Follow:
- Next story Wondering how such request could be entertained at the eleventh hour, the CJ asked her to submit a representation to the Registrar. The I-T proceedings had been initiated for alleged non-disclosure of sale consideration of ₹1.36 crore, reportedly received by the duo after selling their 1.16-acre property at Muttukadu in 2015.
- Previous story Justice R. Mahadevan issued the direction after finding that the government continued to engage traditional stapathis despite the GCAS having been established in 1957 to create trained hands in designing, building, repairing and resurrecting temple structures as well as idols.
Recent Posts
- At this juncture, apropos it is to point out that this Court, earlier, in more than two cases, had requested Mr. J. Radhakrishnan, I.A.S., when he was the Health Secretary, to appear online to assist the Court and he also ensured that the parties arrive at a compromise and a quietus is given to the matter. It is only with this object in mind, we have requested the aforesaid officers to appear online. Post on 25.09.2023 at 1.00 p.m. (S.V.N., J.) (K.R.S.,J.) 21.09.2023 cad
- தூத்துக்குடி போலீஸ் துப்பாக்கி சூடு | தமிழக அரசுக்கு சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றம் கேள்வி! NHRC விசாரணைப் பிரிவின் அறிக்கை மீது நீதிபதிகள் ஜே.நிஷா பானு மற்றும் என்.மாலா ஆகியோர், அரசு எடுத்த நடவடிக்கையை கண்டறியுமாறு ஏஜி ஆர்.சுண்முகசுந்தரத்திடம் கேட்டுக் கொண்டனர்.
- நீதிபதி தண்டபாணி திரைப்பட இசை கலைஞர்கள் சங்கத்துற்கு வருகிற 24ம் தேதி ஞாயிற்றுகிழமை தேரத்ல் நடத்தை இடைக்கால தடை உத்தரவு பிறப்பித்தார். வழக்கு தாக்கல.செய தவர் முன்னாள். Add pp ஜோதிகுமார்
- S.VAIDYANATHAN,J. and C.SARAVANAN,J. ar 4. In our previous order dated 25.08.2023, we had clearly held that the order has to be complied with in letter and spirit, as otherwise, they have to cast their appearance before this Court on the next date of hearing. Moreover, a Statutory Notice was also issued to the respondents as early as on 06.04.2023. Though the presence of the respondents / contemnors had been dispensed with on 01.06.2023, it does not mean that this Court has given license to disobey the order of this Court. The respondents, namely, Mrs.Swarna I.A.S., and Mrs.Mythili K.Rajendran I.A.S. have neither chosen to comply with the order of this Court nor to appear before this Court and the act of the respondents is highly deprecated, thereby making a mockery of the Court and the judicial system. Hence, we are inclined to issue a Bailable Warrant to the respondents to secure their presence. Registry is directed to issue a Bailable Warrant to Mrs.Swarna I.A.S., and Mrs.Mythili K.Rajendran I.A.S / Contemnors, returnable by 04.10.2023. Post on 04.10.2023. (S.V.N.,J.) (C.S.N.,J.) 20.09.2023 ar Note: Issue order copy AND WARRANT on 21.09.2023 Cont.P.No.563 of 2022
- Vinothpandian: 2013 (2) SCC 493 : Extra judicial executive victim families assn vs union of india : Regarding fake encounters custodial deaths , writ is maintainable even though alternative remedy before NHRC was available
More
Recent Posts
- At this juncture, apropos it is to point out that this Court, earlier, in more than two cases, had requested Mr. J. Radhakrishnan, I.A.S., when he was the Health Secretary, to appear online to assist the Court and he also ensured that the parties arrive at a compromise and a quietus is given to the matter. It is only with this object in mind, we have requested the aforesaid officers to appear online. Post on 25.09.2023 at 1.00 p.m. (S.V.N., J.) (K.R.S.,J.) 21.09.2023 cad
- தூத்துக்குடி போலீஸ் துப்பாக்கி சூடு | தமிழக அரசுக்கு சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றம் கேள்வி! NHRC விசாரணைப் பிரிவின் அறிக்கை மீது நீதிபதிகள் ஜே.நிஷா பானு மற்றும் என்.மாலா ஆகியோர், அரசு எடுத்த நடவடிக்கையை கண்டறியுமாறு ஏஜி ஆர்.சுண்முகசுந்தரத்திடம் கேட்டுக் கொண்டனர்.
- நீதிபதி தண்டபாணி திரைப்பட இசை கலைஞர்கள் சங்கத்துற்கு வருகிற 24ம் தேதி ஞாயிற்றுகிழமை தேரத்ல் நடத்தை இடைக்கால தடை உத்தரவு பிறப்பித்தார். வழக்கு தாக்கல.செய தவர் முன்னாள். Add pp ஜோதிகுமார்
- S.VAIDYANATHAN,J. and C.SARAVANAN,J. ar 4. In our previous order dated 25.08.2023, we had clearly held that the order has to be complied with in letter and spirit, as otherwise, they have to cast their appearance before this Court on the next date of hearing. Moreover, a Statutory Notice was also issued to the respondents as early as on 06.04.2023. Though the presence of the respondents / contemnors had been dispensed with on 01.06.2023, it does not mean that this Court has given license to disobey the order of this Court. The respondents, namely, Mrs.Swarna I.A.S., and Mrs.Mythili K.Rajendran I.A.S. have neither chosen to comply with the order of this Court nor to appear before this Court and the act of the respondents is highly deprecated, thereby making a mockery of the Court and the judicial system. Hence, we are inclined to issue a Bailable Warrant to the respondents to secure their presence. Registry is directed to issue a Bailable Warrant to Mrs.Swarna I.A.S., and Mrs.Mythili K.Rajendran I.A.S / Contemnors, returnable by 04.10.2023. Post on 04.10.2023. (S.V.N.,J.) (C.S.N.,J.) 20.09.2023 ar Note: Issue order copy AND WARRANT on 21.09.2023 Cont.P.No.563 of 2022
- Vinothpandian: 2013 (2) SCC 493 : Extra judicial executive victim families assn vs union of india : Regarding fake encounters custodial deaths , writ is maintainable even though alternative remedy before NHRC was available