SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

Madras high court weekly round up orders in my whatsapp

by · Published · Updated

[10/9, 14:03] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/fBv7qwl6ESc
[10/9, 14:03] Sekarreporter 1: [10/9, 13:49] Durai Arun: Justice R.Mahadevan is an one of the Eminent Scholar in Tamil literature.
Such a ferocious orator in Tamil Society.
I am one of his lordships follower and fan. We have been inculcating by your valuable speeches My lord.
[10/9, 14:02] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/fBv7qwl6ESc
[10/9, 16:47] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/nHU3GQXvp4g
[10/9, 17:19] Sekarreporter 1: [10/9, 17:12] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1579074244071522306?t=rLy2GKKzMoHMWrjlw7x_Hg&s=08
[10/9, 17:12] Sekarreporter 1: JUDGMENT SUMMARY IN S.A. No. 602 of 2020
ADVOCATE SHARADA VIVEK
(Appointed by the Legal Services Authority)

‘I love the little boy you are now and the man you will become.’ This is the love of the parents for their son in the case in hand. The loving parents were put to shock when the son forbade them at their time of utmost necessity.

With the fond hope that the son will be bounden by the values that he is brought up and in acknowledgement of the deep love, the parents wrote a Settlement Deed, settling their hard-earned property to the eldest son. The happy son well settled abroad, immediately acts upon the Settlement Deed and the same is brought into force. Gradually, worldly pleasures foretake the values implanted in him by his parents and he moves away from the elderly parents who live with the only hope i.e., the son, in mind.

The father falls sick and the mother takes care of him. The mother also falls sick and there is no one to take care of them. There is no reply from the two sons for the call for help from the parents. Holding hope, the father writes an empathetic message to the elder son which would even melt a stone. The elder son does not heed to the cries of the father disabled by sickness and age. They sold their jewels and spent the little money they had saved for all the treatment expenses and got up gaining a little strength.

The pathetic state of the parents push them to take a decision to cancel the Settlement Deed executed in favour of their elder son. The son who did not respond to the cries of the parents immediately turned up, not to see the parents but to drag them to the Court, when the document gets cancelled.

The son challenged the cancellation of the Settlement Deed as null and void but the Trial Court did not accept the case of the son. The enraged son without any empathy approaches the doors of the next Court. The First Appellate Court failed to consider the merits of the case and agreed with the son. Now it is the turn of the parents to approach the High Court for the redressal of their grievances. Though the parents had no wherewithal to file a case in the High Court, the Legal Services Authority extended the helping hand to them.

The Hon’ble High Court speaking through Hon’ble Justice P.T. Asha, who heard the arguments of M/s. Sharada Vivek for the aged parents through the Legal Services Authority, gave back the life to the parents. While upholding, the act of the parents in cancelling the Settlement Deed, Hon’ble Justice P.T. Asha, sent a universal message to all the sons and daughters out there, by citing a Thirukkural, which speaks about the way of life and how a child should make the parent feel proud about the values they inculcated in the child.

The crying e-mail of the father which did not move the son, moved the Court through which Hon’ble Justice P.T. Asha sent a strong message to the children who desert and neglect their parents. The Court invoked S. 23 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act and declared that the parents are entitled to cancel the Settlement Deed, when the children fail to maintain the parents. This Judgement of Hon’ble Justice P.T. Asha is a light house for all the deserted parents and a guiding star for the children.
[10/9, 17:19] Sekarreporter 1: [10/9, 16:42] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/nHU3GQXvp4g
[10/9, 17:07] Sekarreporter 1: JUDGMENT SUMMARY IN S.A. No. 602/2020
ADVOCATE SHARADA VIVEK
(Appointed by the Legal Services Authority)
ஆகா, இப்படி ஒரு பிள்ளையைப் பெறுவதற்கு பெற்றோர்கள் என்ன தவம் செய்திருக்க வேண்டும்என்று உலகத்தவர் மெச்சும்படி ஒரு பிள்ளை இருக்க வேண்டும் என்று , வள்ளுவரை மேற்கோள்காட்டி உயர்நீதிமன்ற நீதியரசர் பி டி ஆஷா அவர்கள் உலக குழந்தைகளுக்கு கலங்கரை விளக்கமாக ஒரு தீர்ப்பு சொல்லி இருக்கிறார்கள் .
அந்த வழக்கில் உயர்நீதிமன்ற சட்ட உதவி குழுவின் உதவி பெற்ற பெற்றோர்களுக்காக வாதாடும் வாய்ப்பு எனக்கு கிடைத்தது. இந்த வழக்கில் பெற்றோர்கள் அன்பைக் கொட்டி வளர்த்ததோடு, தன் பிள்ளை தன்னை ஆயுள்வரை பராமரிக்க வேண்டும் என்ற நிபந்தனையோடு தன் சொத்துக்களை மூத்தபிள்ளைக்கு தான செட்டில்மென்ட் எழுதி வைத்தார்கள். பயன்படுத்திவிட்டு பாராட்டு என்பதை மாற்றி”பயன்படுத்திவிட்டு பின்பு தூக்கி எறி” என்ற பரவிவரும் கலாச்சாரத்தை கையில் எடுத்துக்கொண்டு, எழுதிக்கொடுத்த சொத்துக்களை மட்டும் எடுத்துக்கொண்டு பெற்றோர்களை மகன் பராமரிக்க மறுத்துவிட்டான். நான்கு அறுவை சிகிச்சைகளுக்குப் பிறகும் நிராதரவாய் நின்றுகொண்டிருந்த பெற்றோர்களை திரும்பிப் பார்க்க மறுத்து விட்டான்.அந்தப் பிள்ளைக்கு பாடம் புகட்ட பெற்றோர்கள் தாங்கள் எழுதிக்கொடுத்த செட்டில்மெண்ட் ரத்து செய்தார்கள். அப்படி செய்ய பெற்றோர்களுக்கு உரிமை இல்லை என்று மூத்த பிள்ளை நீதிமன்றத்திற்கு சென்றார். பெற்றோர்கள் செய்தது சரியா? பெற்றோர்களுக்கு அப்படி செய்ய அதாவதுஎழுதிக் கொடுத்து விட்ட சொத்தை திரும்ப எடுத்துக்கொள்ள உரிமை உள்ளதா என்பதுதான் உயர் நீதிமன்றத்துக்கு முன்பாக இருந்த கேள்வி.
மூத்த குடிமக்கள் பராமரிப்பு சட்டத்தின்கீழ், பிள்ளைகள் பெற்றோர்களை பராமரிக்க மறுத்தாலோ அல்லது நிராகரித்தாலோ அல்லது ஒப்புக்கொண்ட உத்தரவாதத்தை மீறினால் கொடுத்த சொத்தை பெற்றோர்கள் திரும்ப எடுத்துக்கொள்ளலாம் என்று மாண்புமிகுநீதியரசர் ஆஷா அவர்கள் தீர்ப்பு சொல்லி இருக்கிறார்கள்.
இந்த தீர்ப்பு அறம் செய்ய விரும்பு என்று சொல்லிக் கொடுத்த பெற்றோர்களையே அறவழி தவறி ஏமாற்றும் பிள்ளைகளுக்கு ஒரு சாட்டையடி.
அன்பு ஆதரவு உழைப்பு சொத்து என்று எல்லாவற்றையும் இழந்து கடைசியில் பிள்ளைகளின் அன்பு கிடைக்காமல் சொல்லவும் முடியாமல் மெல்லவும் முடியாமல் ஊமையாய் அழும் பெற்றோர்களுக்கு ஒரு பெரிய நம்பிக்கை நட்சத்திரம்.
இந்திய கலாச்சாரத்தை தொலைத்துக் கொண்டிருக்கும் இளைய சமுதாயத்திற்கு ஒரு எச்சரிக்கை.
[10/9, 20:30] Sekarreporter 1: [10/9, 20:19] Chandrasekar Kumar Associate: என்ன ஆழ்ந்த தமிழ் அறிவு. என்ன அற்புதமான பேச்சு. எவ்வளவு பல்வேறு விஷயங்கள். அற்புதம் அற்புதம். நீதி அரசர் அவர்களின் பேச்சின் வீச்சு
[10/9, 20:27] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtube.com/shorts/BkAOZy-gyqM?feature=share
[10/9, 20:27] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtube.com/shorts/BkAOZy-gyqM?feature=share
[10/9, 20:27] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtube.com/shorts/R9W0xI5aeDA?feature=share
[10/9, 20:28] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtube.com/shorts/owg3URU6R_Y?feature=share
[10/10, 06:38] Sekarreporter 1: [10/10, 06:37] Sekarreporter 1: https://www.livelaw.in/news-updates/madras-high-court-madurai-bench-disposes-2000-cases-in-20-days-211191
[10/10, 06:37] Sekarreporter 1: The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court recently disposed of over 2000 cases in just 20 working days. This speedy adjudication in the cases was done by the division bench of Justice R Mahadevan and Justice J Sathya Narayana Prasad of the Madurai Bench.

