[05/09, 10:12] Vinothpandian: 2018(6) CTC 590 ( DB) : V Santhi vs k Kumar ; Hindu marriage act 1955 sec 13(1)(1-a) : Held indulging in character assassination of spouse and failure to substantiate it in manner known to law is cruelty as it would cause actute mental pain and agony to other spouse[05/09, 10:12] Vinothpandian: 2019(6) CTC 9 : V manimegalai vs Selvaraj Kannan : TN regulation of rights and responsibilities of land lords and tenants act 2017 section 4 – A ( c) : effect of non – registration of tenancy agreement with rent authority ,non – registration would only render agreement not having evidentiary value ,held registration is not a pre condition for approaching rent court invoking provisions of section 21 for recovery of possession[05/09, 10:12] Vinothpandian: 2016(4) CTC 92 : Axis bank vs SBS organics Pvt Ltd : SARFASi act 2002 sec 18 : Held pre – deposit made by borrower with tribunal would not empower bank to claim general lien ,banker cannot exercise right of general lien against pre – deposit amount deposited by borrower[05/09, 10:12] Vinothpandian: 2019(6) CTC 62 : C Rangaraj vs inspector general of registration ,santhome : Registration act 1908 sec 22- A : Registering authority cannot act like post office and register any document presented if manifest lack of title apparent ,registering authority cannot register document[05/09, 10:12] Vinothpandian: 2015(3) CTC 1 : Ranganathan vs narayanan : limitation act 1963 section 3 : court can adjudicate issue of limitation even in absence of defence raised by defendant

[05/09, 10:12] Vinothpandian: 2018(6) CTC 590 ( DB) : V Santhi vs k Kumar ; Hindu marriage act 1955 sec 13(1)(1-a) : Held indulging in character assassination of spouse and failure to substantiate it in manner known to law is cruelty as it would cause actute mental pain and agony to other spouse
[05/09, 10:12] Vinothpandian: 2019(6) CTC 9 : V manimegalai vs Selvaraj Kannan : TN regulation of rights and responsibilities of land lords and tenants act 2017 section 4 – A ( c) : effect of non – registration of tenancy agreement with rent authority ,non – registration would only render agreement not having evidentiary value ,held registration is not a pre condition for approaching rent court invoking provisions of section 21 for recovery of possession
[05/09, 10:12] Vinothpandian: 2016(4) CTC 92 : Axis bank vs SBS organics Pvt Ltd : SARFASi act 2002 sec 18 : Held pre – deposit made by borrower with tribunal would not empower bank to claim general lien ,banker cannot exercise right of general lien against pre – deposit amount deposited by borrower
[05/09, 10:12] Vinothpandian: 2019(6) CTC 62 : C Rangaraj vs inspector general of registration ,santhome : Registration act 1908 sec 22- A : Registering authority cannot act like post office and register any document presented if manifest lack of title apparent ,registering authority cannot register document
[05/09, 10:12] Vinothpandian: 2015(3) CTC 1 : Ranganathan vs narayanan : limitation act 1963 section 3 : court can adjudicate issue of limitation even in absence of defence raised by defendant

[05/09, 10:12] Vinothpandian: 2018(6) CTC 590 ( DB) : V Santhi vs k Kumar ; Hindu marriage act 1955 sec 13(1)(1-a) : Held indulging in character assassination of spouse and failure to substantiate it in manner known to law is cruelty as it would cause actute mental pain and agony to other spouse
[05/09, 10:12] Vinothpandian: 2019(6) CTC 9 : V manimegalai vs Selvaraj Kannan : TN regulation of rights and responsibilities of land lords and tenants act 2017 section 4 – A ( c) : effect of non – registration of tenancy agreement with rent authority ,non – registration would only render agreement not having evidentiary value ,held registration is not a pre condition for approaching rent court invoking provisions of section 21 for recovery of possession
[05/09, 10:12] Vinothpandian: 2016(4) CTC 92 : Axis bank vs SBS organics Pvt Ltd : SARFASi act 2002 sec 18 : Held pre – deposit made by borrower with tribunal would not empower bank to claim general lien ,banker cannot exercise right of general lien against pre – deposit amount deposited by borrower
[05/09, 10:12] Vinothpandian: 2019(6) CTC 62 : C Rangaraj vs inspector general of registration ,santhome : Registration act 1908 sec 22- A : Registering authority cannot act like post office and register any document presented if manifest lack of title apparent ,registering authority cannot register document
[05/09, 10:12] Vinothpandian: 2015(3) CTC 1 : Ranganathan vs narayanan : limitation act 1963 section 3 : court can adjudicate issue of limitation even in absence of defence raised by defendant

You may also like...