You may also like...
-
-
HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY A.S.No.958 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 and C.M.P.No.20135 of 2021 Answers to the Issues : 20. In view of my answers to the questions, I find that the findings and conclusions reached by the Trial Court in respect of issue No.1, in the Original Suit, that the defendants 1 and 2 have borrowed a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- and Rs.3,00,000/- from the plaintiff on 15.06.1999 and 20.09.1999 respectively, as correct. I also concur with the Trial Court in answering issue No.2, in the Original Suit
by Sekar Reporter · Published February 8, 2023
-
In the result, this Court does not find any ground to interfere with the Award passed by the Arbitrator and as confirmed by the District Court under Section 34 of the Act and accordingly, this Appeal stands dismissed. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, there will be no order as to costs. [J.N.B., J.] [N.A.V., J.] 10.10.2022. THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J. NISHA BANU and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH C.M.A.(MD)No.834 of 2011
by Sekar Reporter · Published October 10, 2022