Mhc chief justice transfer mhc eminent advocates full debate. Sekarreporter1: [11/13, 14:34] Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1459447007282487298?t=MbYYGJqPXHQ8M4trs8Trng&s=08 [11/13, 14:34] Sekarreporter1: Senior advocates Hon’b(e Mr. Justice NV Ramana, The Chief Justice of India Supreme Court of India, New Delhi. Hon’ble Mr. Justice U.U. La(it, Supreme Court of India, New Delhi. 3, Hon’b(e Mr. Justice A.M. khanwi(kar, Supreme Court of India, New
[11/13, 14:35] Sekarreporter1: [11/13, 14:34] Sekarreporter1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1459447007282487298?t=MbYYGJqPXHQ8M4trs8Trng&s=08
[11/13, 14:34] Sekarreporter1: Senior advocates Hon’b(e Mr. Justice NV Ramana, The Chief Justice of India Supreme Court of India, New Delhi. Hon’ble Mr. Justice U.U. La(it, Supreme Court of India, New Delhi. 3, Hon’b(e Mr. Justice A.M. khanwi(kar, Supreme Court of India, New Delhi. Hon’ble Dr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud Supreme Court of India, New Delhi Hon’b(e Mr. Justice L. Nageswara Rao Supreme Court of lndia, New Delhi Respected Judges, We, the undersigned Senior Advocates of the Madras High Court, write this letter to express our concern and anguish over the transfer of Mr. Justice Sanjib Banerjee, Chief Justice of Madras High Court to Megha(aya High Court. https://sekarreporter.com/senior-advocates-honbe-mr-justice-nv-ramana-the-chief-justice-of-india-supreme-court-of-india-new-delhi-honble-mr-justice-u-u-lait-supreme-court-of-india-new-delhi-3-honbe-mr-jus/
[11/13, 14:40] Sekarreporter1: [11/13, 14:38] Kumarasamy Mhc Advt: What these Advocates are did in the transfer of Justice T.S.Sivagnanam. He is also upright Judge. No one has make Ju and cry about nativity Judge.
[11/13, 14:39]
[11/13, 15:17] Sekarreporter1: [11/13, 15:16] V subramani Advt: Based on certain verified informations…intelligence inputs…collegiam is taking decision….it is entirely in its prerogative to take decisions for administrative reasons…..Interference in such decisions by way of request by bar..is so immature …This is very dangerous trend….it may lead to presumption of favoritism by bar towards their choices…..it wil lead to disastrous consequences pan India with similar requests denting credibility of judiciary in public….Hope ..better sense would prevail over those signatories of senior members
[11/13, 15:16]
[11/13, 15:18] Sekarreporter1: [11/13, 14:55] Adv Suryaprakasam APS: Yes I fully agree. He also boldly upheld the rights of the poor farmers. Burnt mid night oil to protect the environment of the Tamilnadu.I am a nationalist to the core but it doesn’t mean that we have to go in deep slumber when judges belonging to our state are meted with injustice. We are all aware that we are treated as second class advocates not able to say anything more than 2 minutes and penalised for opening our mouth. How many advocates belonging to backward classes and rural background were heaped with insults we are aware. Since some of my friends are trying to project a different picture and maligning the decision of the collegium I am forced to post the voice of the oppressed advocates
[11/13, 14:57] Adv Suryaprakasam APS: If anyone want proof of bad behavior I am prepared to give the proof
[11/13, 15:20] Sekarreporter1: [11/13, 15:16] Sekarreporter1: [11/13, 15:16] V subramani Advt: Based on certain verified informations…intelligence inputs…collegiam is taking decision….it is entirely in its prerogative to take decisions for administrative reasons…..Interference in such decisions by way of request by bar..is so immature …This is very dangerous trend….it may lead to presumption of favoritism by bar towards their choices…..it wil lead to disastrous consequences pan India with similar requests denting credibility of judiciary in public….Hope ..better sense would prevail over those signatories of senior members
[11/13, 15:16]
[11/13, 15:20] V subramani Advt: When concerned judges are so dignified to accept the transfer and serve wherever they are posted …then ..why this kind of sycophantic hue and cry by some in Bar
[11/13, 16:19] Sekarreporter1: [11/13, 15:53] Mohamad Rafic Eb: Threat to the independence of Indian Judiciary is within as rightly said by Former SC Judge, Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh ( during his tenure in 1995/1996 in his special address speech in MHAA ) .
This is often ignored by the Collegium…
As long as the genuine, sensible ,valid objections of the legal luminaries from the Bar are ignored like this by the Collegium as any such interference in dministrative matters ( would result in many Judges with unimpeachable character, Remarkable Judicial qualities , honesty , integrity, reliability , credibility and marvellous performance will have to act only like judicial office attendants in the near future. ..
