SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

Category: Uncategorized

Uncategorized

Observing that he didn’t deserve this remark, Justice Subramanian directed the registry to place the papers of tge before the Chief Justice for posting it before some other Court.

The Madras High Court Judge, Justice R. Subramanian last week recused from hearing a case after the lawyer arguing before him remarked that he (Justice Subramanian) shouldn’t hear the case like ‘Thanjavur Landlord’. Thanjavur...

Uncategorized

Madras high court news

[9/22, 11:00] Sekarreporter: தாம்பரம் வருவாய் கோட்டாட்சியர் அலுவலகத்தில் நிலம் தொடர்பான ஆவணங்கள் மாயமானது குறித்து விசாரித்து நான்கு வாரங்களில் அறிக்கை தாக்கல் செய்ய நில நிர்வாக துறை ஆணையருக்கு சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது. சென்னை, ஜமீன் பல்லாவரத்தில் குரோம் லெதர் கம்பெனிக்கு சொந்தமான 1.79...

Uncategorized

IN THE COURT OF SESSIONS AT CHENNAI Present: Thiru R. Selvakumar, B.A., M.L., Principal Sessions Judge Wednesday, the 22nd day of September, 2021 Crl.M.P.Nos.15850 and 16371/2021 in CCBI Crime No.32/2021 Sam Abisheik .. Petitioner in Crl.M.P.No.15850/2021 /Accused Tamilselvi @ Meera Mithun .. Petitioner in bail granted

IN THE COURT OF SESSIONS AT CHENNAI Present: Thiru R. Selvakumar, B.A., M.L., Principal Sessions Judge Wednesday, the 22nd day of September, 2021 Crl.M.P.Nos.15850 and 16371/2021 in CCBI Crime No.32/2021 Sam Abisheik .. Petitioner...

Uncategorized

Full order of THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.Nos.23145 to 23148 of 2018 & 2310 of 2019 and W.M.P.Nos.27045 to 27048 of 2018 Kongu Vellalar Matric Higher Secondary School, ——The first respondent/Commissioner is directed to ensure that fair rent fixation / re-fixation / enhancement of rent, as the case may be, are being done once in three years in respect of all the properties of the religious institutions across the State of Tamil Nadu by following the procedures as contemplated under Section 34-A of the Act.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 09.09.2021 CORAM THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.Nos.23145 to 23148 of 2018 & 2310 of 2019 and W.M.P.Nos.27045 to 27048 of 2018 Kongu Vellalar Matric...

Uncategorized

Mr. V. Ramasubramanium, Judge, Supreme Court of India Hon’ble Justice Mr. M.M. Sundaresh, Judge, Supreme Court of India Schedule of events commemorating the 80th Birthday of Shri. V.T. Gopalan Sunday, 26th September 2021 At 11:00 am via Microsoft TEAMS Please join using the link – https://bit.ly/vtg80bday Welcome address by Mr. P.Wilson, Member of Parliament, Rajya Sabha, Sr. Advocate, Madras High

[9/22, 07:53] Sekarreporter: Schedule of events commemorating the 80th Birthday of Shri. V.T. Gopalan Sunday, 26th September 2021 At 11:00 am via Microsoft TEAMS Please join using the link – https://bit.ly/vtg80bday Welcome address by...

Uncategorized

Chief Justice Sanjib Banerjee and Justice P.D. Audikesavalu said they could take judicial notice of drivers of vehicles fitted with crash guards and bull bars behave like “bullies” on roads, especially on the State and national highways.

WThe Madras High Court on Tuesday upheld a notification issued by the Centre in December 2017 asking all State governments and Union Territories to prohibit the use of crash guards and bull bars in...

Uncategorized

Madras high court news

[9/21, 06:19] Sekarreporter: ஆக்கிரமிப்பாளருடன் கூட்டுச் சேர்ந்து கோயில் சொத்துக்களை முறைகேடாக கையாளும் அதிகாரிகளுக்கு எதிராக உரிய நடவடிக்கை எடுக்க சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் வலியுறுத்தி உள்ளது. சென்னை வில்லிவாக்கம் பகுதியைச் சேர்ந்த கே.செந்தில்குமார் எம்.டி.ஹெச். சாலையில் 3 ஆயிரத்து 227 சதுர அடி பரப்பளவு கொண்ட...

Uncategorized

W.A.No.177 of 2021 PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J. and KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. (Order of the court was made by PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J.) The Writ Appeal is directed against the order dated —–) under what authority the impugned order was passed by the then Revenue Divisional Officer, when the said authority is only an appellate authority and the power only vests with the Tahsildhar, as per Section 10 of the Tamil Nadu Patta Pass Book Act, 1983. (ii) The reason for not summoning the Company for enquiry, when the first respondent-Company had sent a letter to the Revenue Divisional Officer asserting their ownership much before the impugned order effecting name change in patta was issued. (iii) when and where all the original files were placed/misplaced, since the then RDO asserted that on the date when he passed the order impugned in the writ petition, they were very much available ; and (iv) the further course of action that is proposed to be taken against the errant officials in this regard.

[9/22, 06:56] Sekarreporter: [9/22, 06:55] Sekarreporter: 1 W.A.No.177 of 2021 PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J. and KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. (Order of the court was made by PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA, J.) The Writ Appeal is directed against the...