SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

SEKAR REPORTER Blog

By and large, in our considered opinion, the petitioner herein deserves no leniency from this Court, as the Tribunal has rightly analyzed the evidence on record and restored the findings of the Original Authority. Since there is a finding of fact and no question of law is involved, we are of the view that there is no perversity in the findings of the Tribunal, warranting interference by this Court. In the result, these Writ Petitions are dismissed. No costs.                                                                                 (S.V.N.J.,)       (C.S.N.J.,)                                                                                            21.12.2022        Index           :   Yes/No Internet        :   Yes/No Speaking     :    Non Speaking Order ar             To: Tamil Nadu Sales Tax Appellate           Tribunal (Additional Bench),     Coimbatore-641 018. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner           of Commercial Taxes,     Pollachi. The Commercial Tax Officer,     Tirupur (Central-II),     Tirupur.                 VAIDYANATHAN,J. AND SARAVANAN,J. ar Pre-delivery Order in W.P.Nos.4303 and 4304 of 2008 21.12.2022

Uncategorized

By and large, in our considered opinion, the petitioner herein deserves no leniency from this Court, as the Tribunal has rightly analyzed the evidence on record and restored the findings of the Original Authority. Since there is a finding of fact and no question of law is involved, we are of the view that there is no perversity in the findings of the Tribunal, warranting interference by this Court. In the result, these Writ Petitions are dismissed. No costs.                                                                                 (S.V.N.J.,)       (C.S.N.J.,)                                                                                            21.12.2022        Index           :   Yes/No Internet        :   Yes/No Speaking     :    Non Speaking Order ar             To: Tamil Nadu Sales Tax Appellate           Tribunal (Additional Bench),     Coimbatore-641 018. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner           of Commercial Taxes,     Pollachi. The Commercial Tax Officer,     Tirupur (Central-II),     Tirupur.                 VAIDYANATHAN,J. AND SARAVANAN,J. ar Pre-delivery Order in W.P.Nos.4303 and 4304 of 2008 21.12.2022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Reserved on Pronounced on 01.11.2022 21.12.2022 CORAM THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN W.P.Nos.4303 and 4304 of 2008 M/s.Tirupur Sree Annapoorna, Rep. by...

Coviction setaside THE COURT OF SESSIONS AT CHENNAI Present: Tmt.S.Alli, M.L., Principal Sessions Judge. Friday, the 18th day of November, 2022. Criminal Appeal No.16/2020 (CNR No.TNCH01­001403­2020) against E.O.C.C.No.243/2012 (On the file of learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, (E.O.I), Egmore, Chennai) From what Court the  appeal           :      Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, is preferred                                                               (E.O.I), Egmore, Chennai. Number of the case in that Court :       E.O.C.C.No.243 / 2012 Number of the Appeal

Uncategorized

Coviction setaside THE COURT OF SESSIONS AT CHENNAI Present: Tmt.S.Alli, M.L., Principal Sessions Judge. Friday, the 18th day of November, 2022. Criminal Appeal No.16/2020 (CNR No.TNCH01­001403­2020) against E.O.C.C.No.243/2012 (On the file of learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, (E.O.I), Egmore, Chennai) From what Court the  appeal           :      Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, is preferred                                                               (E.O.I), Egmore, Chennai. Number of the case in that Court :       E.O.C.C.No.243 / 2012 Number of the Appeal

IN THE COURT OF SESSIONS AT CHENNAI Present: Tmt.S.Alli, M.L., Principal Sessions Judge. Friday, the 18th day of November, 2022. Criminal Appeal No.16/2020 (CNR No.TNCH01­001403­2020) against E.O.C.C.No.243/2012 (On the file of learned Additional Chief...

Shabnam Banu  appeared for the appellants-accused and Special Public Prosecutor N P Kumar, appeared for the respondent-state. Procedural Incompliances in Trial: Sessions Court at Chennai sets aside Conviction under Customs Act Procedural – Trial – Sessions – Court – Customs – Act –

Uncategorized

Shabnam Banu  appeared for the appellants-accused and Special Public Prosecutor N P Kumar, appeared for the respondent-state. Procedural Incompliances in Trial: Sessions Court at Chennai sets aside Conviction under Customs Act Procedural – Trial – Sessions – Court – Customs – Act –

  [12/31, 10:45] sekarreporter1: Procedural Incompliances in Trial: Sessions Court at Chennai sets aside Conviction under Customs Act Procedural – Trial – Sessions – Court – Customs – Act – The appellants / accused...

தர்மபுரி மாவட்டத்தில் ஆதி திராவிடர்களுக்கு ஒதுக்கப்பட்ட மயானத்திற்கு சாலை வசதி அமைக்கக் கோரிய வழக்கில் ஆக்கிரமிப்புகளை அகற்றி, மயானத்திற்கு சாலை அமைக்க ஆதி திராவிட நலத்துறை சிறப்பு தாசில்தார்க்கு சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது.