The bench disposed of 2085 cases since its sitting on September 5. Of these, 938 were main cases including 776 writ petitions, 147 writ appeals and 1147 miscellaneous cases. The bench also disposed of cases that had been pending for more than six years.
[10/10, 06:38] Sekarreporter 1: [10/10, 06:35] Sekarreporter 1: https://www.dtnext.in/tamilnadu/2022/10/09/stp-in-tindivanam-park-hc-tells-commissioner-to-take-call-2
[10/10, 06:36] Sekarreporter 1: https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/madras-high-court-thanjavur-murder-message-accused-undertrials-delay-trial
[10/10, 06:36] Sekarreporter 1: PN Prakash and RMT Teeka Raman took exception to the delay by the special court under the National Investigation Agency Act (NIA Act) in examining protected witnesses in the 2019 Thanjavur murder case.

“What is highlighted to the superior courts and to the world is, accused are being kept as undertrials for years on end in our criminal justice system. None will have the patience to pore over trial court records to find out who was actually responsible for the delay,” the High Court said.
[10/10, 06:44] Sekarreporter 1: [10/10, 06:42] Sekarreporter 1: Section 119 Evidence Act | Madras High Court Lays Down Principles For Examining Witnesses Who Are Unable To Speak https://www.livelaw.in/news-updates/section119-evidence-act-madras-high-court-lays-down-principles-examining-witnesses-unable-speak-sign-orally-interpreter-videography-211188
[10/10, 06:42] Sekarreporter 1: The Madras High Court, in a judgment delivered in a criminal appeal, laid down certain significant principles relating to the examination of witnesses

https://www.livelaw.in/news-updates/section119-evidence-act-madras-high-court-lays-down-principles-examining-witnesses-unable-speak-sign-orally-interpreter-videography-211188
[10/10, 06:43] Sekarreporter 1: Judge sunder mohan
[10/10, 06:48] Sekarreporter 1: [10/10, 06:46] Sekarreporter 1: https://www.verdictum.in/court-updates/high-courts/madras-high-court-tamil-nadu-periyar-ambedkar-1442507
[10/10, 06:46] Sekarreporter 1: Bench of Justice Sathi Kumar Sukumara Kurup noted thus “As far as Tamil Nadu is concerned, there cannot be any objection from anyone for erecting the statues of Thanthai Periyar or Dr.Ambedkar. The people individually have respects for these leaders.” In this case, Petitioner-Kaladi had approached the Court seeking directions to State Authorities to consider the Petitioner’s representation in the light of the recommendation made by the Tahsildar for installing statues of Dr.BR Ambedkar and reformer Thanthai Periyar at the Petitioner’s property that is a patta land.

https://www.verdictum.in/court-updates/high-courts/madras-high-court-tamil-nadu-periyar-ambedkar-1442507
[10/10, 08:54] Sekarreporter 1: [10/10, 08:53] Sekarreporter 1: *GLIMPSE OF A LATEST VERDICT*
*Seeman & 12 Ors. Vs. State Rep. by Inspector of Police & Anr.*
Crl.O.P.No. 23044 of 2022
Dated: 23.09.2022

*Honourable Mr. Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan* allowed the Criminal Original Petition in the matter relating to *“FIR Quash – IPC S. 117, 143, 188 – Freedom of Speech/Unlawful Assembly”* and observed and held as follows:

i) The petitioners raised slogans condemning against the implementation of National Education Policy 2020 by the Union Government, without getting prior permission from the concerned authority. Therefore, the respondent police levelled the charges under Sections 143, 188 and 117 of IPC.

ii) From Section 195(1)(a) of the Criminal Procedure Code, it is clear that for taking cognizance of the offences under Section 188 of IPC, the public servant should lodge a complaint in writing and other than that no Court has power to take cognizance.

iii) Caselaws cited: *(1) Mahaboob Basha Vs. Sambanda Reddiar and others [1994(1) Crimes, Page 477]; (2) Jeevanandham and others Vs. State rep. by the Inspector of Police [2018-2-L.W. (Crl.) 606].*

