SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

Author: Sekar Reporter

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH W.P.No.8326 of 2019& WMP.No.8871 of 2019 Pondicherry Institute of Medical Sciences, Represented by its Chairman: Dr.K.Jacob, Kalapet, Puducherry-605014          For Petitioner     : Mr.Abhishek Jenasenan                     For Respondents : Mr.J.Kumaran [R1]                                                     Additional Government Pleader                                                     Mr.T.P.Manoharan                                                     Senior Counsel for                                                                                    Mr.T.M.Naveen [R2]                                                     O R D E R                                                         … Petitioner Vs. 1.The Government of Puducherry. impugned order is set aside and the matter remanded to the file of the authority for denovo adjudication. The authority is directed to hear the petitioner and pass a speaking order in regard to the claim of exemption, bearing in mind the 1999 Regulations and subsequent amendments

Uncategorized

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH W.P.No.8326 of 2019& WMP.No.8871 of 2019 Pondicherry Institute of Medical Sciences, Represented by its Chairman: Dr.K.Jacob, Kalapet, Puducherry-605014          For Petitioner     : Mr.Abhishek Jenasenan                     For Respondents : Mr.J.Kumaran [R1]                                                     Additional Government Pleader                                                     Mr.T.P.Manoharan                                                     Senior Counsel for                                                                                    Mr.T.M.Naveen [R2]                                                     O R D E R                                                         … Petitioner Vs. 1.The Government of Puducherry. impugned order is set aside and the matter remanded to the file of the authority for denovo adjudication. The authority is directed to hear the petitioner and pass a speaking order in regard to the claim of exemption, bearing in mind the 1999 Regulations and subsequent amendments

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 08.07.2022 CORAM THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH W.P.No.8326 of 2019& WMP.No.8871 of 2019   Pondicherry Institute of Medical Sciences, Represented by its Chairman: Dr.K.Jacob,...

Madras high court order sep 20 th day

Uncategorized

Madras high court order sep 20 th day

  [9/20, 11:37] Sekarreporter1: அதிமுக இடைக்காலப் பொதுச் செயலாளராக எடப்பாடி பழனிசாமி தேர்ந்தெடுக்கப்பட்ட பொதுக்குழு தீர்மானங்களை அங்கீகரிக்க கூடாது என உத்தரவிடக் கோரி தொடரப்பட்ட வழக்கை சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றம் இரண்டு வாரத்திற்கு ஒத்திவைத்துள்ளது.. திண்டுக்கல் மாவட்டம் களத்துப்பட்டியை சேர்ந்த அதிமுக உறுப்பினர் எஸ். சூரியமூர்த்தி என்பவர்...

Madras high court sep 20th orders

Uncategorized

Madras high court sep 20th orders

  [9/20, 11:37] Sekarreporter1: அதிமுக இடைக்காலப் பொதுச் செயலாளராக எடப்பாடி பழனிசாமி தேர்ந்தெடுக்கப்பட்ட பொதுக்குழு தீர்மானங்களை அங்கீகரிக்க கூடாது என உத்தரவிடக் கோரி தொடரப்பட்ட வழக்கை சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றம் இரண்டு வாரத்திற்கு ஒத்திவைத்துள்ளது.. திண்டுக்கல் மாவட்டம் களத்துப்பட்டியை சேர்ந்த அதிமுக உறுப்பினர் எஸ். சூரியமூர்த்தி என்பவர்...

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J. NISHA BANU and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH C.M.A.(MD)No.181 this Court is inclined to impose exorbitant cost of Rs.1,00,000/-(Rupees one lakh only) payable by the claimants/appellants to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre attached to the Madurai Bench, within a period of four (4) weeks

Uncategorized

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J. NISHA BANU and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH C.M.A.(MD)No.181 this Court is inclined to impose exorbitant cost of Rs.1,00,000/-(Rupees one lakh only) payable by the claimants/appellants to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre attached to the Madurai Bench, within a period of four (4) weeks

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT RESERVED ON : 16.09.2022 DELIVERED ON : 20.09.2022 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J. NISHA BANU and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH C.M.A.(MD)No.181 of 2017 1.Rajendran...

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM WP No.31012 of 2017   For Petitioner                         :  Mr.Ravi Shanmugam           For Respondents                        :  Mr.K.H.Ravikumar,                                                                  Government Advocate. O R D E R police order quashed and the third respondent is directed to reconsider and impose any other penalty other than the penalty of removal from service, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Further, the respondents are directed to reinstate the petitioner in service without backwages but with continuity of service.          With the abovesaid directions, the writ petition stands allowed.  However, there shall be no order as to costs.               