Uncategorized

தர்மபுரி மாவட்டத்தில் ஆதி திராவிடர்களுக்கு ஒதுக்கப்பட்ட மயானத்திற்கு சாலை வசதி அமைக்கக் கோரிய வழக்கில் ஆக்கிரமிப்புகளை அகற்றி, மயானத்திற்கு சாலை அமைக்க ஆதி திராவிட நலத்துறை சிறப்பு தாசில்தார்க்கு சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது.

தர்மபுரி மாவட்டத்தில் ஆதி திராவிடர்களுக்கு ஒதுக்கப்பட்ட மயானத்திற்கு சாலை வசதி அமைக்கக் கோரிய வழக்கில் ஆக்கிரமிப்புகளை அகற்றி, மயானத்திற்கு சாலை அமைக்க ஆதி திராவிட நலத்துறை சிறப்பு தாசில்தார்க்கு சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது. தர்மபுரி மாவட்டத்தை சேர்ந்த கண்மணி என்பவர் தாக்கல் செய்துள்ள மனுவில், அவர்...

Sm subramaniyam judge order மைனர் குழந்தைகளை கவனிக்க வேண்டிய கடமையில் இருந்து வருவாய் ஈட்டும் தந்தை தப்பிப்பதை பொறுத்துக் கொள்ள முடியாது என சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் தெரிவித்துள்ளது.

Uncategorized

Sm subramaniyam judge order மைனர் குழந்தைகளை கவனிக்க வேண்டிய கடமையில் இருந்து வருவாய் ஈட்டும் தந்தை தப்பிப்பதை பொறுத்துக் கொள்ள முடியாது என சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் தெரிவித்துள்ளது.

மைனர் குழந்தைகளை கவனிக்க வேண்டிய கடமையில் இருந்து வருவாய் ஈட்டும் தந்தை தப்பிப்பதை பொறுத்துக் கொள்ள முடியாது என சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் தெரிவித்துள்ளது. கருத்து வேறுபாடு காரணமாக பிரிந்து சென்ற மனைவியிடம் இருந்து விவாகரத்து கோரி கணவர், சென்னை பூந்தமல்லி நீதிமன்றத்தில் வழக்கு தொடர்ந்துள்ளார். திருச்சியில்...

Since the 2nd accused/appellant is on bail, the trial Court shall take steps to secure the 2nd appellant/2nd Accused to commit him in prison to serve out the remaining period of sentence. The period of sentence already undergone by the appellants/accused, shall be set off under Section 428 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (P.N.P.,J.)      (TKRJ)                                                                                23.12.2022 Index:Yes/No ars To The Principal District and Sessions Judge,          The Inspector of Police,     Thanipadi Police Station,     Tiruvannamalai District. The Public Prosecutor,     Madras High Court, Chennai – 600 104. P.N.PRAKASH, J. and RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN, J. ars Pre-delivery Judgment made in Crl.A.No.194 of 2019 23.12.2022

Uncategorized

Since the 2nd accused/appellant is on bail, the trial Court shall take steps to secure the 2nd appellant/2nd Accused to commit him in prison to serve out the remaining period of sentence. The period of sentence already undergone by the appellants/accused, shall be set off under Section 428 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (P.N.P.,J.)      (TKRJ)                                                                                23.12.2022 Index:Yes/No ars To The Principal District and Sessions Judge,          The Inspector of Police,     Thanipadi Police Station,     Tiruvannamalai District. The Public Prosecutor,     Madras High Court, Chennai – 600 104. P.N.PRAKASH, J. and RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN, J. ars Pre-delivery Judgment made in Crl.A.No.194 of 2019 23.12.2022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS RESERVED ON : 30.11.2022 PRONOUNCED ON:  23.12.2022 CORAM THE HONOURABLE  MR. JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN Crl.A.No.194 of 2019 Balaji Soundararajan ..   ...

5.This Court is of the considered opinion that the Judicial Officers cannot be unnecessarily pressurized by the higher courts. No doubt, in some cases, the higher courts do direct the Trial Courts to expedite the cases, however, it cannot be a routine affair so as to cause unnecessary pressure in the minds of the Judicial Officers, who all are already working in difficult situations. If at all several such directions are issued by the higher courts for the speedy disposal of suits or cases, it may not be practically possible for the Trial Courts to dispose of all such cases. Thus, the pendency involved, and the capacity of the Courts to dispose of the cases are to be taken into consideration by the higher courts while issuing a direction to dispose of the cases in a speedy manner. Complex situations are also to be considered in a practical and pragmatic way, so as to ensure that the Judicial Officers perform their duties in a free and peaceful manner. 6.This being the principles to be followed, the Trial Court in the present case has to take effort to dispose of the cases as expeditiously as possible and it is to be borne in mind that all cases are to be treated equally and no litigant can claim unnecessary preference unless there is a justification for the speedy disposal. 7.Accordingly the Civil Revision Petition stands disposed of. However, there shall be no order as to costs. sha                             07.12.2022 Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No Speaking Order: Yes/No To Trial Court/learned Principal Sub Judge,     Chengalpattu S.M.SUBRAMANIAM.J., sha         C.R.P.(P.D) No.4058 of 2022 07.12.2022