iv) Respondent Police is not a competent person to register FIR for the offences under Section 188 of IPC. As such FIR is liable to be quashed. Further, the complaint does not state as to how the protest formed by the petitioners and others is an unlawful protest and does not satisfy the requirements of Section 143 of IPC. Therefore, final report is liable to be quashed.
[10/10, 08:53] Sekarreporter 1: ..
[10/10, 08:54] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/oLHfVYN-BpI
[10/10, 10:46] Sekarreporter 1: [10/10, 10:44] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/fBv7qwl6ESc
[10/10, 10:44] Sekarreporter 1: [10/10, 10:27] Chandrasekar Kumar Associate: Kindly send again the speach of Justice Mahadevan at Madurai about Purananooru
[10/10, 10:44] Sekarreporter 1: 👍
[10/10, 11:53] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtube.com/shorts/XR2nDz5HN4Q?feature=share
[10/10, 12:26] Sekarreporter 1: நீதிபதி எஸ்.எம்.சுப்பிரமணியம், சான்றிதழ்களை தாமதமாக சமர்ப்பித்தார் என்பதற்காக வேலைவாய்ப்பு வழங்க மறுக்க முடியாது https://sekarreporter.com/%e0%ae%a8%e0%af%80%e0%ae%a4%e0%ae%bf%e0%ae%aa%e0%ae%a4%e0%ae%bf-%e0%ae%8e%e0%ae%b8%e0%af%8d-%e0%ae%8e%e0%ae%ae%e0%af%8d-%e0%ae%9a%e0%af%81%e0%ae%aa%e0%af%8d%e0%ae%aa%e0%ae%bf%e0%ae%b0%e0%ae%ae-3/
[10/10, 12:26] Sekarreporter 1: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM   W.P.No.27431 of 2017 and W.M.P.No.29320 of 2017   D.Elangovan           For Petitioner     : Mr.M.Gnanasekar                                           for Mr.S.Ashok kumar                                         For Respondents : Mrs.S.Mythreye Chandru                                          Special Government Pleader          ORDER       13.Thus, this Court is of an opinion that the writ petitioner was denied an opportunity without any valid or acceptable reason and he is eligible and entitled for selection or appointment, since other candidates who scored lesser marks than that of the petitioner were selected and appointed. For all these reasons, the writ petition is to be considered. https://sekarreporter.com/the-honourable-mr-justice-s-m-subramaniam-w-p-no-27431-of-2017-and-w-m-p-no-29320-of-2017-d-elangovan-for-petitione/
[10/10, 12:37] Sekarreporter 1: [10/10, 12:35] Sekarreporter 1: The Tamil Nadu Advocate Association hereby strongly condemns the malicious campaign laid out against Hon’ble Dr. Justice Dhananjay Chandrachud. At a time when the entire Bar and Bench is eagerly awaiting the assumption of office by the Hon’ble Judge as the 50th Chief Justice of India, following the footsteps of the illustrious Chief Justice of Mr. Justice Y. V. Chandrachud. That he was elevated in the year 2000 in Bombay and later headed the Allahabad High Court as its Chief Justice and has been serving as a Judge of the Supreme Court of India since 2016 is well known to all in the legal circles. His Lordship has rendered several Landmark Judgments and is known to be a champion for existence of free and liberal society and infusion of technology for the efficient functioning of the Judiciary.
The unwanted comments by some disgruntled elements to malign the Judiciary cannot be tolerated by any member of the Legal fraternity, which ultimately undermines the faith in the Institution in the minds of the innocent general public. The allegations levelled by RK Pathan are completely erroneous and the same are merely based on assumptions, the dubious, malafide and malicious intention is clearly visible in the letter addressed by Mr.Pathan. There seems to a hidden motive and agenda behind these letters which are only addressed to derail the majesty of Indian Judiciary. This recent trend of alleging scurrilous comments and smear campaigns against the Judges of Hon’ble Supreme Court and it’s judges are increasing especially when an eminent Judge is going to take position of the Hon’ble Chief Justice of India.
This degrading trend of tarnishing the Judiciary’s image continues from the term of Hon’ble Justice Ranjan Gogoi and it happened to Hon’ble Justice N.V.Ramana and now Hon’ble Justice D.Y.Chandrachud. These type of erring people scandalizing the Judiciary must be dealt with iron hands. The bar and the bench must strive together to save the dignity and decorum of this Judicial forum and protect the Judiciary from such transgressions.
The Tamil Nadu Advocate Association hereby condemns the irresponsible, slanderous statement and warns to take legal action against all such perpetrators and disgruntled elements.
[10/10, 12:36] Sekarreporter 1: ..
[10/10, 12:40] Sekarreporter 1: [10/10, 12:40] Sekarreporter 1: [10/10, 12:35] Sekarreporter 1: The Tamil Nadu Advocate Association hereby strongly condemns the malicious campaign laid out against Hon’ble Dr. Justice Dhananjay Chandrachud. At a time when the entire Bar and Bench is eagerly awaiting the assumption of office by the Hon’ble Judge as the 50th Chief Justice of India, following the footsteps of the illustrious Chief Justice of Mr. Justice Y. V. Chandrachud. That he was elevated in the year 2000 in Bombay and later headed the Allahabad High Court as its Chief Justice and has been serving as a Judge of the Supreme Court of India since 2016 is well known to all in the legal circles. His Lordship has rendered several Landmark Judgments and is known to be a champion for existence of free and liberal society and infusion of technology for the efficient functioning of the Judiciary.
The unwanted comments by some disgruntled elements to malign the Judiciary cannot be tolerated by any member of the Legal fraternity, which ultimately undermines the faith in the Institution in the minds of the innocent general public. The allegations levelled by RK Pathan are completely erroneous and the same are merely based on assumptions, the dubious, malafide and malicious intention is clearly visible in the letter addressed by Mr.Pathan. There seems to a hidden motive and agenda behind these letters which are only addressed to derail the majesty of Indian Judiciary. This recent trend of alleging scurrilous comments and smear campaigns against the Judges of Hon’ble Supreme Court and it’s judges are increasing especially when an eminent Judge is going to take position of the Hon’ble Chief Justice of India.
This degrading trend of tarnishing the Judiciary’s image continues from the term of Hon’ble Justice Ranjan Gogoi and it happened to Hon’ble Justice N.V.Ramana and now Hon’ble Justice D.Y.Chandrachud. These type of erring people scandalizing the Judiciary must be dealt with iron hands. The bar and the bench must strive together to save the dignity and decorum of this Judicial forum and protect the Judiciary from such transgressions.
The Tamil Nadu Advocate Association hereby condemns the irresponsible, slanderous statement and warns to take legal action against all such perpetrators and disgruntled elements.
[10/10, 12:36] Sekarreporter 1: ..
[10/10, 12:40] Sekarreporter 1: 👍
[10/10, 12:55] Sekarreporter 1: [10/10, 12:54] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1579372127333257221?t=WnU69SFMj2YXRKkLZSyX_Q&s=08
[10/10, 12:55] Sekarreporter 1: The Tamil Nadu Advocate Association hereby strongly condemns the malicious campaign laid out against Hon’ble Dr. Justice Dhananjay Chandrachud. At a time when the entire Bar and Bench is eagerly awaiting the assumption of office by the Hon’ble Judge as the 50th Chief Justice of India, following the footsteps of the illustrious Chief Justice of Mr. Justice Y. V. Chandrachud. https://sekarreporter.com/the-tamil-nadu-advocate-association-hereby-strongly-condemns-the-malicious-campaign-laid-out-against-honble-dr-justice-dhananjay-chandrachud-at-a-time-when-the-entire-bar-and-bench-is-eagerly-awai/
[10/10, 13:01] Sekarreporter 1: Sc collegium urgent letter In the circumstances, no further steps need be taken and the unfinished work in the meeting called for September 30, 2022 is closed without there being any further deliberation.  The meeting dated September 30, 2022 stands discharged. ……………………………….CJI. (Uday Umesh Lalit)  ………………………………….J. (Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud) ………………………………….J. (Sanjay Kishan Kaul) .………………………………….J. (S. Abdul Nazeer) .………………………………….J. (K.M. Joseph) New Delhi; October 9, 2022. RESOLUTION  For filling up vacancies of Judges in the Supreme Court, informal deliberations had been going on for some time and a formal meeting took place on September 26, 2022 when the names of eleven Judges were considered.  As there was unanimity of opinion on the name of Mr. Justice Dipankar Dutta, Chief Justice, High Court of Bombay, a Resolution to that effect was passed and the consideration of the names of other ten Judges was deferred till September 30, 2022. https://sekarreporter.com/in-the-circumstances-no-further-steps-need-be-taken-and-the-unfinished-work-in-the-meeting-called-for-september-30-2022-is-closed-without-there-being-any-further-deliberation-the-meeting-date/
[10/10, 13:02] Sekarreporter 1: [10/10, 12:47] Adv Riyaz: Section 119 of Indian Evidence Act:- Dumb witnesses

How to examine such witnesses; Mandatory requirements; Guidelines and principles laid down by His Lordship Hon’ble Mr Justice Sunder Mohan in Ravichandran Vs State Crl.A.No.65 of 2020 dated 22.09.22

