Follow:
- Next story [14/09, 16:30] Vinothpandian: 1979 (2) SCC 286 : union of india vs J Ahmed : Deficiency in personal character or personal ability do not constitute misconduct for taking disciplinary proceedings[14/09, 16:30] Vinothpandian: 2002 (7) SCC 117 ; nallabothu venkaiah vs state of Andhra pradesh : The principle that no innocent man ahould be punished is equally applicable that no guilt man should be allowed to go unpunished , wrong acquittal of accused will send a wrong signal to the society[14/09, 16:30] Vinothpandian: 2007 (10) SCC 561 : divisional controller GSRTC vs kadarbhai J suthar : mere acquittal in criminal case does not have the effect of nullifying the decision taken in departmental proceedings as they operate in different areas of considerations[14/09, 16:30] Vinothpandian: 2006 (7) SCC 410 : General manager appellate authority bank of india vs mohd nizamuddin : gravity of misconduct has to be measured in terms of the nature of misconduct[14/09, 16:30] Vinothpandian: 2013 (4) CCC 20 : G subramani vs IV Rajasekaran : order 7 rule 11 CPC 1908 : A plaint cannot be rejected based on defence statement of defendant made in written statement or any averment made in affidavit filed in support of application filed under order 7 rule 11 of CPC
- Previous story Madras HC Quashes Reopening Assessment order u/s 148 based on grossly erroneous factual foundation is untenable-in-law
Recent Posts
- The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court directed Virudhunagar district administration to file a report on the action taken against Thiruchuli tahsildar, who permitted removal of seemai karuvelam trees in Kiruthumal river in Uluthimadai village panchayat, without auction.
- Supreme Court rejects review petition against judgment allowing sub-classification of SC/STsA seven-judge Constitution bench led by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud was of the view that no case for review was made out by the petitioners.CJI DY Chandrachud led 7-judge bench to hear SC ST sub-category caseCJI DY Chandrachud led 7-judge bench to hear SC ST sub-category case
- Writ Petition No.28589 of 2024N.ANAND VENKATESH, JThis writ petition has been filed challenging the proceedings ofthe third respondent dated 05.09.2024 and for a consequential direction to the respondents to allocate duty to the petitioner only to the hearing impaired students studying in the fifth respondent school and to consider the request made by the petitioner to grant/sanction leave to the petitioner on Government holidays.for petner kavitha adv argued
- [06/10, 15:28] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1842866950583591292?t=B3osCuxBnWBM7AcWaXCcfQ&s=08[06/10, 15:28] sekarreporter1: Justice Kannadasan at the Air Show Celebration along with his daughter Keerthana Arulnithi and grandchildren Mazhilan Arulnithi and Saaral Arulnithi.[06/10, 15:29] sekarreporter1: 👍👍🌹🌹
- தலைமை நீதிபதி கே.ஆர்.ஸ்ரீராம் மற்றும் நீதிபதி டி.கிருஷ்ணகுமார் அமர்வு, கடந்த 2017ம் ஆண்டே கூடுதல் ஊதியத் தொகையை திரும்பச் செலுத்திய மனுதாரர், மூன்று ஆண்டுகளுக்கு பின் உயர்நீதிமன்றத்தில் வழக்கு தாக்கல் செய்துள்ளதாகக் கூறி, தனி நீதிபதி உத்தரவை ரத்து செய்து உத்தரவிட்டது.
More
Recent Posts
- The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court directed Virudhunagar district administration to file a report on the action taken against Thiruchuli tahsildar, who permitted removal of seemai karuvelam trees in Kiruthumal river in Uluthimadai village panchayat, without auction.
- Supreme Court rejects review petition against judgment allowing sub-classification of SC/STsA seven-judge Constitution bench led by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud was of the view that no case for review was made out by the petitioners.CJI DY Chandrachud led 7-judge bench to hear SC ST sub-category caseCJI DY Chandrachud led 7-judge bench to hear SC ST sub-category case
- Writ Petition No.28589 of 2024N.ANAND VENKATESH, JThis writ petition has been filed challenging the proceedings ofthe third respondent dated 05.09.2024 and for a consequential direction to the respondents to allocate duty to the petitioner only to the hearing impaired students studying in the fifth respondent school and to consider the request made by the petitioner to grant/sanction leave to the petitioner on Government holidays.for petner kavitha adv argued
- [06/10, 15:28] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1842866950583591292?t=B3osCuxBnWBM7AcWaXCcfQ&s=08[06/10, 15:28] sekarreporter1: Justice Kannadasan at the Air Show Celebration along with his daughter Keerthana Arulnithi and grandchildren Mazhilan Arulnithi and Saaral Arulnithi.[06/10, 15:29] sekarreporter1: 👍👍🌹🌹
- தலைமை நீதிபதி கே.ஆர்.ஸ்ரீராம் மற்றும் நீதிபதி டி.கிருஷ்ணகுமார் அமர்வு, கடந்த 2017ம் ஆண்டே கூடுதல் ஊதியத் தொகையை திரும்பச் செலுத்திய மனுதாரர், மூன்று ஆண்டுகளுக்கு பின் உயர்நீதிமன்றத்தில் வழக்கு தாக்கல் செய்துள்ளதாகக் கூறி, தனி நீதிபதி உத்தரவை ரத்து செய்து உத்தரவிட்டது.