You may also like...
-
The writ petition is filed challenging the clause 8(1)(e) and 8(2)(a) contained in the chapter 8 of National Eligibility Cum Entrance Test (UG) – 2020 issued by the National Testing agency as unconstitutional, unreasonable, arbitrary and as the same is in violative of the fundamental rights guaranteed under the Indian Constitution. The petitioner states that above said provision leaves the women
by Sekar Reporter · Published September 30, 2020
-
Flipkart founder Sachin Bansal has moved #MadrasHighCourt challenging Rs 10,600 Cr FEMA violation notice issued by ED [9/3, 16:37] Sekarreporter: Admitting the plea Justice R Mahadevan observed as to why the authorities failed to take action against the alleged violation for the past 12 years. Directs ED to file its response by 3 weeks
by Sekar Reporter · Published September 3, 2021
-
A Single Judge while hearing a collateral proceedings cannot override a judgment of a Division Bench between the same parties and such order will be without jurisdiction and Corum non judice. Therefore the findings and directions contrary to the Division Bench must be disregarded. The above directions were issued while hearing a contempt proceedings for non compliance of the Order made by the Division Bench in HCP for sending the minor twin boys who are US citizen to United States wherein the Court noticed that the single judge in a connected CRP proceedings held that Division Bench Order is not valid and granted the interim custody to the mother. G Rajagopalan senior counsel for Sunita Kumari for petitioner
by Sekar Reporter · Published March 3, 2023