•Meaning of “unable to communicate verbally” in proviso to section 119 of IEA

•Effect of non following the mandate of section 119 IEA

•Principles @ para 16 of the judgment
[10/10, 12:50] Sekarreporter 1: 👍
[10/10, 13:02] Sekarreporter 1: Sc collegium urgent letter In the circumstances, no further steps need be taken and the unfinished work in the meeting called for September 30, 2022 is closed without there being any further deliberation.  The meeting dated September 30, 2022 stands discharged. ……………………………….CJI. (Uday Umesh Lalit)  ………………………………….J. (Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud) ………………………………….J. (Sanjay Kishan Kaul) .………………………………….J. (S. Abdul Nazeer) .………………………………….J. (K.M. Joseph) New Delhi; October 9, 2022. RESOLUTION  For filling up vacancies of Judges in the Supreme Court, informal deliberations had been going on for some time and a formal meeting took place on September 26, 2022 when the names of eleven Judges were considered.  As there was unanimity of opinion on the name of Mr. Justice Dipankar Dutta, Chief Justice, High Court of Bombay, a Resolution to that effect was passed and the consideration of the names of other ten Judges was deferred till September 30, 2022. https://sekarreporter.com/in-the-circumstances-no-further-steps-need-be-taken-and-the-unfinished-work-in-the-meeting-called-for-september-30-2022-is-closed-without-there-being-any-further-deliberation-the-meeting-date/
[10/10, 13:16] Sekarreporter 1: In the result, this Court does not find any ground to interfere with the Award passed by the Arbitrator and as confirmed by the District Court under Section 34 of the Act and accordingly, this Appeal stands dismissed. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, there will be no order as to costs.                                                                          [J.N.B., J.]      [N.A.V., J.]                                                                                                10.10.2022. THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J. NISHA BANU and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH C.M.A.(MD)No.834 of 2011 https://sekarreporter.com/in-the-result-this-court-does-not-find-any-ground-to-interfere-with-the-award-passed-by-the-arbitrator-and-as-confirmed-by-the-district-court-under-section-34-of-the-act-and-accordingly-this-appeal/
[10/10, 13:18] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/zwuD9pJr4wY
[10/10, 15:53] Sekarreporter 1: [10/10, 15:52] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/SA1qMCmA6zg
[10/10, 15:52] Sekarreporter 1: Now
[10/10, 18:59] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/b5O3deet3rs
[10/10, 19:00] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/b5O3deet3rs
[10/10, 20:10] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/bbfQqN9bnyE
[10/10, 20:11] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/ksNpITAdBmU
[10/11, 06:25] Sekarreporter 1: பொறுப்பு தலைமை நீதிபதி ராஜா மற்றும் நீதிபதி கிருஷ்ணகுமார் அமர்வு, மனுவுக்கு நான்கு வாரங்களில் பதிலளிக்கும்படி தமிழக அரசுக்கு உத்தரவிட்டு, விசார்ணையை தள்ளிவைத்தது. https://sekarreporter.com/%e0%ae%aa%e0%af%8a%e0%ae%b1%e0%af%81%e0%ae%aa%e0%af%8d%e0%ae%aa%e0%af%81-%e0%ae%a4%e0%ae%b2%e0%af%88%e0%ae%ae%e0%af%88-%e0%ae%a8%e0%af%80%e0%ae%a4%e0%ae%bf%e0%ae%aa%e0%ae%a4%e0%ae%bf-%e0%ae%b0/
[10/11, 06:27] Sekarreporter 1: பொறுப்பு தலைமை நீதிபதி ராஜா மற்றும் கிருஷ்ணகுமார் அமர்வில் விசாரணைக்கு வந்தபோது, தமிழகத்தில் சட்டம் ஒழுங்கு சீராக உள்ளதாகவும், பயங்கரவாத தாக்குதல்கள் ஏதும் இல்லை என்றும் மனுவில் கூறியுள்ள நிலையில், பயங்கரவாத தடுப்புப்படை அமைக்க கோரி வழக்கு தொடர்ந்தது ஏன் என மனுதாரருக்கு நீதிபதிகள் கேள்வி https://sekarreporter.com/%e0%ae%aa%e0%af%8a%e0%ae%b1%e0%af%81%e0%ae%aa%e0%af%8d%e0%ae%aa%e0%af%81-%e0%ae%a4%e0%ae%b2%e0%af%88%e0%ae%ae%e0%af%88-%e0%ae%a8%e0%af%80%e0%ae%a4%e0%ae%bf%e0%ae%aa%e0%ae%a4%e0%ae%bf-%e0%ae%b0-2/
[10/11, 06:33] Sekarreporter 1: [10/11, 06:30] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1579637908117811200?t=m0aM7ZKLMw1mjavdD961Tw&s=08
[10/11, 06:30] Sekarreporter 1: [10/11, 06:28] Sekarreporter 1: *GLIMPSE OF A LATEST VERDICT*
*V.S.B. Educational Trust Vs. University Grants Commission & 2 Ors.*
W.P. No.24797 of 2022
Dated: 29.09.2022

*Honourable Mr. Justice R. Suresh Kumar* disposed of the Writ Petition in the matter relating to *“College – Autonomous Status – UGC”* and observed and held as follows:

i) With regards to power with the UGC to independently consider the application submitted by management/colleges for autonomous status, the issue has already been decided in *Annapoorana Engineering College Vs. Anna University and another [W.P.No.7377 of 2021] (MHC)*, wherein it was held that:
a. W.A.No.51 of 2020 has thrown a light, where, the legal position has been explicitly stated as to the status of the UGC for considering the application submitted by the institution concerned independently for the purpose of declaring it as an autonomous institution and it had attained finality by the orders of the Supreme Court.
b. This being the position, there can be no impediment for UGC to independently consider the application.
c. Where, the application initially has to be routed through the affiliating University, then the University can either forward the same to the UGC with its recommendation or the University can reject the same with reasons
d. Even if it is rejected, according to Regulation 7(3) [University Grants Commission (Conferment of Autonomous Status Upon Colleges and Measures for Maintenance of Standards in Autonomous Colleges) Regulations, 2018 (in short ‘2018 Regulations’)] it has to be forwarded only to the UGC for further action at the end of the UGC to take decision on its own merits.

ii) Therefore, whether the report of the University would reach within 30 days or not, it is for the UGC to decide the application and independently pass orders on merits within a reasonable period.

iii) Therefore, The UGC, after completion of inspection and taking into account the report of the University, is directed to complete the process of application for autonomous status within 4 weeks.
[10/11, 06:28] Sekarreporter 1: 👍
[10/11, 06:33] Sekarreporter 1: பொறுப்பு தலைமை நீதிபதி ராஜா மற்றும் நீதிபதி கிருஷ்ணகுமார் அமர்வு, மனுவுக்கு நான்கு வாரங்களில் பதிலளிக்கும்படி தமிழக அரசுக்கு உத்தரவிட்டு, விசார்ணையை தள்ளிவைத்தது. https://sekarreporter.com/%e0%ae%aa%e0%af%8a%e0%ae%b1%e0%af%81%e0%ae%aa%e0%af%8d%e0%ae%aa%e0%af%81-%e0%ae%a4%e0%ae%b2%e0%af%88%e0%ae%ae%e0%af%88-%e0%ae%a8%e0%af%80%e0%ae%a4%e0%ae%bf%e0%ae%aa%e0%ae%a4%e0%ae%bf-%e0%ae%b0/
[10/11, 06:33] Sekarreporter 1: பொறுப்பு தலைமை நீதிபதி ராஜா மற்றும் கிருஷ்ணகுமார் அமர்வில் விசாரணைக்கு வந்தபோது, தமிழகத்தில் சட்டம் ஒழுங்கு சீராக உள்ளதாகவும், பயங்கரவாத தாக்குதல்கள் ஏதும் இல்லை என்றும் மனுவில் கூறியுள்ள நிலையில், பயங்கரவாத தடுப்புப்படை அமைக்க கோரி வழக்கு தொடர்ந்தது ஏன் என மனுதாரருக்கு நீதிபதிகள் கேள்வி https://sekarreporter.com/%e0%ae%aa%e0%af%8a%e0%ae%b1%e0%af%81%e0%ae%aa%e0%af%8d%e0%ae%aa%e0%af%81-%e0%ae%a4%e0%ae%b2%e0%af%88%e0%ae%ae%e0%af%88-%e0%ae%a8%e0%af%80%e0%ae%a4%e0%ae%bf%e0%ae%aa%e0%ae%a4%e0%ae%bf-%e0%ae%b0-2/
[10/11, 06:42] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1579641073286418433?t=Kw7AaF4AS91o4x7VemFiVQ&s=08
[10/11, 06:43] Sekarreporter 1: Bar council donate rs 10 lakhs book to madras advocate association https://sekarreporter.com/bar-council-donate-rs-10-lakhs-book-to-madras-advocate-association/
[10/11, 06:43] Sekarreporter 1: [10/11, 06:42] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1579641073286418433?t=Kw7AaF4AS91o4x7VemFiVQ&s=08
[10/11, 06:43] Sekarreporter 1: Bar council donate rs 10 lakhs book to madras advocate association https://sekarreporter.com/bar-council-donate-rs-10-lakhs-book-to-madras-advocate-association/ function full videos click and see
[10/11, 06:43] Sekarreporter 1: Bar council donate rs 10 lakhs book to madras advocate association https://sekarreporter.com/bar-council-donate-rs-10-lakhs-book-to-madras-advocate-association/
[10/11, 06:43] Sekarreporter 1: [10/11, 06:42] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1579641073286418433?t=Kw7AaF4AS91o4x7VemFiVQ&s=08
[10/11, 06:43] Sekarreporter 1: Bar council donate rs 10 lakhs book to madras advocate association https://sekarreporter.com/bar-council-donate-rs-10-lakhs-book-to-madras-advocate-association/ function full videos click and see
[10/11, 06:56] Sekarreporter 1: [10/11, 06:56] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1579644305417064448?t=H0vHH56pzhXvIawMKSnCug&s=08
[10/11, 06:56] Sekarreporter 1: NGR prasath Legal gaint 86th birthday celebaration full videis click bleow link and see https://sekarreporter.com/nge-prasan-llegan-gaint-86th-birthday-celebaration-full-videis-click-bleow-link-and-see/
[10/11, 10:36] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/8eJuAm_kwjE
[10/11, 11:19] Sekarreporter 1: [10/11, 11:18] Sekarreporter 1: BREAKING| CJI UU Lalit Recommends Justice DY Chandrachud As The Next Chief Justice Of India

