Follow:
- Next story [23/07, 10:40] Vinothpandian: 2018(3) SCC ( cri ) 232 : state of Rajasthan vs mohan lal : gravity of crime ,motive ,nature of crime and other attending circumstances to be borne in mind ,imposition of inadequate sentence does more harm to judicial system ,court must see that victim does not lose confidence in judicial system and resort to private vengeance[23/07, 10:40] Vinothpandian: 2004 (9) SCC 421 : chairman , Ludhiana improvement trust vs kanwaljit singh : word ” civil contempt ” means wilful disobedience to any judgement , decree , direction , order , writ or other process of a court or wilful breach of an undertaking given to a court[23/07, 10:40] Vinothpandian: 1972 (4) SCC 412 : NB mirzan vs The disciplinary committee of the bar council of maharastra : demand of money from client towards court expenses without actually spending the amount for the purpose , the advocate is guilty of professional misconduct[23/07, 10:40] Vinothpandian: AIR 2000 MAD 4 ; Akbar Ali vs Alla pitchai : It is the duty of court to issue notice to counsel who had filed caveat and without hearing the counsel , order should not be passed ( sec 148 A CPC 1908 )
- Previous story WP No.18163 of 2024THE HON’BLE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU, J.The petitioner seeks a direction against the official respondents to consider the representation dated 14.06.2024 and pass orders for changing the alignment plan in connection with the Metro Rail Project made by the fifth respondent and approved by the sixth respondent in respect of the Five Tier Temple Raja Gopuram of Sri Rathina Vinayakar Durgai Amman Temple, Whites Road, Royapettah, Chennai.
Recent Posts
- Writ Petition No.28589 of 2024N.ANAND VENKATESH, JThis writ petition has been filed challenging the proceedings ofthe third respondent dated 05.09.2024 and for a consequential direction to the respondents to allocate duty to the petitioner only to the hearing impaired students studying in the fifth respondent school and to consider the request made by the petitioner to grant/sanction leave to the petitioner on Government holidays.for petner kavitha adv argued
- [06/10, 15:28] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1842866950583591292?t=B3osCuxBnWBM7AcWaXCcfQ&s=08[06/10, 15:28] sekarreporter1: Justice Kannadasan at the Air Show Celebration along with his daughter Keerthana Arulnithi and grandchildren Mazhilan Arulnithi and Saaral Arulnithi.[06/10, 15:29] sekarreporter1: 👍👍🌹🌹
- தலைமை நீதிபதி கே.ஆர்.ஸ்ரீராம் மற்றும் நீதிபதி டி.கிருஷ்ணகுமார் அமர்வு, கடந்த 2017ம் ஆண்டே கூடுதல் ஊதியத் தொகையை திரும்பச் செலுத்திய மனுதாரர், மூன்று ஆண்டுகளுக்கு பின் உயர்நீதிமன்றத்தில் வழக்கு தாக்கல் செய்துள்ளதாகக் கூறி, தனி நீதிபதி உத்தரவை ரத்து செய்து உத்தரவிட்டது.
- THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANIW.P.No.30639 of 2017A.Radhakrishnan Petitioner Vs.1.The Commissioner of Land Administration,Chepuak,Chennai – 600 005.2.The Commissioner,Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowments Department, 119, Nungambakkam High
- The Madras High Court has held that mere possession of tainted money is sufficient to invoke the provisions of Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) and the burden to prove the innocence lies upon the persons facing money-laundering charges.
More
Recent Posts
- Writ Petition No.28589 of 2024N.ANAND VENKATESH, JThis writ petition has been filed challenging the proceedings ofthe third respondent dated 05.09.2024 and for a consequential direction to the respondents to allocate duty to the petitioner only to the hearing impaired students studying in the fifth respondent school and to consider the request made by the petitioner to grant/sanction leave to the petitioner on Government holidays.for petner kavitha adv argued
- [06/10, 15:28] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1842866950583591292?t=B3osCuxBnWBM7AcWaXCcfQ&s=08[06/10, 15:28] sekarreporter1: Justice Kannadasan at the Air Show Celebration along with his daughter Keerthana Arulnithi and grandchildren Mazhilan Arulnithi and Saaral Arulnithi.[06/10, 15:29] sekarreporter1: 👍👍🌹🌹
- தலைமை நீதிபதி கே.ஆர்.ஸ்ரீராம் மற்றும் நீதிபதி டி.கிருஷ்ணகுமார் அமர்வு, கடந்த 2017ம் ஆண்டே கூடுதல் ஊதியத் தொகையை திரும்பச் செலுத்திய மனுதாரர், மூன்று ஆண்டுகளுக்கு பின் உயர்நீதிமன்றத்தில் வழக்கு தாக்கல் செய்துள்ளதாகக் கூறி, தனி நீதிபதி உத்தரவை ரத்து செய்து உத்தரவிட்டது.
- THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANIW.P.No.30639 of 2017A.Radhakrishnan Petitioner Vs.1.The Commissioner of Land Administration,Chepuak,Chennai – 600 005.2.The Commissioner,Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowments Department, 119, Nungambakkam High
- The Madras High Court has held that mere possession of tainted money is sufficient to invoke the provisions of Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) and the burden to prove the innocence lies upon the persons facing money-laundering charges.