You may also like...
-
6/25, 07:30] Sekarreporter: *GLIMPSE OF A LATEST VERDICT* *C.M.A. No. 615/2018, 4054/2019* Mr. D. Sivakumar Vs. Mrs. Parimala Dated: 11.06.2021 *Hon’ble Justice T. Raja and Justice G. Chandrasekharan* set aside the impugned order with to maintenance but not on order refusing grant of divorce herein in this matter relating to *“
by Sekar Reporter · Published June 25, 2021
-
In the present case, this Court has already held supra that the respondents have no evidence or material to prove the allegation of misappropriation and there is no subjective satisfaction and no prior notice was issued before appointing the Fit person. Moreover, the respondents have not mentioned any period for appointing the Fit person. Therefore the appointment of Fit person is illegal and the impugned order is liable to be quashed and accordingly quashed. 22. The petitioner is at liberty to file appropriate petition / suit to establish the temple as denomination temple and the same shall be filed within a period of four weeks. 23. With the above observations and directions, this Writ Petition is allowed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, W.M.P.(MD)No. 18126 of 2023 is allowed and M.P(MD)Nos.1 & 2 of 2014 are closed. Index : Yes / No 21.09.2023 Internet : ksa Yes To 1. The Commissioner, Hindu Religious Charitable and Endowments Department, Chennai-34. 2. The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious Charitable and Endowments Department, Tirunelveli. 3. The Assistant Commissioner, Hindu Religious Charitable and Endowments Department, Thoothukudi-2. 4. The Executive Officer, Arulmigu Povanatha Swamy Thiru Kovil, Kovilpatti, Thoothukudi District. S.SRIMATHY, J ksa Order made in W.P.(MD)No.13749 of 2014 21.09.2023
by Sekar Reporter · Published October 17, 2023
-