 

 

 

https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/cji-uu-lalit-names-justice-dy-chandrachud-as-the-next-chief-justice-of-india-211330
[10/11, 11:18] Sekarreporter 1: 👍
[10/11, 11:54] Sekarreporter 1: [10/11, 11:51] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1579718578303295494?t=lnBce_84CoB07Hch0GTWMA&s=08
[10/11, 11:51] Sekarreporter 1: It is made clear that in subsequent tenders, it is TASMAC that must obtain NOC from the property owners. As regards the procedure to be followed for obtaining of lease agreement by the applicants, a hassle-free, transparent and smooth procedure must be put in place by TASMAC and implemented in the tenders to follow. All the Writ Petitions are allowed in the above terms. CORAM THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH W.P.Nos.21391, 21970, 22601, 22606, 22609, 22611, 22614, 21701, 21706, WP.Nos. For Petitioners For Respondents WP.Nos.21391, 21398, 21401, 21392, 21395, 21447, 21455, 21456, 21450, 21453, 21649 & 22729 of 2022 Mr.AR.L.Sundaresan, Senior Counsel for Ms.AL.Gandhimathi Mr.R.Shunmugasundaram, Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr.K.Sathish Kumar and Mr.P.ArumugaRajan, Standing Counsels for TASMAC Mr.Silambannan,           Additional Advocate General assisted by Mrs.C.Sangamithirai, Special Government Pleader for the Government WP.Nos.21624, 21625 & 23489 of 2022 Mr.R.Singaravelan, Senior Counsel for Ms.V.Ambika Mr.R.Singaravelan, Senior Counsel chithra sambath m s krishnan / km vijayan Mr.M.Manimaran. . https://sekarreporter.com/it-is-made-clear-that-in-subsequent-tenders-it-is-tasmac-that-must-obtain-noc-from-the-property-owners-as-regards-the-procedure-to-be-followed-for-obtaining-of-lease-agreement-by-the-applicants-a-h/
[10/11, 12:52] Sekarreporter 1: அதிமுக இடைக்காலப் பொதுச் செயலாளராக எடப்பாடி பழனிசாமி தேர்ந்தெடுக்கப்பட்ட பொதுக்குழு தீர்மானங்களை அங்கீகரிக்க கூடாது என உத்தரவிடக் கோரி தொடரப்பட்ட வழக்கை சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றம் இரண்டு வாரம் ஒத்திவைத்துள்ளது. Admk senior vijayanarayanan assist by advts inbadurai and manoj kumar https://sekarreporter.com/%e0%ae%85%e0%ae%a4%e0%ae%bf%e0%ae%ae%e0%af%81%e0%ae%95-%e0%ae%87%e0%ae%9f%e0%af%88%e0%ae%95%e0%af%8d%e0%ae%95%e0%ae%be%e0%ae%b2%e0%ae%aa%e0%af%8d-%e0%ae%aa%e0%af%8a%e0%ae%a4%e0%af%81%e0%ae%9a%e0%af%8d/
[10/11, 17:46] Sekarreporter 1: [10/11, 17:45] Sekarreporter 1: Appearing before a Division Bench of Justices N Sathish Kumar and D Bharatha Chakravarthy,

AAG J Ravindran: Your Lordships are a double barrel gun

Justice Sathish Kumar: Yes, but don’t force us to become a machine gun. It all depends upon how you implement court orders.
[10/11, 17:45] Sekarreporter 1: .
[10/11, 18:54] Sekarreporter 1: Honorable Justice Dr Jayachandran. NDPS Act- NIBCID Police Registered Fir against the petitioner for trafficking Ganja- Madras High Court quashed the FIR -However, record that the case against the petitioner registered in Crime No.79 of 2017 is a clear case of abuse of power and malicious prosecution launched by the Investigating Officer with the help her subordinates namely, Mr.Babu and Mr.Senthil Kumar- This attitude of the Investigating Officer who has registered the case, clearly indicates that the case is not registered based on true facts. It is for the Senior Official to look into this case and take appropriate action for registering the complaint and not proceeding further in accordance with law. In the result, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed and the First Information Report in Crime No.79 of 2017 on the file of the respondent Police, (NIB-CID) Chennai is quashed. https://sekarreporter.com/honorable-justice-dr-jayachandran-ndps-act-nibcid-police-registered-fir-against-the-petitioner-for-trafficking-ganja-madras-high-court-quashed-the-fir-however-record-that-the-case-against-the-pe/
[10/11, 19:28] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/aIvpZHZCiVY
[10/11, 20:27] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/46czXnwN8rw
[10/12, 06:26] Sekarreporter 1: Madras high court october 11th order https://sekarreporter.com/madras-high-court-october-11th-order/
[10/12, 06:26] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/V79Z3YXRj_A
[10/12, 07:21] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/duOVAwj66ZI
[10/12, 07:59] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/hSp-0PsaF6o
[10/12, 07:59] Sekarreporter 1: [10/12, 07:57] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/hSp-0PsaF6o
[10/12, 07:58] Sekarreporter 1: Centre Splits Up Collegium Resolution, Withholds Approval For Justice Muralidhar’s Transfer As Madras HC Chief Justice

 

 

https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/centre-splits-up-collegium-resolution-withholds-approval-for-justice-muralidhars-transfer-as-madras-hc-chief-justice-211394
[10/12, 10:24] Sekarreporter 1: [10/12, 10:23] Sekarreporter 1: *GLIMPSE OF A LATEST VERDICT*

*Murali Vs. The Inspector of Police*
Crl.O.P. No. 4980 of 2019
Dated: 26.09.2022

*Honourable Mr. Justice G. Jayachandran* allowed of the Criminal Original Petition in the matter relating to *“Quash – FIR – NDPS”* and observed and held as follows:

i) Since the maximum punishment for the offence of possession of 650g of Ganja is upto 1 year, and over 1 year had already lapsed after registering of complaint; the complaint suffers from limitation as prescribed under Section 468 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

ii) The lapse of 5 years to test the seized contraband, and non-numbering of the final report despite direction of the Court, indicated that the case was not registered on true fact. It is for the Senior Official to look into the case and take appropriate action for registering complaint and not proceeding further in accordance with Law.

