Follow:
- Next story THE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA O.P.No.549 of 2019 & A.No.4849 of 2019 M/s.Resurgent Power Projects Limited–Jurisdiction under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, does not find any ground for interference. The Original Petition stands dismissed.
- Previous story CHANDRU LAW ACADEMY inviting you to a lecture on Subject: ” THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE 1973” BY.ADVOCATE R.CHANDRASEKARAN – 73396 50446 Organised by. Advocate D.Hemamalini Date: 4th MAY 2020 Monday Timing: 11.30am to 12.30pm *Note: Link will be sent to the registered participants only For registration contact: +91 95660 43755 / 9884402604
Recent Posts
- Quashing the refusal slip provided by Rasipuram sub-registrar, the judge said, “The official’s decision to not register a sale deed presented by the petitioner since an appeal is pending as against the preliminary decree cannot be sustained in the eye of law. Despite judicial pronouncements, registrations are refused citing internal department circulars. It is not open to the registering authorities to interpret the judgement and decide whether the facts are applied to the particular case or not,” HC noted.
- Madurai Srinivas Ragavan: சுப்ரீம் கோர்ட்டுக்கு இன்று முதல் புதிய இணையதளம்- வழக்கு விசாரணையை நேரலையில் காணலாம்
- 4/05, 00:10] DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Vineeta Sharma vs Rakesh Sharma reported in AIR 2020 SC 3717 held that:
- இட ஒதுக்கீடு வரலாறு advocate A. Saravanan
- [03/05, 20:52] sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/cGUt8iBk5cQ?si=UCGS1VjofK0d0NCs[03/05, 20:52] sekarreporter1: 👍
More
Recent Posts
- Quashing the refusal slip provided by Rasipuram sub-registrar, the judge said, “The official’s decision to not register a sale deed presented by the petitioner since an appeal is pending as against the preliminary decree cannot be sustained in the eye of law. Despite judicial pronouncements, registrations are refused citing internal department circulars. It is not open to the registering authorities to interpret the judgement and decide whether the facts are applied to the particular case or not,” HC noted.
- Madurai Srinivas Ragavan: சுப்ரீம் கோர்ட்டுக்கு இன்று முதல் புதிய இணையதளம்- வழக்கு விசாரணையை நேரலையில் காணலாம்
- 4/05, 00:10] DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Vineeta Sharma vs Rakesh Sharma reported in AIR 2020 SC 3717 held that:
- இட ஒதுக்கீடு வரலாறு advocate A. Saravanan
- [03/05, 20:52] sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/cGUt8iBk5cQ?si=UCGS1VjofK0d0NCs[03/05, 20:52] sekarreporter1: 👍