Uncategorized

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM WP No.31012 of 2017   For Petitioner                         :  Mr.Ravi Shanmugam           For Respondents                        :  Mr.K.H.Ravikumar,                                                                  Government Advocate. O R D E R police order quashed and the third respondent is directed to reconsider and impose any other penalty other than the penalty of removal from service, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Further, the respondents are directed to reinstate the petitioner in service without backwages but with continuity of service.          With the abovesaid directions, the writ petition stands allowed.  However, there shall be no order as to costs.               

  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 16-09-2022 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM WP No.31012 of 2017       A.Dharmendra                    ..                                        Petitioner   vs.    ...

CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.33967 of 2016   K.Ramachandran                                                                                        Petitioner                 writ allowed     CRPF police case                                  

Uncategorized

CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.33967 of 2016   K.Ramachandran                                                                                        Petitioner                 writ allowed     CRPF police case                                  

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED  :  19.09.2022 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.33967 of 2016   K.Ramachandran                                                                                        Petitioner Vs.   1.The Union of India, Rep.by...

Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1571720811551260674?t=QRvJJlLIxFpOkfmMx2olAw&s=08 [9/19, 10:10] Sekarreporter1: Senior Advocate P Wilson requests Supreme Court to continue virtual hearings till regional benches are established

Uncategorized

Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1571720811551260674?t=QRvJJlLIxFpOkfmMx2olAw&s=08 [9/19, 10:10] Sekarreporter1: Senior Advocate P Wilson requests Supreme Court to continue virtual hearings till regional benches are established

[9/19, 10:10] Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1571720811551260674?t=QRvJJlLIxFpOkfmMx2olAw&s=08 [9/19, 10:10] Sekarreporter1: Senior Advocate P Wilson requests Supreme Court to continue virtual hearings till regional benches are established Rajya Sabha Member and senior lawyer P Wilson has long been...

Ashvath Neelakandan. V ‍chettinadu Law: On 17.09.2022 Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R. Suresh Kumar addressed the new batch of 2022-23 of Chettinad School of Law. He started his excellent address with the words, “Selecting the Legal profession is one of the clever decision that you have taken.” He commenced with the history of the courts and Law colleges in the south India of Madras Presidency. Then he elaborated his speech towards the identification of problems of a client as an art of advocacy is the essesntial requirement of an Advocate of this profession

Uncategorized

Ashvath Neelakandan. V ‍chettinadu Law: On 17.09.2022 Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R. Suresh Kumar addressed the new batch of 2022-23 of Chettinad School of Law. He started his excellent address with the words, “Selecting the Legal profession is one of the clever decision that you have taken.” He commenced with the history of the courts and Law colleges in the south India of Madras Presidency. Then he elaborated his speech towards the identification of problems of a client as an art of advocacy is the essesntial requirement of an Advocate of this profession

[9/18, 22:32] Ashvath Neelakandan. V 👨🏻‍⚖️🤵🏻‍♂chettinadu Law: On 17.09.2022 Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R. Suresh Kumar addressed the new batch of 2022-23 of Chettinad School of Law. He started his excellent address with the words,...

Thus, when all the circumstances above are taken cumulatively together, the findings of the Lower Appellate Court, that the complainant had not properly proved the loan transactions and the Trial Court has not properly appreciated about the capacity of the complainant, and the source of money, etc., cannot be held to be a perverse or an impossible view. Therefore, the Lower Appellate Court on the reading of the evidence and on exercising the jurisdiction has acquitted the accused. In these appeals against the acquittal, the said findings cannot be overturned as the finding of the guilt unless the findings are perverse or an impossible view. In that view of the matter, these appeals fail and are dismissed accordingly. 16.09.2022 judge barath sacravarthi

Uncategorized

Thus, when all the circumstances above are taken cumulatively together, the findings of the Lower Appellate Court, that the complainant had not properly proved the loan transactions and the Trial Court has not properly appreciated about the capacity of the complainant, and the source of money, etc., cannot be held to be a perverse or an impossible view. Therefore, the Lower Appellate Court on the reading of the evidence and on exercising the jurisdiction has acquitted the accused. In these appeals against the acquittal, the said findings cannot be overturned as the finding of the guilt unless the findings are perverse or an impossible view. In that view of the matter, these appeals fail and are dismissed accordingly. 16.09.2022 judge barath sacravarthi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Reserved on : 22.08.2022 Pronounced on :  16.09.2022 CORAM : THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Crl.A.Nos.5, 6, 7 of 2021 In Crl.A.No.5 of 2021: C.Balu @...