iii) Since it is a clear case of abuse of power and malicious prosecution, the petition is allowed and the FIR is quashed.
[10/12, 10:23] Sekarreporter 1: .👍
[10/12, 10:48] Sekarreporter 1: [10/12, 10:47] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1580064664079454208?t=NobfMq8H22C3NiDUGfWmwQ&s=08
[10/12, 10:47] Sekarreporter 1: GLIMPSE OF A LATEST VERDICT* *Murali Vs. The Inspector of Police* Crl.O.P. No. 4980 of 2019 Dated: 26.09.2022 *Honourable Mr. Justice G. Jayachandran* allowed the Criminal Original Petition in the matter relating to *“Quash – FIR – NDPS”* and observed and held as follows: i) Since the maximum punishment for the offence of possession of 650g of Ganja is upto 1 year, and over 1 year had already lapsed after registering of complaint; the complaint suffers from limitation as prescribed under Section 468 of the Criminal Procedure Code. https://sekarreporter.com/glimpse-of-a-latest-verdict-murali-vs-the-inspector-of-police-crl-o-p-no-4980-of-2019-dated-26-09-2022-honourable-mr-justice-g-jayachandran-allowed-the-criminal-original-petition-in-the-m/
[10/12, 12:53] Sekarreporter 1: Cont.P.No.2111 of 2022 and Sub.Appl.No.522 of 2022 in WP.No.25213 of 2022 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. This contempt petition has been filed to punish the respondents for the wilful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in WP.No.25213 of 2022 dated 22.09.2022, thereby this Court directed the respondents to grant permission to conduct procession and to conduct public meetings on 02.10.2022 at various places of Tamilnadu subject to the conditions on or before 28.09.2022. S.Prabakaran, the learned Senior Counsel appearing However, it is for the State to maintain law and order problem.  It is made clear that the respondents shall permit the petitioners on their earlier representations to conduct procession and to conduct public meetings on 06.11.2022. Registry is directed to list the matter along with all the connected contempt petitions numbered subsequently on 31.10.2022. 30.09.2022 . https://sekarreporter.com/cont-p-no-2111-of-2022-and-sub-appl-no-522-of-2022-in-wp-no-25213-of-2022-g-k-ilanthiraiyan-j-this-contempt-petition-has-been-filed-to-punish-the-respondents-for-the-wilful-disobedience-of-the-ord/
[10/12, 14:17] Sekarreporter 1: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE PARESH UPADHYAY and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY O.S.A.Nos. 254 & 255 of 2022 O.S.A.No.254 of 2022 Azizul Karim          ..Appellant. For Appellant(s) : Mr.R.Natarajan For Respondents : Mr.M.Nandhakumar COMMON JUDGMENT https://sekarreporter.com/the-honourable-mr-justice-paresh-upadhyay-and-the-honourable-mr-justice-d-bharatha-chakravarthy-o-s-a-nos-254-255-of-2022-o-s-a-no-254-of-2022-azizul-karim/
[10/12, 16:10] Sekarreporter 1: [10/12, 15:00] Sekarreporter 1: He has taken suomoto cognizance and summoned the registrar judicial and ascertained the facts and treated our request and dictated a detailed order
[10/12, 15:00] Sekarreporter 1: Mentioned the suicide held with in high court campus before justice s.m. Subramaniam to day ( now) and requested him to take suo moto cognizance.
[10/12, 15:02] Sekarreporter 1: Justice smsj takes suo Moto cognisance of the issue that happened yesterday inside the high court where a man burnt himself for non issueance of community certificate
[10/12, 15:02] Sekarreporter 1: Registry directed to register the suo moto writ petition and directed to place before hon’ble acting chief justice.
[10/12, 16:20] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/cwqAxo-mDEY
[10/12, 16:24] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/9GZsUg2B47k
[10/12, 18:44] Sekarreporter 1: The paper publication regarding the above incident published in English and Tamil Dailies namely ‘The Hindu’ and ‘Dinathanthi’ are enclosed herewith. Further the paper publication reveals that the Judicial Magistrate, Saidapet recorded the statement from the said Mr.Velmurugan in the Government Hospital. In view of the facts and circumstances, the Registrar-General, High Court of Madras is directed to number the writ petition and place it before The Hon’ble The Acting Chief Justice for listing the matter.                                                             (Justice S.M.SUBRAMANIAM) https://sekarreporter.com/the-paper-publication-regarding-the-above-incident-published-in-english-and-tamil-dailies-namely-the-hindu-and-dinathanthi-are-enclosed-herewith-further-the-paper-publication-reveals-that-the/
[10/12, 19:05] Sekarreporter 1: CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.21974 of 2017 and. For Petitioner               : Mr.G.Rajagopalan                                                     Senior Counsel                                                     For M/s.Bader Sayeed                 For R1 to R3           : Mrs.S.Mythreyechandru                                                     Special Government Pleader                                                                   For R4                              : No appearance ORDER. In view of the facts and circumstances, it is established that the appointment of the writ petitioner is not in accordance with the rules applicable in the State of Tamil Nadu for appointment to the post of P.G. Assistant. Thus, the petitioner is not entitled for the relief as this Court do not find any infirmity in respect of the order passed by the respondents.           Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. https://sekarreporter.com/coram-the-honourable-mr-justice-s-m-subramaniam-w-p-no-21974-of-2017-and-for-petitioner-mr-g-rajagopalan/
[10/12, 19:10] Sekarreporter 1: [10/12, 19:09] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/QBB7Fgbyf-s
[10/12, 19:09] Sekarreporter 1: asg sankaranarayanan நான் மிலிட்ரியில் தேர்வாகவில்லை
[10/12, 20:33] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/i_eInTJKgVk
[10/12, 20:39] Sekarreporter 1: [10/12, 20:37] Sekarreporter 1: Law Trend – A Legal News Network

No Person Shall Be Prosecuted U/Sec 66A IT Act, Directs Supreme Court in to Enforce Shreya Singhal Judgment

Click to Read Complete News
https://lawtrend.in/no-person-shall-be-prosecuted-u-sec-66a-it-act-directs-supreme-court-in-to-enforce-shreya-singhal-judgment/

