Follow:
- Next story Additional Public Prosecutor contended that the threat of COVID-19 was one of the prime grounds on which the special court had granted bail and that taking such issues into consideration would lead to lawlessness in the State, the judge asked whether the State had been showing similar interest in other criminal cases also
- Previous story துணைத்தலைவர் உஷாராணி, சென்னை உயர்நீதி மன்றத்தில் மனுத்தாக்கல். தமிழ்நாடு பஞ்சாயத்து சட்டப்படி, ஒன்றிய பெருந்தலைவர் இல்லாத நிலையில், தலைவரது பணிகளை செயல்படுத்த துணைத்தலைவருக்கு உரிமை உள்ளது என்று மனுவில் குறிப்பிடப்பட்டுள்ளது. தேர்ந்தெடுக்கப்பட்ட உள்ளாட்சி மன்றத்தையும் மற்றும் மக்கள் பிரதிநிதிகளையும் செயல்பட அனுமதிக்காதது சட்டவிரோதமானது என்றும் மனுவில் குறிப்பிடப்பட்டுள்ளது
Recent Posts
- today 5 legal tips Vinothpandian: 2019 (2) SCC ( cri ) 801 : Rajesh & others vs state of haryana : A person not named in FIR or a person though named in FIR but has not been charge sheeted or a person who has been discharged can be summoned under section 319 of CRPC provided from evidence , it appears that such person can be tried along with accused already facing trial
- DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: Hon’ble Mr.Justice S.M.Subramaniam’s view on “adjournments” and “speedy disposal of trial”:
- [29/04, 08:56] Devanathan Registrar Judicial: Dear sir,Good morning.
- [29/04, 07:51] DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: In the case of Meenakshisundaram Textiles vs Valliammal Textiles Ltd reported in 2011 (3) CTC 168 = 2011 (3) LW 80, the Division Bench of Madras High Court elaborately discussed by relying the Supreme Court judgments about that even an ex parte judgment should satisfy the description of ‘judgment’ as laid down in Order 20, Rule 4(2), C.P.C:
- There will be a farewell address by the Advocate-General to the Hon’ble Thiru. Justice G. CHANDRASEKHARAN, Judge, High Court, Madras, on Tuesday, the 30 th April, 2024, at 3.30 p.m., at Meeting Hall, Additional Library Building, High Court, Madras, on His Lordship attaining the age of superannuation on 30 th May 2024.The proceedings can b
More
Recent Posts
- today 5 legal tips Vinothpandian: 2019 (2) SCC ( cri ) 801 : Rajesh & others vs state of haryana : A person not named in FIR or a person though named in FIR but has not been charge sheeted or a person who has been discharged can be summoned under section 319 of CRPC provided from evidence , it appears that such person can be tried along with accused already facing trial
- DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: Hon’ble Mr.Justice S.M.Subramaniam’s view on “adjournments” and “speedy disposal of trial”:
- [29/04, 08:56] Devanathan Registrar Judicial: Dear sir,Good morning.
- [29/04, 07:51] DURAIVAIYAPURI Mhc Advt: In the case of Meenakshisundaram Textiles vs Valliammal Textiles Ltd reported in 2011 (3) CTC 168 = 2011 (3) LW 80, the Division Bench of Madras High Court elaborately discussed by relying the Supreme Court judgments about that even an ex parte judgment should satisfy the description of ‘judgment’ as laid down in Order 20, Rule 4(2), C.P.C:
- There will be a farewell address by the Advocate-General to the Hon’ble Thiru. Justice G. CHANDRASEKHARAN, Judge, High Court, Madras, on Tuesday, the 30 th April, 2024, at 3.30 p.m., at Meeting Hall, Additional Library Building, High Court, Madras, on His Lordship attaining the age of superannuation on 30 th May 2024.The proceedings can b