/09, 10:27] Vinothpandian: AIR 2018 SC 4647 : Achpal @ Ramswaroop vs state of Rajasthan : With regard to extension of period for completing investigation , no court could either directly or indirectly extend such period , mere recording of submission of public prosecutor could not be taken to be an order granting extension
[03/09, 10:27] Vinothpandian: AIR 2018 SC 5128 : kamala vs MR mohan kumar : unlike matrimonial proceedings where strict proof of marriage is essential , in the proceedings under section 125 of CRPC , such strict standard of proof is not necessary as it is summary in nature meant to prevent vagrancy
[03/09, 10:27] Vinothpandian: 2005 (2) crimes 230 : Rajendra sail vs madhya pradesh high court bar association : Judgements of courts are public documents and can be commented upon , analyzed and criticized , but it has to be in dignified manner without attributing motives

You may also like...