Download Law Trend App For Latest Legal Updates and More Features
https://lawtrend.page.link/app
[10/12, 20:37] Sekarreporter 1: .
[10/13, 06:30] Sekarreporter 1: Madras high court orders october 13 velumani case kallakuruchi smsj order https://sekarreporter.com/madras-high-court-orders-october-13-velumani-case-kallakuruchi-smsj-order/
[10/13, 06:42] Sekarreporter 1: [10/13, 06:41] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1580365303409958912?t=pCA7AVvqpZuuQH0L6SSJKg&s=08
[10/13, 06:41] Sekarreporter 1: , THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR W.P. No.26506 of 2022 and W.M.P.Nos.25572 & 25574 of 2022 this Court has no hesitation to hold that the petitioner would be entitled to get a special reservation for third gender viz., transgender category for admission in the said course for which the prospectus in question has been issued by the. For Petitioner          : Mrs.Reshmi Christy                                  For Respondents       : Mr.U.M.Ravichandran   Special Govt. Pleader [R1 & R2] : Ms.M.Sneha   Standing Counsel [R3] O R D E R https://sekarreporter.com/the-honourable-mr-justice-r-suresh-kumar-w-p-no-26506-of-2022-and-w-m-p-nos-25572-25574-of-2022-this-court-has-no-hesitation-to-hold-that-the-petitioner-would-be-entitled-to-get-a-speci/
[10/13, 11:05] Sekarreporter 1: [10/13, 11:04] Sekarreporter 1: Hijab Row | Supreme Court Gives Split Verdict- Matter to be Referred to Three Judges Bench
[10/13, 11:04] Sekarreporter 1: The Supreme Court has given a split verdict on the hijab ban by the Karnataka Government in petitions challenging the March 15 Karnataka High Court, whereby the Karnataka HC dismissed a batch of petitions filed by Muslim girls studying in Udupi pre-university colleges seeking the right to wear hijab in classrooms.
[10/13, 11:08] Sekarreporter 1: [10/13, 11:07] Sekarreporter 1: HC judge தண்டபானி contemplates constitution of committee to monitor restoration of Thiru Vi Ka Park in Shenoy Nagar
The Hindu Bureau
Court says, retired judge K.P. Sivasubramaniam could lead the committee comprising CMRL and Horticulture department officials
[10/13, 11:07] Sekarreporter 1: .
[10/13, 11:40] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/OtbO-7hjSRk
[10/13, 12:24] Sekarreporter 1: WP.No.17008 of 2022 M.DHANDAPANI, J. [10/13, 11:07] Sekarreporter 1: HC judge தண்டபானி contemplates constitution of committee to monitor restoration of Thiru Vi Ka Park in Shenoy Nagar The Hindu Bureau Court says, retired judge K.P. Sivasubramaniam could lead the committee comprising CMRL and Horticulture department officials [10/13, 11:07] Sekarreporter 1: . https://sekarreporter.com/wp-no-17008-of-2022-m-dhandapani-j-10-13-1107-sekarreporter-1-hc-judge-%e0%ae%a4%e0%ae%a3%e0%af%8d%e0%ae%9f%e0%ae%aa%e0%ae%be%e0%ae%a9%e0%ae%bf-contemplates-constitution-of-committee-to-monit/
[10/13, 13:17] Sekarreporter 1: WP.Nos.19939 of 2014 & 36827 of 2016   S.M.SUBRAMANIAM,J.,             The constitutional importance involved in these batch of writ petitions are regarding the large scale allegations in the matter of appointment of Assistant Professors in aided Colleges viz., Pachaiyappas Trust Board https://sekarreporter.com/wp-nos-19939-of-2014-36827-of-2016-s-m-subramaniamj-the-constitutional-importance-involved-in-these-batch-of-writ-petition/
[10/13, 13:31] Sekarreporter 1: THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Appeal Suit No.175 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013. For Appellants          : Mr.V.Raghavachari                                  For Respondents       : Mr.N.Subbarayalu JUDGMENT The Result: 28.The Appeal Suit in A.S.No.175 of 2013 is allowed; The Judgement and Decree dated 01.03.2013, in O.S.No.14807 of 2010, on the file of the XIX-Additional City Civil Court, Chennai, is set aside; The O.S.No.14807 of 2010, on the file of the XIX-Additional City Civil Court, Chennai, stands decreed as prayed for; The appellants/ plaintiffs are entitled for the costs; Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 12.10.2022 https://sekarreporter.com/the-honble-mr-justice-d-bharatha-chakravarthy-appeal-suit-no-175-of-2013-and-m-p-no-1-of-2013-for-appellants-mr-v-raghavachari/
[10/13, 15:16] Sekarreporter 1: SUO MOTU  WRIT PETITION(MD)No.23708 of 2022  R.MAHADEVAN   , J. and J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, J. ORDER (Order of the Court was made by R.MAHADEVAN, J.) While this Bench was hearing HCP(MD)No.1515 of 2022. to regulate the Youtube Channels that are publishing unethical practices, such as, tutorial videos to install a pirated application, to install banned games, etc; and to direct the Central Government to take steps for effective implementation of banning of games and to create awareness programmes in all the schools and colleges regarding the impact of playing such violent online games. , https://sekarreporter.com/suo-motu-writ-petitionmdno-23708-of-2022-r-mahadevan-j-and-j-sathya-narayana-prasad-j-order-order-of-the-court-was-made-by-r-mahadevan-j-while-this-bench-was-hea/
[10/13, 16:22] Sekarreporter 1: Madurai bench order notice to gov in temple website case https://sekarreporter.com/madurai-bench-order-notice-to-gov-in-temple-website-case/
[10/13, 17:00] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/4FTWvQJBJYg
[10/13, 20:14] Sekarreporter 1: Hijab case full spilit order SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE/ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7095 OF 2022 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (CIVIL) NO. 5236 OF 2022) AISHAT SHIFA       …..APPELLANT(S) https://sekarreporter.com/supreme-court-of-india-civil-appellate-original-jurisdiction-civil-appeal-no-7095-of-2022-arising-out-of-slp-civil-no-5236-of-2022-aishat-shifa-appellant/
[10/14, 06:41] Sekarreporter 1: THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH W.P.No.25931 of 2022 and WMP Nos.25014 and 25015 of 2022 A.Irudayaraju … Petitioner Vs The State Tax Officer, https://sekarreporter.com/the-honourable-dr-justice-anita-sumanth-w-p-no-25931-of-2022-and-wmp-nos-25014-and-25015-of-2022-a-irudayaraju-petitioner-vs-the-state-tax-officer/
[10/14, 06:41] Sekarreporter 1: [10/13, 17:21] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/4FTWvQJBJYg
[10/14, 06:40] Sekarreporter 1: ILLEGAL/BIGUS WEBSITES IN NAME OF TEMPLES- WRIT PETITION BEFORE MADURAI BENCH MADRAS HIGH COURT Writ Petition came up for admission before the Hon’ble Division Bench Mr.Justice R.Mahadevan and Mr.Justice J.Sathya Narayana Prasad. https://sekarreporter.com/illegal-bigus-websites-in-name-of-temples-writ-petition-before-madurai-bench-madras-high-court-writ-petition-came-up-for-admission-before-the-honble-division-bench-mr-justice-r-mahadevan-a/
[10/14, 06:46] Sekarreporter 1: Madras high court october 13 orders https://sekarreporter.com/madras-high-court-october-13-orders/
[10/14, 07:56] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/ThBrHK1Idu0
[10/14, 07:56] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/__584u5akjk
[10/14, 10:45] Sekarreporter 1: [10/14, 10:45] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/1ZZKPlGnaTo
[10/14, 10:45] Sekarreporter 1: mhaa election old by law படி நடத்தலாம் தலைவர் mohana krishnan பேட்டி
[10/14, 10:46] Sekarreporter 1: [10/14, 10:45] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/1ZZKPlGnaTo
[10/14, 10:45] Sekarreporter 1: mhaa election old by law படி நடத்தலாம் தலைவர் mohana krishnan பேட்டி
[10/14, 13:37] Sekarreporter 1: [10/14, 13:35] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtube.com/shorts/IWf4F5SYdtA?feature=share
[10/14, 13:35] Sekarreporter 1: shorts#Mam ராமசாமி வாரிசு வழக்கு சிவில் கோர்ட் போக உத்தரவு judge nskj aag arun
[10/14, 13:37] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/oT7GmzTZKF4
[10/14, 15:02] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtube.com/shorts/rtRtkIUHF4Y?feature=share
[10/14, 15:05] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/uNkmUHP_gyk
[10/14, 15:19] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/wiMN-ZjgrgA
[10/14, 16:11] Sekarreporter 1: [10/14, 16:06] Sekarreporter 1: Mhaa election case full order THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ Review Application No. 167 of 2021 and WMP.No.27334 of 2021 and WMP.No.27830 of 2021 in Rev.AplW.SR.No.109735 of 2021 WMP.No.28296 of 2021 in Rev.AplW.SR.No.112310 of 2021 WMP.No.29088 of 2021 in Rev.AplW.SR.No.114156 of 2021 WMP.No.29947 of 2021 in Rev.AplW.SR.No.114756 of 2021 WMP.No.76 of 2022 in Rev.AplW.SR.No.113947 of 2021 WMP.No.1190 of 2022 in Rev.AplW.SR.No.2660 of 2022 — K. Sathyabal Versus 1.  The Chairman & Members     Election Committee     M.H.A.A., Chennai – 600 104 https://sekarreporter.com/mhaa-election-case-full-order-the-honourable-mr-justice-r-mahadevan-and-the-honourable-mr-justice-mohammed-shaffiq-review-application-no-167-of-2021-and-wmp-no-27334-of-2021-and-wmp-no-27830-o/
[10/14, 16:10] Sekarreporter 1: K. Sathyabal, P-in-P
For petitioner in WMPs : Mr.N.Jyothi for Mr.G.Mohanakrishnan, P-in-P in WMP.No.27830 of 2021
Mr.G.Murugendran for WMP.No.28296/2021

