law tips Vinothpandian: Supreme court judgement: SLP ( civil ) No 9496 of 2020 dated 4- 02 – 2022 Ajanta LLP vs casino keisanki kabushiki computer ltd : consent decree cannot be modified / altered unless the mistake is patent or obvious mistake ( order 23 rule 3 CPC 1908 )

[16/04, 11:10] Vinothpandian: Supreme court judgement: SLP ( civil ) No 9496 of 2020 dated 4- 02 – 2022 Ajanta LLP vs casino keisanki kabushiki computer ltd : consent decree cannot be modified / altered unless the mistake is patent or obvious mistake ( order 23 rule 3 CPC 1908 )
[16/04, 11:10] Vinothpandian: Supreme court : SLP no 12369 of 2021 dated 8- 12- 2021 Uttar Pradesh state road transport corporation vs Gajadhar nath : With regard to removal from service of an employee , initiation of criminal proceedings against employee or not initiating proceedings has no bearing to prove misconduct in departmental proceedings
[16/04, 11:10] Vinothpandian: 2019 (3) SCC 39 ; Joseph shine vs union.of india : A bench disagreeing with decision.of a larger or coequal bench can only refer the matter to a larger bench , it cannot disagree or dissent
[16/04, 11:10] Vinothpandian: Supreme court : criminal appeal no 207 of 2022 dated 15 – 02 – 2022 manoj @ monu @ vishal chaudhary vs state of haryana : Birth certificate issued by corporation or municipal authority or panchayat is relevant document to prove juvenility instead of school leaving record
[16/04, 11:10] Vinothpandian: Supreme court : SLP no 3008 of 2022 dated 28-02-2022 surjeet singh sahni vs state of UP : with regard to specific performance of contract , mere representation does not extend period of limitation , aggrieved person to approach court within reasonable time

You may also like...