You may also like...
-
This Writ Petition has been filed by way of Public Interest litigation and it is open to the authority concerned to dig the subject land and ascertain as to whether there was any Theppakulam or not, as claimed by the petitioner. If the subject land is found to be a water body, it should be restored to its original position. It is made clear that pendency of this writ petition is not a bar for the enquiry to go on. The District Collector, Madurai District and the Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Board, shall file a status report before this Court on the next hearing date. We also make it clear that the Judgment and decree passed by the Civil Court will not bind the parties, who are not the parties to the civil suit. The respondents shall file a counter affidavit by 25.07.2023. Post 25.07.2023. sd/ 04/07/2023 / TRUE COPY / 19/07/2023 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai – 625 023. KRK TO THE COMMISSIONER HINDU RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE ENDOWMENTS BOARD, NO. 119, UTHAMAR GANDHI SALAI, NUNGAMBAKKAM, CHENNAI 014. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR MADURAI DISTRICT, MADURAI. THE SUPERINTENDING ARCHAEOLOGIST, ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF INDIA, CHENNAI CIRCLE, FORT ST. GEORGE, CHENNAI THE COMMISSIONER DEPARTMENT OF ARCHAEOLOGY, TAMIL VALARCHI VALAAGAM, TAMIZH SALAI, EGMORE, CHENNAI. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER HINDU RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE ENDOWMENTS BOARD, TNHB COLONY, ELLIS NAGAR, MADURAI, MADURAI DISTRICT. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE MADURAI CITY, MADURAI. THE THASILDHAR MADURAI WEST TALUK, MADURAI. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER / EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ARULMIGU MEENAKSHI SUNDARESHWARAR TEMPLE, MADURAI, MADURAI DISTRICT. +1. C.C. to N.VIGNESH Advocate SR.No.10207 ORDER IN WP(MD) No.16110 of 2023 Date :04/07/2023 SA/BUC/SAR. /19.07.2023/9P/10C Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023
by Sekar Reporter · Published July 25, 2023
-
sugar mill case judge anitha sumanth order. Prior to 2018, it was incumbent upon the State to have, in line with the observations at paragraph 55 of the judgment in U.P.Cane Federations, called for a Tripartite meet. Tamil Nadu being a welfare State cannot shy away from the responsibility of involving the cane growers and facilitating a platform where they can vent their grievances before the sugar mills, in anticipation that they would be viewed and perhaps and hopefully, addressed sympathetically. After all, needless to say, it is only the State that could have ensured a common meeting ground between the sugar mills and the farmers to ensure a fair bargain to both the parties. 56. Thus there is a direction to R1 and R2 to conjointly fix a date, call forthe attendance of the representatives of Sugar Mills as well as the cane growers and facilitate negotiations in the proper spirit, in anticipation of finding an amicable resolution in the matter. This exercise must be initiated forthwith and completed within twelve (12) weeks from today. Let a report of compliance be filed with the Registry in this regard by the official respondents. 57. With this direction, this Writ Petition stands disposed. No costs. Connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. 01.06.2023 Index: Yes/No Speaking order/Non Speaking Order Neutral Citation:Yes/No sl To 1.The Agricultural Production Commissioner And Principal Secretary to Government, State of Tamil Nadu, Agriculture Department, Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai – 600 009. 2.The Director of Sugar, 690, Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai – 600 035. 3. The Secretary to Government, The Union of India, Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution, Department of Food and Public Distribution, Krishi Bhavan, New Delhi – 110 114. DR. ANITA SUMANTH, J. sl W.P. No.28620 of 2014 and MP.Nos.1 & 2 of 2014 01.06.2023
by Sekar Reporter · Published July 14, 2023
-
Womens day women journalist in mhc
by Sekar Reporter · Published March 9, 2021