SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

Author: Sekar Reporter

Uncategorized

Madras high court news

[9/21, 06:19] Sekarreporter: ஆக்கிரமிப்பாளருடன் கூட்டுச் சேர்ந்து கோயில் சொத்துக்களை முறைகேடாக கையாளும் அதிகாரிகளுக்கு எதிராக உரிய நடவடிக்கை எடுக்க சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் வலியுறுத்தி உள்ளது. சென்னை வில்லிவாக்கம் பகுதியைச் சேர்ந்த கே.செந்தில்குமார் எம்.டி.ஹெச். சாலையில் 3 ஆயிரத்து 227 சதுர அடி பரப்பளவு கொண்ட...

Uncategorized

W.A.No.177 of 2021 PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J. and KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. (Order of the court was made by PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J.) The Writ Appeal is directed against the order dated —–) under what authority the impugned order was passed by the then Revenue Divisional Officer, when the said authority is only an appellate authority and the power only vests with the Tahsildhar, as per Section 10 of the Tamil Nadu Patta Pass Book Act, 1983. (ii) The reason for not summoning the Company for enquiry, when the first respondent-Company had sent a letter to the Revenue Divisional Officer asserting their ownership much before the impugned order effecting name change in patta was issued. (iii) when and where all the original files were placed/misplaced, since the then RDO asserted that on the date when he passed the order impugned in the writ petition, they were very much available ; and (iv) the further course of action that is proposed to be taken against the errant officials in this regard.

[9/22, 06:56] Sekarreporter: [9/22, 06:55] Sekarreporter: 1 W.A.No.177 of 2021 PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J. and KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. (Order of the court was made by PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J.) The Writ Appeal is directed against the...

Uncategorized

Sekarreporter: Page 1 of 2 NOTICE (Revised) It is hereby notified for the information of the Advocates and the parties appearing in person in the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court at Madurai that in the event of non availability of any Court, as also in the event of any Court passing an order for not placing the matter before the said Court and in the event

[9/21, 21:53] Sekarreporter: Page 1 of 2 NOTICE (Revised) It is hereby notified for the information of the Advocates and the parties appearing in person in the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court at...

Uncategorized

ஆக்கிரமிப்பாளருடன் கூட்டுச் சேர்ந்து கோயில் சொத்துக்களை முறைகேடாக கையாளும் அதிகாரிகளுக்கு எதிராக உரிய நடவடிக்கை எடுக்க சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் வலியுறுத்தி உள்ளது.

[9/21, 06:19] Sekarreporter: ஆக்கிரமிப்பாளருடன் கூட்டுச் சேர்ந்து கோயில் சொத்துக்களை முறைகேடாக கையாளும் அதிகாரிகளுக்கு எதிராக உரிய நடவடிக்கை எடுக்க சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் வலியுறுத்தி உள்ளது. சென்னை வில்லிவாக்கம் பகுதியைச் சேர்ந்த கே.செந்தில்குமார் எம்.டி.ஹெச். சாலையில் 3 ஆயிரத்து 227 சதுர அடி பரப்பளவு கொண்ட...

Uncategorized

Madras high court news

[9/21, 06:39] Sekarreporter: https://youtu.be/Jtqg8f1tExk [9/21, 07:46] Sekarreporter: https://youtu.be/0qt-h2RsBfM [9/21, 07:46] Sekarreporter: https://youtu.be/o_A0EeECMZc [9/21, 08:28] Sekarreporter: https://youtu.be/LBpgTeZWn3E [9/21, 08:28] Sekarreporter: [9/21, 08:27] Sekarreporter: https://youtu.be/l2JinmJSZwg [9/21, 08:27] Sekarreporter: மத்திய அரசு வக்கீல்கள் மாநாடு மத்திய அரசு வக்கீல் பேட்டி...

Uncategorized

Danialmary: Wonderful ,enlightening explanation into d history of NEET BY his lordship HARI PARANTHAMAN🇮🇳 v give a million 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼TN

[9/21, 09:15] Sekarreporter: https://youtu.be/lHX0QGpymkk [9/21, 11:18] Sekarreporter: [9/21, 11:14] Sekarreporter: Ok [9/21, 11:16] Danialmary: Wonderful ,enlightening explanation into d history of NEET BY his lordship HARI PARANTHAMAN🇮🇳 v give a million 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼TN has alway...

Uncategorized

The Supreme Court on Monday confirmed a Madras High Court judgment which upheld a fiscal formula included in the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules to execute refund of unutilised Input Tax Credit (ITC) accumulated on account of input services.

NATIONAL SC upholds Madras HC order on refund of unutilised input tax credit Legal Correspondent NEW DELHI, SEPTEMBER 14, 2021 04:47 IST UPDATED: SEPTEMBER 14, 2021 00:32 IST Settles controversy over Rule 89(5) of...

Uncategorized

Justice G. Ilangovan observed that Section 188 of IPC would not stand against the petitioner as the police cannot file the case and investigate the same without getting proper permission from the jurisdictional Magistrate concerned. A detailed guideline had already been issued by the court, the judge said. With regard to the offence under Section 269 of IPC, the petitioner was simply riding his two-wheeler. It was a trivial matter in which no offence of grievous nature was involved.

NEWS CITIES MADURAI MADURAI FIR against man who ventured out during lockdown quashed STAFF REPORTER MADURAI, SEPTEMBER 20, 2021 21:41 IST UPDATED: SEPTEMBER 20, 2021 21:53 IST Bringing relief to a Madurai man, booked...