MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM C.M.A.Nos.4465, 4467 to 4469 of 2019 And C.M.P.Nos.25291, 25293, 25294 and 25295 of 2019 1.Mr.V.G.Santhosam 2.Mr.V.G.P.Ravidas 3.Mr.V.G.P.Rajadas arbitration order
by
Sekar Reporter
·
February 24, 2020
[2/24, 15:44] Sekarreporter: C.M.A.Nos.4465, 4467 to 4469 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 24-02-2020 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM C.M.A.Nos.4465, 4467 to 4469 of 2019 And C.M.P.Nos.25291, 25293, 25294 and 25295 of 2019 1.Mr.V.G.Santhosam 2.Mr.V.G.P.Ravidas 3.Mr.V.G.P.Rajadas 4.Mr.V.G.P.Babudas .. Appellants in all CMAs vs. 1.Mrs.Shanthi Gnanasekaran 2.Mr.V.G.P.Prasaddas 3.Mr.V.G.P.Murphydas 4.Mr.V.G.S.Vinodh Raj 5.Mr.V.G.Selvaraj 6.Mr.V.G.S.Rajesh Alias Amaladas Rajesh .. Respondents in all CMAs These Civil Miscellaneous Appeals are preferred under Section 37(2)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to set aside the impugned orders dated 02.11.2019 passed by the learned Arbitrator in M.A.Nos.4 of 2019 in Arbitration Claim No.1 of 2019, 4 of 2019 in Arbitration Claim No.3 of 2019, 4 of 2019 in Arbitration Claim No.2 of 2019 and 4 of 2019 in Arbitration Claim No.4 of 2019. For Appellants in all CMAs : Mr.S.R.Rajagopal for M/s.Ojas Law Firm. For Respondent-1 : Mr.AL.Somayaji, Senior Counsel for 1/87 [2/24, 15:50] Sekarreporter: C.M.A.Nos.4465, 4467 to 4469 of 2019 Mr.B.Nedunchezhiyan. For Respondents-4&5 : Mr.H.Karthik Seshadri For Respondent-6 : Mr.R.Saravanakumar C OM M M O N J U D G M E N T The lis on hand arose in result of the orders passed by the sole Arbitrator on 02.11.2019 in M.A.No.4 of 2019. The sole Arbitrator passed orders, impleading the first respondent Mrs.Shanthi Gnanasekaran to participate in the adjudicative process in Arbitration Claim Nos.1, 3, 2 and 4 of 2019. Challenging the said impleadments, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeals are filed both on factual and on legal grounds. THE COMMON FACTS IN BRIEF: The appellants state that the partnership firm M/s.V.G.P. Beach Housing was originally formed on 27.03.1979 by and between late Mr.V.G.Panneerdas, Mr.V.G.Santhosam, Mr.V.G.Selvaraj, Mr.V.G.P.Ravidas and Mr.V.G.P.Rajadas. On 16.12.1982, the partnership firm was reconstituted with the induction of two new partners, namely, Mr.V.G.P.Babudas and Mr.V.G.S.Rajesh and thereby every partner was entitled to 1/7th of the net profits in accordance with 2/87 [2/24, 15:51] Sekarreporter: C.M.A.Nos.4465, 4467 to 4469 of 2019 has established a semblance of right, which is sufficient for impleading the first respondent in the arbitral adjudication. This Court is of the considered opinion that this itself amounts to expanding the scope of the arbitration proceedings. A semblance of right referred by the Arbitrator is relatable to the civil right of the first respondent regarding her right of inheritance from her father late Mr.V.G.Panneerdas. “The Doctrine of No-Prejudice” cannot have any application with reference to the impleadment of a person in a dispute under the Arbitration Agreement within the ambit and provisions of the Arbitration Act, 1996. The impact of the application of the said Doctrine, would result in exercise of inherent powers of the Court of Law. Thus, the rights of a third person to an Arbitration Agreement cannot be adjudicated during the further or final hearing of the arbitral proceedings. In view of the facts, circumstances and the discussions elaborately made in the aforementioned paragraphs, this Court has no hesitation in arriving a conclusion that the Arbitrator has exercised excess jurisdiction beyond the scope of the provisions of the Arbitration Act as well as beyond the scope of the contracted arbitral 85/87 [2/24, 15:51] Sekarreporter: C.M.A.Nos.4465, 4467 to 4469 of 2019 proceedings and consequently, the orders dated 02.11.2019 passed by the Arbitrator M.A.Nos.4 of 2019 in Arbitration Claim No.1 of 2019, 4 of 2019 in Arbitration Claim No.3 of 2019, 4 of 2019 in Arbitration Claim No.2 of 2019 and 4 of 2019 in Arbitration Claim No.4 of 2019 are quashed. Consequently, C.M.A.Nos.4465, 4467 to 4469 of 2019 stands allowed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. The connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 24-02-2020 Index : Yes/No. Internet: Yes/No. Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order Svn S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. 86/87