Follow:
- Next story In view of the above discussion and said case law the prosecution has failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt and thereby the accused is entitled for acquittal. 22. In the result this criminal appeal is allowed and the judgment and conviction passed by the I Additional Special Court for NDPS Act Cases, Madurai in C.C. No.91 of 2019 is set aside and the accused is acquitted from the charges under Sections 8(c)r/w.20(b)(ii)(C) of NDPS Act and he be set at liberty subject to other cases if any. The bail bond, if any, executed by the appellant shall stand cancelled and fine amount, if any, paid by him is ordered to be refunded forthwith. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 29.09.2023 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No NCC : Yes/No aav To 1. The I Additional Special Court for NDPS Act Cases, Madurai 2. The Inspector of police NIB-CID Dindigul 3. The Section Officer, Criminal Records, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 4. The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai P.DHANABAL , J. aav CRl.A(MD)No.551 of 2021 29.09.2023
- Previous story sekarreporter1: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/chennai/custody-of-under-10-girls-always-mothers-says-hc/articleshow/104791419.cms [10/29, 10:42] sekarreporter1:
Recent Posts
- THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR andTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGANW.A(MD)No.479 of 2024 andC.M.P(MD)No.3875 of 20241.The State of Tamil Nadu,Represented by its Secretary,Department of School Education, Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009.2.The Joint Commissioner of School Education (Personnel),
- 04/05, 08:50] K. Chandru Former Judge Of Highcourt: அம்மி மிதித்து அருந்ததி பார்க்கும் சடங்குகள் அர்த்தமற்றவை!-கே.சந்துரு, மேனாள் நீதிபதி, சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம்
- Quashing the refusal slip provided by Rasipuram sub-registrar, the judge said, “The official’s decision to not register a sale deed presented by the petitioner since an appeal is pending as against the preliminary decree cannot be sustained in the eye of law. Despite judicial pronouncements, registrations are refused citing internal department circulars. It is not open to the registering authorities to interpret the judgement and decide whether the facts are applied to the particular case or not,” HC noted.
- Madurai Srinivas Ragavan: சுப்ரீம் கோர்ட்டுக்கு இன்று முதல் புதிய இணையதளம்- வழக்கு விசாரணையை நேரலையில் காணலாம்
- 4/05, 00:10] DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Vineeta Sharma vs Rakesh Sharma reported in AIR 2020 SC 3717 held that:
More
Recent Posts
- THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR andTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGANW.A(MD)No.479 of 2024 andC.M.P(MD)No.3875 of 20241.The State of Tamil Nadu,Represented by its Secretary,Department of School Education, Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009.2.The Joint Commissioner of School Education (Personnel),
- 04/05, 08:50] K. Chandru Former Judge Of Highcourt: அம்மி மிதித்து அருந்ததி பார்க்கும் சடங்குகள் அர்த்தமற்றவை!-கே.சந்துரு, மேனாள் நீதிபதி, சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம்
- Quashing the refusal slip provided by Rasipuram sub-registrar, the judge said, “The official’s decision to not register a sale deed presented by the petitioner since an appeal is pending as against the preliminary decree cannot be sustained in the eye of law. Despite judicial pronouncements, registrations are refused citing internal department circulars. It is not open to the registering authorities to interpret the judgement and decide whether the facts are applied to the particular case or not,” HC noted.
- Madurai Srinivas Ragavan: சுப்ரீம் கோர்ட்டுக்கு இன்று முதல் புதிய இணையதளம்- வழக்கு விசாரணையை நேரலையில் காணலாம்
- 4/05, 00:10] DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Vineeta Sharma vs Rakesh Sharma reported in AIR 2020 SC 3717 held that: