![[8/28, 11:49] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/VOT24x7/status/1299229336466124801?s=08 [8/28, 11:49] Sekarreporter 1: தமிழ்நாடு வக்பு வாரியத்தை கலைத்து அரசு பிறப்பித்த ஆணையை ரத்து செய்து சென்னை உயர்நீதிமன்றம் அளித்த தீர்ப்புக்கு இடைக்கால தடை விதித்தது உச்சநீதிமன்றம்! #MadrasHC | #TNGovt @VOT24x7 https://t.co/F63yMQVaIm](https://sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
Follow:
- Next story Advocate sold tea with gown news www.sekarreporter .com
- Previous story Plea against Rammandir dismissed tv news www.sekarreporter.com
Recent Posts
- Chief justice and Baratha Chakravarthy order/ In view thereof, it is no longer possible for any State Government or Union of India to appoint anybody else, more specifically Deputy Labour Commissioner etc., as Presiding Officer of the Industrial Tribunal. Thus, it can be seen that virtually the impugned clauses in Section 7 or 7-A cannot be operated anymore. Thus, both the provisions that are challenged at present remain dead letters in the statute book, only to be repealed by an appropriate repeal act.
- Tamil Nadu Recognized Aided Private vs The Principal Secretary To Government on 9 March, 2023
- Today law tips /DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: In Prabhakara Adiga vs Gowri And Ors (2017) 4 SCC 97, the Honourable Supreme Court in paragraph 25 held as under:-
- THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.CHANDRASEKHARANW. P.Nos.32765 & 32766 of 2014andW.M.P.No.11454 of 2017Muthulakshmi … Petitioner in both W.Ps’Vs1.The Secretary to the Government of Tamil Nadu, Home Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009.2.The Director General of Police, Chennai – 600 004.
- Today 4 law tips Vinothpandian: 2011 (5) SCC 708 : sushil suri vs CBI : In a cheating case initiated by the bank , a person cannot be exonerated from criminal liabilty merely because dues of bank have been paid up[02/05, 11:20] Vinothpandian: 2013 (1) All india criminal LR ( cal ) 451 : keshab naskar vs state : As far as section 326 IPC is concerned , corporal punishment of imprisonment is mandatory , a sentence of mere fine is not permissible
More
Recent Posts
- Chief justice and Baratha Chakravarthy order/ In view thereof, it is no longer possible for any State Government or Union of India to appoint anybody else, more specifically Deputy Labour Commissioner etc., as Presiding Officer of the Industrial Tribunal. Thus, it can be seen that virtually the impugned clauses in Section 7 or 7-A cannot be operated anymore. Thus, both the provisions that are challenged at present remain dead letters in the statute book, only to be repealed by an appropriate repeal act.
- Tamil Nadu Recognized Aided Private vs The Principal Secretary To Government on 9 March, 2023
- Today law tips /DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: In Prabhakara Adiga vs Gowri And Ors (2017) 4 SCC 97, the Honourable Supreme Court in paragraph 25 held as under:-
- THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.CHANDRASEKHARANW. P.Nos.32765 & 32766 of 2014andW.M.P.No.11454 of 2017Muthulakshmi … Petitioner in both W.Ps’Vs1.The Secretary to the Government of Tamil Nadu, Home Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 600 009.2.The Director General of Police, Chennai – 600 004.
- Today 4 law tips Vinothpandian: 2011 (5) SCC 708 : sushil suri vs CBI : In a cheating case initiated by the bank , a person cannot be exonerated from criminal liabilty merely because dues of bank have been paid up[02/05, 11:20] Vinothpandian: 2013 (1) All india criminal LR ( cal ) 451 : keshab naskar vs state : As far as section 326 IPC is concerned , corporal punishment of imprisonment is mandatory , a sentence of mere fine is not permissible