Mr.P.V.S.Giridhar for WMP.No.29088 of 2021

Mr.V.Jai Bharath for WMP.No.29947 of 2021

Mr.R.Dinesh Kumar for WMP.No.76/2022

Mr.R.Krishna Kumar P-in-P for WMP.No.1190 of 2022

For Respondents : Dr. A.E. Chelliah, senior counsel for R1 Mr.C.K.Chendrasekkar for R2
[10/14, 16:18] Sekarreporter 1: [10/14, 16:17] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1580872728718245889?t=kakyk3_aEZj5TJ03JRLjfw&s=08
[10/14, 16:17] Sekarreporter 1: PRESS RELEASE The Bar Council of Tamilnadu and Puducherry is implementing the Personal Accident Insurance Scheme to the advocates for the past 20 years and most of the advocates benefited from this scheme. The policy is going to be renewed by the National Insurance Company for the next one year and the benefits of the Group Insurance Policy are as follows:- https://sekarreporter.com/press-release-the-bar-council-of-tamilnadu-and-puducherry-is-implementing-the-personal-accident-insurance-scheme-to-the-advocates-for-the-past-20-years-and-most-of-the-advocates-benefited-from-this-s/
[10/14, 16:26] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/eCx5YbvlZUA
[10/14, 19:40] Sekarreporter 1: [10/14, 19:39] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1580923617113968641?t=fVz-wjoATqWkG-mQopFRcw&s=08
[10/14, 19:39] Sekarreporter 1: மருத்துவ படிப்பில் அரசு பள்ளி மாணவர்களுக்கான 7.5% இட ஒதுக்கீடு..
அரசு உதவி பெறும் பள்ளிகளுக்கும் நீட்டிப்பது குறித்து மறுஆய்வு செய்யலாம்..
என தமிழக அரசுக்கு
#MadrashighCourt
யோசனை…
#7.5Reservation
#Medicaladmission
#NEET
#JusticeSureshkumar gp muthukumar
[10/15, 06:20] Sekarreporter 1: Madras high court orders october 14th mam case , mhaa case 7.5% case https://sekarreporter.com/madras-high-court-orders-october-14th-mam-case-mhaa-case-7-5-case/
[10/15, 06:32] Sekarreporter 1: ,7.5% full order. THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR Writ Petition No.27295 of 2022 S.Varsha -Vs- 1.The Secretary    Health and Family Welfare Department    Secretariat. For Petitioner            :   Mr.A.V.Raja                                   For Respondents       :   Mr.P.Muthu Kumar, Government Pleader     Assisted by Mr.Stalin Abhimanyu-for R1 & R2     Ms.M.Sneha,     Standing Counsel – for R3 O R D E R . https://sekarreporter.com/7-5-full-order-the-honourable-mr-justice-r-suresh-kumar-writ-petition-no-27295-of-2022-s-varsha-vs-1-the-secretary-health-and-family-welfare-department-secretar/
[10/15, 06:57] Sekarreporter 1: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM   W.P.No.34112 of 2016 and. Petitioner               : Mr.T.Sudhan Raj                     For R1, R4 to R6                    : Mr.Stalin Abhimanyu                                                               Additional Government Pleader                     For R2                         : Mr.D.Gopal                                                               Government Advocate                     For R3                         : Mr.V.Murali O R D E R 1st respondent is directed to furnish the reasons and details regarding the spreading over of viral diseases, one after another, without any gap in the State of Tamil Nadu and by conducting necessary enquiry and to ascertain the activities of these pharmaceutical companies and other medicine traders https://sekarreporter.com/the-honourable-mr-justice-s-m-subramaniam-w-p-no-34112-of-2016-and-petitioner-mr-t-sudhan-raj/p
[10/15, 07:02] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/ZwQkw2qMDjA
[10/15, 07:03] Sekarreporter 1: [10/15, 07:02] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/ZwQkw2qMDjA
[10/15, 07:02] Sekarreporter 1: Ecxcellant speech எனது தந்தை பஸ்சில் பயணம்
[10/15, 07:04] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/gLed85JOFfc
[10/15, 07:05] Sekarreporter 1: [10/15, 07:04] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/gLed85JOFfc
[10/15, 07:04] Sekarreporter 1: நான் கடந்த வந்த பாதை
[10/15, 07:06] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/gGqizTZHi4U
[10/15, 07:07] Sekarreporter 1: [10/15, 07:06] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/gGqizTZHi4U
[10/15, 07:07] Sekarreporter 1: வக்கீ்ல் வெற்றி பெறுவது எப்படி படிங்க
[10/15, 07:11] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/zAcUlgf_1Y4
[10/15, 07:15] Sekarreporter 1: [10/15, 07:08] Sekarreporter 1: RCP ரஷ்யா நான் உக்ரைன் mhaa president speech
[10/15, 07:08] Sekarreporter 1: .
[10/15, 07:15] Sekarreporter 1: [10/15, 07:06] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/gGqizTZHi4U
[10/15, 07:07] Sekarreporter 1: வக்கீ்ல் வெற்றி பெறுவது எப்படி படிங்க
[10/15, 08:22] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/_PQr3e_GQwY
[10/15, 08:43] Sekarreporter 1: [10/15, 08:41] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/6y1RVRY1ZvQ
[10/15, 08:42] Sekarreporter 1: மின் கட்டண உயர்வு வழக்கு சுப்ரீம் கோர்ட்டில் மூத்த வக்கீல. வில்சன் வாதம் ஏற்பு
[10/15, 08:42] Sekarreporter 1: Sc case dismissed
[10/15, 12:00] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtube.com/shorts/PbJ9Lg09TD8?feature=share
[10/15, 12:01] Sekarreporter 1: [10/15, 12:00] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtube.com/shorts/PbJ9Lg09TD8?feature=share
[10/15, 12:01] Sekarreporter 1: 50 years at bar Ramasamy sir senior adv
[10/15, 14:22] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/GFHQ1_4CrnA
[10/15, 14:25] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/hc85_jupo3M
[10/15, 14:27] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/A10pMxjAJNU
[10/15, 14:27] Sekarreporter 1: s ramasamy senior adv (2) judge govinda raj and m ravinthiren
[10/15, 14:30] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/ZY0NxKijW1U
[10/15, 15:36] Sekarreporter 1: W.P.No.27323 of 2022 and W.M.P.No.26509 of 2022 R. SURESH KUMAR, J. Heard Mr.V.Lakshminarayanan, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.Edwin Prabhakar, learned Special Government Pleader for the 1st respondent and Mr.B.Vijay, learned Additional Government Pleader for the 2nd respondent https://sekarreporter.com/w-p-no-27323-of-2022-and-w-m-p-no-26509-of-2022-r-suresh-kumar-j-heard-mr-v-lakshminarayanan-learned-counsel-for-the-petitioner-mr-edwin-prabhakar-learned-special-government-pleader-for-the-1st/
[10/15, 15:38] Sekarreporter 1: W.P.No.27323 of 2022 and W.M.P.No.26509 of 2022 R. SURESH KUMAR, J. Heard Mr.V.Lakshminarayanan, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.Edwin Prabhakar, learned Special Government Pleader for the 1st respondent and Mr.B.Vijay, learned Additional Government Pleader for the 2nd respondent. Port coal tender case order https://sekarreporter.com/w-p-no-27323-of-2022-and-w-m-p-no-26509-of-2022-r-suresh-kumar-j-heard-mr-v-lakshminarayanan-learned-counsel-for-the-petitioner-mr-edwin-prabhakar-learned-special-government-pleader-for-the-1st/
[10/15, 18:35] Sekarreporter 1: https://youtu.be/BUHqe0ubDSQ
[10/16, 07:03] Sekarreporter 1: W.P.No.26989  of 2022 and WMP.No.26205 of 2022 R.SURESH KUMAR, J. The petitioner viz., Trichy Tollway Private Limited is a concessionaire under the National Highways Act as the construction work of the road in a particular stretch between Chennai and Trichy since has been entrusted to them, after completing the road work, the petitioner has been given the right of collecting the toll at two places viz., “Sengurichi” in Kallakurichi District and “Thirumandurai” in Perambalur District. https://sekarreporter.com/w-p-no-26989-of-2022-and-wmp-no-26205-of-2022-r-suresh-kumar-j-the-petitioner-viz-trichy-tollway-private-limited-is-a-concessionaire-under-the-national-highways-act-as-the-construction-work/

You may also like...