Uncategorized

5.This Court is of the considered opinion that the Judicial Officers cannot be unnecessarily pressurized by the higher courts. No doubt, in some cases, the higher courts do direct the Trial Courts to expedite the cases, however, it cannot be a routine affair so as to cause unnecessary pressure in the minds of the Judicial Officers, who all are already working in difficult situations. If at all several such directions are issued by the higher courts for the speedy disposal of suits or cases, it may not be practically possible for the Trial Courts to dispose of all such cases. Thus, the pendency involved, and the capacity of the Courts to dispose of the cases are to be taken into consideration by the higher courts while issuing a direction to dispose of the cases in a speedy manner. Complex situations are also to be considered in a practical and pragmatic way, so as to ensure that the Judicial Officers perform their duties in a free and peaceful manner. 6.This being the principles to be followed, the Trial Court in the present case has to take effort to dispose of the cases as expeditiously as possible and it is to be borne in mind that all cases are to be treated equally and no litigant can claim unnecessary preference unless there is a justification for the speedy disposal. 7.Accordingly the Civil Revision Petition stands disposed of. However, there shall be no order as to costs. sha                             07.12.2022 Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No Speaking Order: Yes/No To Trial Court/learned Principal Sub Judge,     Chengalpattu S.M.SUBRAMANIAM.J., sha         C.R.P.(P.D) No.4058 of 2022 07.12.2022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 07.12.2022 CORAM THE HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM C.R.P.(P.D) No. 4058 of 2022 Gangadharan …Appellant/Plaintiff Vs. Sivakumar The Sub Registrar of Assurances 26, MES Road,...

(5) In the event of any failure on the part of the respondent in paying the Interim Maintenance to the minor girl child, the petitioner is at liberty to move the contempt petition before this Court.                               (6) The Interim Maintenance granted in the present Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is not a bar for the petitioner to claim further maintenance in accordance with law.                                 With the abovesaid directions, the Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition stands allowed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 22-12-2022 Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order. Internet : Yes/No. Index: Yes/No. Svn S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. Svn To 1.The Sub Judge,    Sub Court,    Poonamallee. 2.The Judge,    Family Court,    Tiruchirappalli. Tr.CMP No.764 of 2022 22-12-2022

Uncategorized

(5) In the event of any failure on the part of the respondent in paying the Interim Maintenance to the minor girl child, the petitioner is at liberty to move the contempt petition before this Court.                               (6) The Interim Maintenance granted in the present Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is not a bar for the petitioner to claim further maintenance in accordance with law.                                 With the abovesaid directions, the Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition stands allowed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 22-12-2022 Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order. Internet : Yes/No. Index: Yes/No. Svn S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. Svn To 1.The Sub Judge,    Sub Court,    Poonamallee. 2.The Judge,    Family Court,    Tiruchirappalli. Tr.CMP No.764 of 2022 22-12-2022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 22-12-2022 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM Tr.C.M.P.No.764 of 2022 and C.M.P.No.13069 of 2022     P.Geetha                                                                                                                                                 ...

sekarreporter1: Counsel for Petitioner Mrs. Roopeshwari Mahaveer Sai வழக்கை விரைந்து முடிக்க மனுதாரருக்கு உரிமை உண்டு வழக்கை நீடிக்க தேவையற்ற உள்நோக்கத்துடன் மனு தாக்கல் செய்தால் அனைத்து நீதிமன்றங்களும் அதிகபட்ச அபராதம் விதித்து மனுவை தள்ளுபடி செய்யப்பட வேண்டும் வேண்டுமென சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது.

Uncategorized

sekarreporter1: Counsel for Petitioner Mrs. Roopeshwari Mahaveer Sai வழக்கை விரைந்து முடிக்க மனுதாரருக்கு உரிமை உண்டு வழக்கை நீடிக்க தேவையற்ற உள்நோக்கத்துடன் மனு தாக்கல் செய்தால் அனைத்து நீதிமன்றங்களும் அதிகபட்ச அபராதம் விதித்து மனுவை தள்ளுபடி செய்யப்பட வேண்டும் வேண்டுமென சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்றம் உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது.

[12/30, 12:54] sekarreporter1: Counsel for Petitioner Mrs. Roopeshwari Mahaveer Sai வழக்கை விரைந்து முடிக்க மனுதாரருக்கு உரிமை உண்டு வழக்கை நீடிக்க தேவையற்ற உள்நோக்கத்துடன் மனு தாக்கல் செய்தால் அனைத்து நீதிமன்றங்களும் அதிகபட்ச அபராதம் விதித்து மனுவை தள்ளுபடி செய்யப்பட வேண்டும் வேண்டுமென சென்னை...