The Supreme Court on Friday directed the Registrar General of the Madras High Court to submit a detailed report in a sealed cover regarding the handling of a quashing petition filed by an accused in a Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) case. [MS Jaffar Sait v. Enforcement Directorate]

“
Subscribe
News
Columns
Interviews
Law Firms
Apprentice Lawyer
Legal Jobs
हिंदी
ಕನ್ನಡ

News
Supreme Court asks Madras High Court for report on re-hearing of quashed PMLA case
After quashing a PMLA case in which the predicate offence had been quashed, two days later, the same Bench of the High Court decided to re-hear the matter.

Madras High Court and Supreme Court

Anadi Tewari
Published on: 
06 Sep 2024, 1:15 pm
2 min read
The Supreme Court on Friday directed the Registrar General of the Madras High Court to submit a detailed report in a sealed cover regarding the handling of a quashing petition filed by an accused in a Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) case. [MS Jaffar Sait v. Enforcement Directorate]

A Bench of Justices Abhay S Oka and Augustine George Masih issued the direction after Senior Advocate Sidharth Luthra, representing the accused, informed the Court that the case had been shown as quashed before it was unexpectedly listed again for hearing.

The Court also stayed all proceedings before the High Court until further orders and listed the matter for hearing on September 30.

Justice Abhay S Oka and Justice Augustine George Masih
The money laundering case was filed by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) against retired Indian Police Service (IPS) officer Jaffar Sait.

On August 21, a Bench of Justices SM Subramaniam and V Sivagnanam quashed the ED’s complaint against Sait.

Two days later, on August 23, the same Bench recalled its August 21 order and decided to re-hear the matter on merits.

Also Read
Heated exchange in Madras High Court after Bench recalls its order quashing ED case
The case against Sait involves allegations that he illegally acquired a Tamil Nadu Housing Board plot of land in 2011. A corruption case registered in the matter against Sait by the Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption (DVAC) was quashed by the Madras High Court in 2019.

Sait then moved the High Court seeking the quashing of the ED’s complaint in the matter as well.

On August 21, the Court quashed the Enforcement Case Information Report (ECIR) after noting that the predicate case (DVAC case) had already been quashed.

However, on August 23, a Bench of Justices Subramaniam and R Sakthivel questioned the ED on money laundering cases fizzling out before reaching their logical conclusion, owing to the quashing of the predicate offence FIRs.

This Bench went on to say that cases registered by the ED under the PMLA cannot be allowed to be washed away.

The Court added that it will examine the issue in detail. It also asked the ED’s counsel to submit explanations to the queries regarding the dropping of money laundering cases, particularly against former IPS officer Jaffar Sait.

This exchange then prompted the Court to revoke the August 21 order and rehear Sait’s plea. The Court eventually reserved its order in the matter.

Madras High CourtSupreme Court of IndiaEnforcement DirectoratePrevention of Money Laundering Act

News
Supreme Court to hear CBI challenge to order terming arrest of Chanda Kochhar, Deepak Kochhar ‘illegal’
The Bombay High Court had passed the order under challenge while confirming the interim bail granted to ICICI Bank’s former CEO Chanda Kochhar and her husband Deepak Kochhar in the Videocon loan case.

Chanda Kochhar and Deepak Kochhar

Abhimanyu Hazarika
Published on: 
06 Sep 2024, 12:55 pm
2 min read
The Supreme Court on Friday issued notice on a plea challenging a Bombay High Court order that had held the Central Bureau of Investigation’s (CBI) arrest of ICICI Bank’s former MD and CEO Chanda Kochhar and her husband Deepak Kochhar in the Videocon loan case to be illegal [CBI vs Chanda Kochhar and ors].

A Bench of Justices Sanjiv Khanna and PV Sanjay Kumar passed the order issuing notice after hearing preliminary submissions by Additional Solicitor General SV Raju who represented the CBI.

Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Justice PV Sanjay Kumar
The appeal was filed against an order passed by the Bombay High Court in February this year.

By this order, the High Court co