Unjustifiable Transfers under the pretext of Administrative reasons are nothing but legal fallacy.
It is Judicial apprehension of the Bench and Bar to the Independence of Judiciary as, a whole…
The threat is within….
H S Mohamed Rafi adv
[11/13, 15:54] Mohamad Rafic Eb: Reply to V Subramanyam Adv
[11/13, 16:20] Sekarreporter1: [11/13, 15:42] Kumarasamy Mhc Advt: Before 2000 entire Highcourt and Supreme Court were eager to look into judgement of our Madras Highcourt Judgements after 2000 no Highcourt listen our Court Judgement. This is order of the day. Even if we cited SC judgement,our present Sitting Judges saying that Supreme Court passed the order invoking Article 142 of our Constitution. In these situations how we will practice!
[11/13, 16:08] Kumarasamy Mhc Advt: Before 2000 entire Highcourt and Supreme Court were eager to look into judgement of our Madras Highcourt Judgements after 2000 no Highcourt listen our Court Judgement. This is order of the day. Even if we cited SC judgement,our present Sitting Judges saying that Supreme Court passed the order invoking Article 142 of our Constitution. In these situations how we will practice!
[11/13, 16:45] Sekarreporter1: [11/13, 16:43] V subramani Advt: Unjustifiable transfers…judicial independence…functioning of collegium ..are the topics requiring a detailed debate….By way of general statement like this in the context of collegiam decisions.. may not be in good taste…Hard reality is ..good judge or bad judge is judged upon the results cases.. Differing perceptions abt personality of judges by members of bar in context of transfers may not warranted once a decision is taken by collegiam in the interest of justice
[11/13, 16:43] V subramani Advt: Reply to Mohammed Raffic
[11/13, 19:11] Sekarreporter1: [11/13, 19:10] Mohamad Rafic Eb: Yes.. True. Requires detailed debate and concrete action from. All sides of the Bench and Bar to revitallise the Judicial System in ndia that being the imminent necessity and order of the day.
With respect to VS adv, it is not general statement.
Reality of truth what the Bench and Bar are witnessing in the recent past about some of the collegium decision on transfer policies…
Decision of Collegium if it is unknown to the concience of Independent judicial system always will be subject to fair comments and reasonable request to the collegium from. the Bar will petsist in the interest of the independence of Indian Judiciary..
In such case if the Justice system requires the collegium could very well publish the adverse intelligence report assuming if it is any.
Bald or substantiated allegations thrown against the sitting judges of SC or HC is not strange in the recent three decades
[11/13, 19:11] Sekarreporter1: 👍🏾
[11/13, 20:37] Sekarreporter1: [11/13, 20:31] V subramani Advt: Sekar….Fm the Raffic statement….what i could notice is that he is having grievances with functioning of collegiam system…what is surprising is that these kind of voices would be raised at the certain occasions only….If there is a system approved by sc..let us respect it..If selection and transfers r subjected to criticism..termed as fair one..then functioning of system would be affected to great extent…..Even verdict of courts r subject to fair criticism..but at the of end it..we have to accept it as it is constitutional mandate…What is happening in reality…authors of vertict r being personally attacked..in the name of fair criticism….This is what happening here….In the interest of credibility of institution and sometimes..national security..we can’t expect .collegiam to share the materials…collegiam is not a public forum where everyone including bar can discuss the decisions and take a stand….Until the system is in place ….let us respect its prerogatives…If everyone at their whims start criticizing the decision..No doubt ..there would be chaos ..would lead to shake the very credibility of judiciary …
[11/13, 20:37] Sekarreporter1: 👍🏾
[11/13, 20:54] Sekarreporter1: [11/13, 20:48] Mohamad Rafic Eb: Mr VS is diverting the issue with unconnected topics criticism of Judicial decision by a section of the people who might have been aggrieved by such judicial decision.
The point of discussion now in the present context is the Administrative functions of the Collegium system in decision making process and the methodology adopted.
No doubt we the Members of the Bar and the learned Judges do respect the Collegium and we appreciate the legal and Judicial discipline.
The issue is not about any individual grievances about the Collegium system.
It is a matter of public importance where the transparancy is warranted in the interest of the public at large.
Where is the question of security aspects involved in transferring aChief Justice who lead Charteref High Court of about 70 HC Judges and when he had delivered land mark judgements of public importance…
Pls do not try to divert the topic that we discuss…
Better let us not give any further room to embarasd the concerned Chief Judge on Transfer by employing unpleasant words
[11/13, 20:53] Sekarreporter1: ..
