Rubt mhc advt life story 4th day very interesting by Sekar Reporter · April 7, 2020 [4/7, 16:18] Rubt Three: I was engaged to conduct a COFEPOSA case in 1984 I had been to prison to collect all papers furnished to detnue by Pondicherry Customs to file WP. It was the 1st COFEPOSA case in Pondicherry and officers were unaware of the procedures. The Superintendent of Prison blindly refused permission and told it’s the Home Secretary to grant permission. I met him and explained that without detention order and all other connected papers furnished to detenue detention order cannot be challenged in High Court yet he did not permit and told me to get order from High Court. He refused permission to me to buy Pondicherry (Security) Prisoners Act from Govt Press and this Act deals with COFEPOSA dentenue. It consisted of 13 Sections. I managed to get Xerox copy and challenged the entire Act as unconstitutional and violative of Article 14 21& 22 of Constitution of India with WMP to interview the Detnue to collect materials to file WP. To my utter surprise at the admission stage itself it was dismissed. I went on an appeal & it came before Chandurkar CJ Bench. CJ was shocked to see that number of sections of the Act has been challenged and told me to argue. He heared my arguments in detail as to how those sections are violative and it went on for more than a hour at admission stage. Pondicherry Govt Pleader cum PP Late Govindsamy who later became Judge of our High Court was present and CJ told him We find that there is force in my argument to claim the sections of the Act is unconstitutional.Take notice and inform your govt to amend them or else we will strike them. The interim order of the CJ was U can meet the detenue during Counsel visiting hours. Late Govindsamy on the next hearing date informed the Court that Govt has amended the Sections and accordingly it was disposed.[4/7, 16:19] Sekarreporter 1: 🌹🌹🌹
Justice RMT Teekaa Raman made out criminal contempt against a petitioner who escaped to Singapore by not complying with the court’s order and directed the registry of the Madras High Court to place the matter before another court. August 20, 2023 by Sekar Reporter · Published August 20, 2023
Supreme Court fines Prashant Bhushan Re1 August 31, 2020 by Sekar Reporter · Published August 31, 2020
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICEN.SATHISHKUMAR W.P.No.2758 of 2023 The Federal Bank Ltd. For Petitioner : Mr.A.V.Radhakrishnan For Respondent No.1 : Mr.YogeshKannadasan, Special Govt. Pleader In view of the foregoing reasons, the respondent cannot refuse to register the Sale Certificate as sought for by the petitioner. Consequently, the impugned order in Na.Ka.No.538/2022 dated 17.10.2022 is quashed. The first respondent is directed to register the Sale certificate within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of the order. With the above directions, the writ petition is allowed. No costs. February 14, 2023 by Sekar Reporter · Published February 14, 2023