![[12/25, 11:07] Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1342343683471896576?s=08 [12/25, 11:07] Sekarreporter1: https://t.co/9axB9f5Ete. Shop eviction notice by corporation uphelp navj for corporation aag s r rajagopal argued https://t.co/ZEORxr7CW1 full order](https://sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story ₹1 lakh costs on woman for not cooperating to quash Section 498A case
- Previous story [14/09, 18:00] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1834932640316522974?t=MEZKZjJqXCH8OmVP-S78IQ&s=08[14/09, 18:00] sekarreporter1: Today click mhaa president mohanakrishnan with sc judge MM sundaresh[14/09, 18:00] sekarreporter1: 👍👍🌹🌹
Recent Posts
- The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court directed Virudhunagar district administration to file a report on the action taken against Thiruchuli tahsildar, who permitted removal of seemai karuvelam trees in Kiruthumal river in Uluthimadai village panchayat, without auction.
- Supreme Court rejects review petition against judgment allowing sub-classification of SC/STsA seven-judge Constitution bench led by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud was of the view that no case for review was made out by the petitioners.CJI DY Chandrachud led 7-judge bench to hear SC ST sub-category caseCJI DY Chandrachud led 7-judge bench to hear SC ST sub-category case
- Writ Petition No.28589 of 2024N.ANAND VENKATESH, JThis writ petition has been filed challenging the proceedings ofthe third respondent dated 05.09.2024 and for a consequential direction to the respondents to allocate duty to the petitioner only to the hearing impaired students studying in the fifth respondent school and to consider the request made by the petitioner to grant/sanction leave to the petitioner on Government holidays.for petner kavitha adv argued
- [06/10, 15:28] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1842866950583591292?t=B3osCuxBnWBM7AcWaXCcfQ&s=08[06/10, 15:28] sekarreporter1: Justice Kannadasan at the Air Show Celebration along with his daughter Keerthana Arulnithi and grandchildren Mazhilan Arulnithi and Saaral Arulnithi.[06/10, 15:29] sekarreporter1: 👍👍🌹🌹
- தலைமை நீதிபதி கே.ஆர்.ஸ்ரீராம் மற்றும் நீதிபதி டி.கிருஷ்ணகுமார் அமர்வு, கடந்த 2017ம் ஆண்டே கூடுதல் ஊதியத் தொகையை திரும்பச் செலுத்திய மனுதாரர், மூன்று ஆண்டுகளுக்கு பின் உயர்நீதிமன்றத்தில் வழக்கு தாக்கல் செய்துள்ளதாகக் கூறி, தனி நீதிபதி உத்தரவை ரத்து செய்து உத்தரவிட்டது.
More
Recent Posts
- The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court directed Virudhunagar district administration to file a report on the action taken against Thiruchuli tahsildar, who permitted removal of seemai karuvelam trees in Kiruthumal river in Uluthimadai village panchayat, without auction.
- Supreme Court rejects review petition against judgment allowing sub-classification of SC/STsA seven-judge Constitution bench led by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud was of the view that no case for review was made out by the petitioners.CJI DY Chandrachud led 7-judge bench to hear SC ST sub-category caseCJI DY Chandrachud led 7-judge bench to hear SC ST sub-category case
- Writ Petition No.28589 of 2024N.ANAND VENKATESH, JThis writ petition has been filed challenging the proceedings ofthe third respondent dated 05.09.2024 and for a consequential direction to the respondents to allocate duty to the petitioner only to the hearing impaired students studying in the fifth respondent school and to consider the request made by the petitioner to grant/sanction leave to the petitioner on Government holidays.for petner kavitha adv argued
- [06/10, 15:28] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1842866950583591292?t=B3osCuxBnWBM7AcWaXCcfQ&s=08[06/10, 15:28] sekarreporter1: Justice Kannadasan at the Air Show Celebration along with his daughter Keerthana Arulnithi and grandchildren Mazhilan Arulnithi and Saaral Arulnithi.[06/10, 15:29] sekarreporter1: 👍👍🌹🌹
- தலைமை நீதிபதி கே.ஆர்.ஸ்ரீராம் மற்றும் நீதிபதி டி.கிருஷ்ணகுமார் அமர்வு, கடந்த 2017ம் ஆண்டே கூடுதல் ஊதியத் தொகையை திரும்பச் செலுத்திய மனுதாரர், மூன்று ஆண்டுகளுக்கு பின் உயர்நீதிமன்றத்தில் வழக்கு தாக்கல் செய்துள்ளதாகக் கூறி, தனி நீதிபதி உத்தரவை ரத்து செய்து உத்தரவிட்டது.