You may also like...
-
13.The case on hand does not deal with any major alteration as contemplated under Section 52(1) of the Act supra. The alterations have been made only to adapt the vehicle to make it more user friendly for the petitioner, who is physically challenged to make ingress and egress into and out of the vehicle easier. Neither the definition under Section 2(1) nor Section 52 specifies that it is the person, for whose purpose, the adaption is made, who should ride the vehicle. On the contrary, the definition of adapted vehicle makes it clear that the vehicle should be used solely by or “for such person”. Therefore, in the instant case, the adaption is made for the use of the petitioner and taking into account the Government Order, which provides for the exemption, the Writ Petition is allowed, directing the respondent/Registering Authority to apply the Government Order referred supra and grant exemption to the petitioner. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Speaking : Yes / No 13.03.2023 NCC : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Index : Yes / No mm To 1.The Secretary to the Government of Tamil Nadu, Department of Transport, Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009. 2.The Transport Commissioner, Transport Department, Chepauk, Chennai 600 005. 3.The Assistant Transport Commissioner, Transport Department, Tanjore District. 4.The District Collector, District Collector Office, Pudukkottai 622 005. 5.The Regional Transport Officer, Regional Transport Office, Pudukottai District. P.T.ASHA, J. mm W.P.(MD) No.1480 of 2023 13.03.2023
by Sekar Reporter · Published April 5, 2023
-
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 04.08.2021 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR CRP PD(MD).No.1060 of 2021 and C.M.P.(MD)Nos.6199 and 6200 of 2021 1. M.Sukumar 2. M.Seethalakshmi 3. M.Duraipandi 4.Bhagavathi : Petitioners/Respondents Vs. 1.R.Suvitha 2.Minor Sairam 3.Minor Sai Lakshmanan : Respondents /Petitioners (Minor respondents 2 & 3 are represented by their mother and natural guardian/first respondent) PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to set aside the proceedings made in D.V.C.No.9 of 2021 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Virudhunagar. For Petitioners : Mr.T.Sathiyananthan O R D E R The Civil Revision Petition has been filed seeking orders to quash the proceedings in D.V.C.No.9 of 2021 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Virudhunagar.
by Sekar Reporter · Published November 10, 2021
-
[3/3, 07:18] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1234656826379194369?s=08 [3/3, 07:18] Sekarreporter 1: File response on plea seeking action against anti-CAA protests: Madras HC to Tamil Nadu government – https://www.newindianexpress.com/states/tamil-nadu/2020/mar/02/file-response-on-plea-seeking-action-against-anti-caa-protests-madras-hc-to-tamil-nadu-government-2111166.html
by Sekar Reporter · Published March 3, 2020